AMT vs CI
Comparison between American Tower Corp (AMT, Company) and Cigna Group (The) (CI, Company).
AMT is from the Real Estate sector, while CI is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceCI has outperformed AMT, delivering a return of +6.5% compared to -7.0%
AMT vs CI - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
AMT vs CI - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
AMT vs CI - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | AMT | CI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -3.73% | +4.96% |
| 2025 | +0.36% | +2.32% |
| 2024 | -13.33% | -9.48% |
| 2023 | +3.98% | -5.14% |
| 2022 | -24.04% | +43.83% |
| 2021 | +35.83% | +13.61% |
| 2020 | +0.10% | +1.60% |
| 2019 | +49.22% | +9.28% |
| 2018 | +14.56% | -6.22% |
| 2017 | +37.08% | +49.68% |
| 2016 | +11.50% | -8.95% |
| 2015 | -0.83% | +42.35% |
| 2014 | +26.35% | +19.45% |
| 2013 | +2.43% | +58.70% |
| 2012 | +33.09% | +23.78% |
| 2011 | +16.93% | +11.15% |
| 2010 | +18.82% | +0.92% |
| 2009 | +43.13% | +98.84% |
| 2008 | -28.90% | -68.86% |
| 2007 | +12.11% | +22.40% |
| 2006 | +36.56% | +17.26% |
| 2005 | +49.23% | +39.76% |
| 2004 | +67.73% | +43.22% |
| 2003 | +181.04% | +38.99% |
| 2002 | -64.66% | -54.53% |
| 2001 | -73.88% | -26.87% |
| 2000 | +29.24% | +71.09% |
| 1999 | +61.35% | +10.23% |
AMT vs CI Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for AMT was -98.70%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 2747 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CI was -84.34%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1265 trading sessions.
The current AMT drawdown is -36.43%. The current CI drawdown is -18.16%.
| Rank | AMT | CI |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.70% Mar 10, 2000 - Feb 10, 2011 | -84.34% Jan 9, 2008 - Jan 17, 2013 |
| #2 | -45.32% Sep 8, 2021 - Oct 4, 2023 | -72.61% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 10, 2006 |
| #3 | -30.29% Feb 13, 2020 - Apr 9, 2020 | -42.47% Jan 26, 2018 - Jan 20, 2021 |
| #4 | -26.02% Jul 29, 2020 - Jun 7, 2021 | -33.42% Mar 30, 2006 - Feb 1, 2007 |
| #5 | -19.19% Nov 2, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016 | -32.11% Sep 16, 2024 - Oct 31, 2025 |
| #6 | -18.95% May 21, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014 | -31.64% Jun 25, 2015 - Jun 19, 2017 |
| #7 | -18.30% Feb 11, 2011 - Oct 24, 2011 | -28.63% Nov 17, 1999 - May 18, 2000 |
| #8 | -16.81% Jan 21, 2000 - Feb 10, 2000 | -28.18% Dec 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2024 |
| #9 | -15.63% Nov 28, 2014 - Nov 2, 2015 | -27.48% May 10, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022 |
| #10 | -14.31% Sep 4, 2019 - Feb 10, 2020 | -19.91% May 29, 2007 - Jan 9, 2008 |
| #11 | -14.00% Jul 22, 2016 - Mar 21, 2017 | -16.06% Aug 11, 2000 - Oct 2, 2000 |
| #12 | -12.48% Nov 8, 2017 - Aug 3, 2018 | -16.03% Jan 21, 2014 - May 29, 2014 |
| #13 | -11.73% Apr 9, 2020 - Jun 1, 2020 | -13.17% Sep 16, 2013 - Nov 19, 2013 |
| #14 | -10.87% Feb 16, 2000 - Feb 29, 2000 | -11.98% Apr 1, 2024 - Sep 3, 2024 |
| #15 | -9.20% Dec 20, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000 | -11.01% Jan 20, 2021 - Mar 5, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between AMT and CI is 0.92 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
AMT vs CI dividend yield comparison.
| Year | AMT | CI |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.17% | 1.08% |
| 2025 | 3.87% | 2.19% |
| 2024 | 3.53% | 2.03% |
| 2023 | 2.99% | 1.64% |
| 2022 | 2.77% | 1.35% |
| 2021 | 1.78% | 1.74% |
| 2020 | 2.02% | 0.02% |
| 2019 | 1.64% | 0.02% |
| 2018 | 1.99% | 0.02% |
| 2017 | 1.84% | 0.02% |
| 2016 | 2.05% | 0.03% |
| 2015 | 1.87% | 0.03% |
| 2014 | 1.42% | 0.04% |
| 2013 | 1.38% | 0.05% |
| 2012 | 1.16% | 0.07% |
| 2011 | 0.58% | 0.10% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.11% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.11% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 0.24% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 0.08% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 0.09% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 0.50% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.30% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 3.21% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 1.38% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.37% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks