StockComparison Logo
vs

ALB vs RTO

Comparison between Albemarle Corp (ALB, Company) and Rentokil Initial (RTO, Company).

ALB is from the Basic Materials sector, while RTO is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceRTO has outperformed ALB, delivering a return of -2.3% compared to -6.3%

ALB vs RTO - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
ALB
$15B
Winner
RTO
$15B
Max Drawdown
Winner
ALB
84.40%
RTO
87.38%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
ALB
1.12
RTO
0.87
5Y Beta
ALB
1.61
Winner
RTO
0.71
Industry
ALB
Specialty Chemicals
RTO
Specialty Business Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
ALB
-65.26
RTO
13.66
Forward P/E
Winner
ALB
13.19
RTO
18.21
PEG Ratio
ALB
0.79
Winner
RTO
0.27
Dividend Yield
ALB
1.26%
Winner
RTO
2.09%
5Y Dividends CAGR
ALB
5.49%
Winner
RTO
12.75%
Debt to Equity
Winner
ALB
19.10%
RTO
111.54%
Free Cash Flow Yield
ALB
3.78%
Winner
RTO
10.83%
P/S Ratio
ALB
2.78
Winner
RTO
2.19
P/B Ratio
Winner
ALB
2.10
RTO
2.75

ALB vs RTO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
ALB
-26.15%
Winner
RTO
-3.49%
3M
ALB
-31.97%
Winner
RTO
-11.25%
6M
ALB
-28.50%
Winner
RTO
-4.70%
1Y
Winner
ALB
+77.45%
RTO
+31.00%
5Y(CAGR)
ALB
-6.29%
Winner
RTO
-2.29%
10Y(CAGR)
ALB
+5.34%
Winner
RTO
+9.69%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
ALB
+11.89%
RTO
+4.63%

ALB vs RTO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearALBRTO
2026-12.13%+0.28%
2025+69.37%+20.90%
2024-40.46%-5.45%
2023-32.07%-7.11%
2022-7.76%-21.80%
2021+54.41%+10.91%
2020+106.78%+18.47%
2019-4.60%+44.50%
2018-40.58%+2.83%
2017+46.84%+63.10%
2016+57.51%+19.30%
2015-4.95%+32.98%
2014-3.13%-0.42%
2013+0.06%+22.43%
2012+19.42%+59.12%
2011-6.62%-36.58%
2010+48.29%-18.85%
2009+60.40%+181.40%
2008-44.46%-71.04%
2007+15.81%-29.83%
2006+77.63%N/A
2005+2.50%N/A
2004+30.33%N/A
2003+7.05%N/A
2002+21.26%N/A
2001+5.14%N/A
2000+40.63%N/A
1999+0.87%N/A

ALB vs RTO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for ALB was -83.90%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for RTO was -86.60%, occurring on Dec 4, 2008. Recovery took 2336 trading sessions.

The current ALB drawdown is -59.29%. The current RTO drawdown is -25.19%.

RankALBRTO
#1-83.90%
Nov 11, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025
-86.60%
Nov 1, 2007 - Feb 13, 2017
#2-66.29%
Oct 31, 2007 - Apr 29, 2010
-50.87%
Nov 12, 2021 - Apr 7, 2025
#3-63.27%
Nov 8, 2017 - Nov 27, 2020
-42.03%
Mar 4, 2020 - Jul 14, 2020
#4-44.82%
May 10, 2011 - Nov 27, 2013
-23.45%
Jun 6, 2018 - Apr 4, 2019
#5-41.04%
Jul 14, 2014 - May 11, 2016
-19.60%
Oct 31, 2017 - May 21, 2018
#6-39.26%
Nov 22, 2021 - Aug 15, 2022
-13.39%
Jan 8, 2021 - Jul 29, 2021
#7-30.91%
Jun 10, 2002 - Jun 29, 2004
-12.62%
Nov 5, 2020 - Jan 8, 2021
#8-30.70%
Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 4, 2002
-11.27%
Jul 13, 2007 - Aug 31, 2007
#9-26.73%
Aug 16, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000
-9.98%
May 3, 2019 - Jul 3, 2019
#10-24.92%
Nov 15, 1999 - Mar 20, 2000
-8.87%
Jul 30, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
#11-24.05%
Jan 19, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021
-8.06%
Sep 22, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021
#12-22.55%
Sep 14, 2022 - Nov 10, 2022
-7.53%
Apr 17, 2017 - May 2, 2017
#13-20.14%
Apr 23, 2007 - Sep 26, 2007
-7.49%
Jul 24, 2019 - Aug 7, 2019
#14-18.86%
Dec 1, 2004 - Jan 3, 2006
-6.43%
Mar 2, 2017 - Mar 16, 2017
#15-15.62%
Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 30, 2010
-6.39%
Feb 21, 2020 - Mar 3, 2020

Correlation

Correlation between ALB and RTO is 0.81 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.81
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

ALB vs RTO dividend yield comparison.

YearALBRTO
20260.64%1.39%
20251.15%2.23%
20241.87%2.28%
20231.11%1.73%
20220.73%1.38%
20210.67%1.30%
20201.04%0.00%
20192.01%0.87%
20181.74%1.14%
20171.00%1.69%
20161.42%2.99%
20152.07%1.54%
20141.83%1.88%
20131.51%1.52%
20121.29%1.78%
20111.30%0.00%
20101.00%0.00%
20091.37%0.00%
20082.15%17.23%
20071.02%1.65%
20060.96%0.00%
20051.62%0.00%
20041.51%0.00%
20031.89%0.00%
20021.90%0.00%
20012.17%0.00%
20001.86%0.00%
19990.52%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare