StockComparison Logo
vs

AMAT vs COST

Comparison between Applied Materials Inc (AMAT, Company) and Costco Wholesale Corp (COST, Company).

AMAT is from the Technology sector, while COST is from the Consumer Defensive sector.

5-Year PerformanceAMAT has outperformed COST, delivering a return of +33.5% compared to +18.2%

AMAT vs COST - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
AMAT
$440B
COST
$411B
Max Drawdown
AMAT
85.83%
Winner
COST
53.39%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
AMAT
2.11
COST
-0.17
5Y Beta
AMAT
1.93
Winner
COST
0.39
Industry
AMAT
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials
COST
Discount Stores
P/E Ratio
AMAT
50.54
Winner
COST
46.54
Forward P/E
Winner
AMAT
33.33
COST
41.32
PEG Ratio
Winner
AMAT
1.38
COST
3.67
Dividend Yield
AMAT
0.36%
Winner
COST
0.57%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
AMAT
29.13%
COST
-12.35%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
AMAT
27.08%
COST
13.27%
Debt to Equity
AMAT
27.00%
Winner
COST
16.92%
Free Cash Flow Yield
AMAT
1.21%
Winner
COST
2.14%

AMAT vs COST - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
AMAT
-3.94%
Winner
COST
-3.30%
3M
Winner
AMAT
+39.51%
COST
-8.57%
6M
Winner
AMAT
+75.01%
COST
-5.55%
1Y
Winner
AMAT
+203.19%
COST
-1.05%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
AMAT
+33.51%
COST
+18.21%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
AMAT
+37.29%
COST
+20.67%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
AMAT
+14.29%
COST
+14.28%

AMAT vs COST - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearAMATCOST
2026+109.84%+8.68%
2025+58.42%-4.72%
2024+6.17%+41.64%
2023+69.11%+50.03%
2022-38.55%-18.91%
2021+82.41%+50.47%
2020+40.61%+33.72%
2019+85.68%+44.95%
2018-37.28%+9.30%
2017+61.50%+22.66%
2016+77.56%+1.51%
2015-23.63%+19.11%
2014+44.75%+21.70%
2013+53.27%+18.56%
2012+10.29%+26.50%
2011-21.94%+16.31%
2010+0.47%+23.17%
2009+33.36%+12.51%
2008-40.93%-22.17%
2007-2.44%+33.29%
2006+1.68%+6.93%
2005+7.22%+4.29%
2004-22.62%+34.26%
2003+60.52%+28.16%
2002-37.46%-36.87%
2001+1.52%+7.74%
2000-39.62%-10.25%
1999+44.39%+16.15%

AMAT vs COST Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for AMAT was -85.22%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 4312 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for COST was -53.39%, occurring on Dec 24, 2002. Recovery took 1551 trading sessions.

The current AMAT drawdown is -22.16%. The current COST drawdown is -15.38%.

RankAMATCOST
#1-85.22%
Apr 7, 2000 - May 31, 2017
-53.39%
May 1, 2000 - Jul 3, 2006
#2-55.14%
Jan 14, 2022 - Dec 26, 2023
-48.03%
Jul 8, 2008 - Dec 20, 2010
#3-52.27%
Mar 9, 2018 - Nov 15, 2019
-31.40%
Apr 7, 2022 - Dec 5, 2023
#4-49.88%
Jul 10, 2024 - Nov 28, 2025
-22.02%
Sep 11, 2018 - Apr 1, 2019
#5-43.64%
Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 14, 2020
-20.74%
Feb 13, 2025 - May 18, 2026
#6-27.29%
Jun 30, 2026 - Jul 20, 2026
-20.65%
Feb 3, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000
#7-22.06%
Nov 21, 2017 - Feb 26, 2018
-19.49%
Dec 1, 2020 - May 27, 2021
#8-19.69%
Apr 5, 2021 - Sep 16, 2021
-18.54%
Jul 3, 2006 - Feb 15, 2007
#9-18.39%
Aug 14, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
-17.43%
Jun 7, 2017 - Nov 30, 2017
#10-18.19%
Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026
-16.57%
May 19, 2026 - Jul 9, 2026
#11-17.82%
Mar 27, 2000 - Apr 7, 2000
-16.23%
Dec 7, 2007 - May 1, 2008
#12-13.95%
Feb 24, 2021 - Mar 26, 2021
-15.93%
Dec 29, 2021 - Mar 29, 2022
#13-13.54%
Jun 8, 2017 - Jul 26, 2017
-15.86%
Dec 8, 2015 - Jul 19, 2016
#14-13.11%
Sep 16, 2021 - Nov 4, 2021
-15.80%
May 19, 2011 - Sep 16, 2011
#15-12.81%
Jan 29, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026
-15.60%
Aug 12, 2016 - Feb 8, 2017

Correlation

Correlation between AMAT and COST is 0.87 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.87
-101

Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)

AMAT vs COST dividend yield comparison.

YearAMATCOST
20260.18%0.30%
20250.69%0.59%
20240.93%0.49%
20230.75%2.87%
20221.05%0.76%
20210.60%0.54%
20201.01%3.38%
20191.36%0.86%
20182.14%1.08%
20170.78%4.81%
20161.24%1.09%
20152.14%4.06%
20141.61%0.97%
20132.21%1.01%
20123.06%8.17%
20112.89%1.11%
20101.92%1.10%
20091.72%1.18%
20082.37%1.19%
20071.30%0.81%
20060.98%0.96%
20050.50%0.90%
20040.00%0.62%

Select Stocks to Compare