COST vs LRCX
Comparison between Costco Wholesale Corp (COST, Company) and Lam Research Corp (LRCX, Company).
COST is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while LRCX is from the Technology sector.
5-Year PerformanceLRCX has outperformed COST, delivering a return of +39.7% compared to +18.8%
COST vs LRCX - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Market Cap
COST
$406B
Winner
LRCX
$419B
Max Drawdown
Winner
COST
53.39%
LRCX
87.90%
Sharpe Ratio
COST
-0.18
Winner
LRCX
2.21
5Y Beta
Winner
COST
0.39
LRCX
2.20
Industry
COST
Discount Stores
LRCX
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials
P/E Ratio
Winner
COST
46.00
LRCX
62.87
Forward P/E
COST
41.49
Winner
LRCX
39.53
PEG Ratio
COST
3.63
Winner
LRCX
1.32
Dividend Yield
Winner
COST
0.57%
LRCX
0.32%
5Y Dividends CAGR
COST
-12.35%
Winner
LRCX
19.55%
5Y EPS CAGR
COST
13.27%
Winner
LRCX
17.26%
Debt to Equity
COST
16.92%
Winner
LRCX
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
COST
2.17%
LRCX
1.66%
P/S Ratio
Winner
COST
1.39
LRCX
19.96
P/B Ratio
Winner
COST
12.26
LRCX
38.98
COST vs LRCX - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
Winner
COST
-2.33%
LRCX
-21.38%
3M
COST
-7.48%
Winner
LRCX
+24.71%
6M
COST
-5.19%
Winner
LRCX
+41.25%
1Y
COST
-1.38%
Winner
LRCX
+218.24%
5Y(CAGR)
COST
+18.76%
Winner
LRCX
+39.70%
10Y(CAGR)
COST
+20.75%
Winner
LRCX
+45.05%
Max(CAGR)
COST
+14.29%
Winner
LRCX
+20.26%
COST vs LRCX - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | COST | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +9.05% | +74.32% |
| 2025 | -4.72% | +138.45% |
| 2024 | +41.64% | -2.65% |
| 2023 | +50.03% | +91.34% |
| 2022 | -18.91% | -41.24% |
| 2021 | +50.47% | +51.81% |
| 2020 | +33.72% | +60.95% |
| 2019 | +44.95% | +115.94% |
| 2018 | +9.30% | -26.44% |
| 2017 | +22.66% | +73.68% |
| 2016 | +1.51% | +38.10% |
| 2015 | +19.11% | +1.37% |
| 2014 | +21.70% | +48.16% |
| 2013 | +18.56% | +40.59% |
| 2012 | +26.50% | -1.69% |
| 2011 | +16.31% | -25.86% |
| 2010 | +23.17% | +29.84% |
| 2009 | +12.51% | +77.90% |
| 2008 | -22.17% | -50.08% |
| 2007 | +33.29% | -12.60% |
| 2006 | +6.93% | +37.97% |
| 2005 | +4.29% | +28.39% |
| 2004 | +34.26% | -8.83% |
| 2003 | +28.16% | +177.25% |
| 2002 | -36.87% | -55.35% |
| 2001 | +7.74% | +61.47% |
| 2000 | -10.25% | -61.30% |
| 1999 | +16.15% | +35.68% |
COST vs LRCX Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for COST was -53.39%, occurring on Dec 24, 2002. Recovery took 1551 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for LRCX was -87.90%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 1664 trading sessions.
The current COST drawdown is -15.09%. The current LRCX drawdown is -25.69%.
| Rank | COST | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -53.39% May 1, 2000 - Jul 3, 2006 | -87.90% Apr 7, 2000 - Nov 20, 2006 |
| #2 | -48.03% Jul 8, 2008 - Dec 20, 2010 | -74.99% Jul 17, 2007 - May 23, 2014 |
| #3 | -31.40% Apr 7, 2022 - Dec 5, 2023 | -56.39% Jan 14, 2022 - Jul 28, 2023 |
| #4 | -22.02% Sep 11, 2018 - Apr 1, 2019 | -47.12% Jul 10, 2024 - Sep 11, 2025 |
| #5 | -20.74% Feb 13, 2025 - May 18, 2026 | -45.00% Mar 12, 2018 - Sep 4, 2019 |
| #6 | -20.65% Feb 3, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000 | -44.99% Feb 13, 2020 - Jul 10, 2020 |
| #7 | -19.49% Dec 1, 2020 - May 27, 2021 | -29.21% Jun 30, 2026 - Jul 20, 2026 |
| #8 | -18.54% Jul 3, 2006 - Feb 15, 2007 | -28.11% Mar 24, 2000 - Apr 7, 2000 |
| #9 | -17.43% Jun 7, 2017 - Nov 30, 2017 | -26.14% Mar 2, 2015 - Jun 1, 2016 |
| #10 | -16.57% May 19, 2026 - Jul 9, 2026 | -25.69% Nov 21, 2017 - Mar 9, 2018 |
| #11 | -16.23% Dec 7, 2007 - May 1, 2008 | -23.63% Aug 4, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020 |
| #12 | -15.93% Dec 29, 2021 - Mar 29, 2022 | -23.27% Nov 20, 2006 - Jul 17, 2007 |
| #13 | -15.86% Dec 8, 2015 - Jul 19, 2016 | -20.38% Nov 12, 1999 - Dec 6, 1999 |
| #14 | -15.80% May 19, 2011 - Sep 16, 2011 | -20.01% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026 |
| #15 | -15.60% Aug 12, 2016 - Feb 8, 2017 | -18.87% Jul 28, 2023 - Nov 20, 2023 |
Correlation
Correlation between COST and LRCX is 0.82 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
0.82
-101
Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)
COST vs LRCX dividend yield comparison.
| Year | COST | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.30% | 0.16% |
| 2025 | 0.59% | 0.57% |
| 2024 | 0.49% | 1.19% |
| 2023 | 2.87% | 0.95% |
| 2022 | 0.76% | 1.53% |
| 2021 | 0.54% | 0.78% |
| 2020 | 3.38% | 1.04% |
| 2019 | 0.86% | 1.54% |
| 2018 | 1.08% | 2.79% |
| 2017 | 4.81% | 1.01% |
| 2016 | 1.09% | 1.28% |
| 2015 | 4.06% | 1.36% |
| 2014 | 0.97% | 0.68% |
| 2013 | 1.01% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 8.17% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.11% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.10% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.18% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.19% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.81% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.96% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.90% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.62% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: COST vs SPYLRCX vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks
Compare COST with:
Compare LRCX with:
Popular suggestions:
AMAT vs LRCX
Applied Materials Inc vs Lam Research Corp
SKT vs COST
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers Inc vs Costco Wholesale Corp
LRCX vs ASML
Lam Research Corp vs ASML Holding NV
LPG vs COST
Dorian LPG Ltd vs Costco Wholesale Corp
MLI vs COST
Mueller Industries Inc vs Costco Wholesale Corp
BJ vs COST
BJ`s Wholesale Club Holdings Inc vs Costco Wholesale Corp
WMT vs COST
Walmart Inc vs Costco Wholesale Corp
PTC vs COST
PTC Inc vs Costco Wholesale Corp
TGT vs COST
Target Corp vs Costco Wholesale Corp