ALB vs MAS
Comparison between Albemarle Corp (ALB, Company) and Masco Corp (MAS, Company).
ALB is from the Basic Materials sector, while MAS is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceMAS has outperformed ALB, delivering a return of +7.9% compared to -5.6%
ALB vs MAS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
ALB vs MAS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
ALB vs MAS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -10.10% | +21.84% |
| 2025 | +69.37% | -9.73% |
| 2024 | -40.46% | +10.72% |
| 2023 | -32.07% | +44.24% |
| 2022 | -7.76% | -31.33% |
| 2021 | +54.41% | +32.63% |
| 2020 | +106.78% | +15.09% |
| 2019 | -4.60% | +64.53% |
| 2018 | -40.58% | -32.50% |
| 2017 | +46.84% | +37.89% |
| 2016 | +57.51% | +15.17% |
| 2015 | -4.95% | +30.37% |
| 2014 | -3.13% | +12.68% |
| 2013 | +0.06% | +34.94% |
| 2012 | +19.42% | +55.28% |
| 2011 | -6.62% | -17.51% |
| 2010 | +48.29% | -9.36% |
| 2009 | +60.40% | +27.20% |
| 2008 | -44.46% | -44.06% |
| 2007 | +15.81% | -24.24% |
| 2006 | +77.63% | -1.51% |
| 2005 | +2.50% | -15.43% |
| 2004 | +30.33% | +38.81% |
| 2003 | +7.05% | +28.15% |
| 2002 | +21.26% | -12.05% |
| 2001 | +5.14% | +2.05% |
| 2000 | +40.63% | +4.53% |
| 1999 | +0.87% | -15.23% |
ALB vs MAS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ALB was -83.90%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for MAS was -88.73%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2636 trading sessions.
The current ALB drawdown is -58.34%. The current MAS drawdown is -6.30%.
| Rank | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -83.90% Nov 11, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025 | -88.73% Feb 4, 2005 - Jul 28, 2015 |
| #2 | -66.29% Oct 31, 2007 - Apr 29, 2010 | -50.73% Nov 3, 1999 - Dec 4, 2003 |
| #3 | -63.27% Nov 8, 2017 - Nov 27, 2020 | -44.83% Feb 5, 2020 - Jun 30, 2020 |
| #4 | -44.82% May 10, 2011 - Nov 27, 2013 | -40.14% Jan 18, 2018 - Oct 30, 2019 |
| #5 | -41.04% Jul 14, 2014 - May 11, 2016 | -37.98% Dec 29, 2021 - Dec 14, 2023 |
| #6 | -39.26% Nov 22, 2021 - Aug 15, 2022 | -30.95% Oct 18, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #7 | -30.91% Jun 10, 2002 - Jun 29, 2004 | -22.82% Nov 25, 2015 - Mar 17, 2016 |
| #8 | -30.70% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 4, 2002 | -19.94% Jul 28, 2016 - Apr 25, 2017 |
| #9 | -26.73% Aug 16, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000 | -17.63% Mar 28, 2024 - Aug 21, 2024 |
| #10 | -24.92% Nov 15, 1999 - Mar 20, 2000 | -17.34% May 10, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021 |
| #11 | -24.05% Jan 19, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021 | -13.56% Sep 2, 2020 - Mar 26, 2021 |
| #12 | -22.55% Sep 14, 2022 - Nov 10, 2022 | -13.30% Aug 18, 2015 - Oct 27, 2015 |
| #13 | -20.14% Apr 23, 2007 - Sep 26, 2007 | -11.53% Mar 30, 2004 - Jun 23, 2004 |
| #14 | -18.86% Dec 1, 2004 - Jan 3, 2006 | -10.51% Apr 20, 2016 - Jul 11, 2016 |
| #15 | -15.62% Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 30, 2010 | -7.54% Dec 8, 2003 - Mar 1, 2004 |
Correlation
Correlation between ALB and MAS is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
ALB vs MAS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ALB | MAS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.63% | 0.82% |
| 2025 | 1.15% | 1.95% |
| 2024 | 1.87% | 1.60% |
| 2023 | 1.11% | 1.70% |
| 2022 | 0.73% | 2.40% |
| 2021 | 0.67% | 1.20% |
| 2020 | 1.04% | 0.99% |
| 2019 | 2.01% | 1.03% |
| 2018 | 1.74% | 1.49% |
| 2017 | 1.00% | 0.92% |
| 2016 | 1.42% | 1.22% |
| 2015 | 2.07% | 12.68% |
| 2014 | 1.83% | 1.31% |
| 2013 | 1.51% | 1.32% |
| 2012 | 1.29% | 1.80% |
| 2011 | 1.30% | 2.86% |
| 2010 | 1.00% | 2.37% |
| 2009 | 1.37% | 3.33% |
| 2008 | 2.15% | 8.31% |
| 2007 | 1.02% | 4.21% |
| 2006 | 0.96% | 2.88% |
| 2005 | 1.62% | 2.58% |
| 2004 | 1.51% | 1.81% |
| 2003 | 1.89% | 2.12% |
| 2002 | 1.90% | 2.59% |
| 2001 | 2.17% | 2.14% |
| 2000 | 1.86% | 1.91% |
| 1999 | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks