ALB vs FMS
Comparison between Albemarle Corp (ALB, Company) and Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS, Company).
ALB is from the Basic Materials sector, while FMS is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceALB has outperformed FMS, delivering a return of -6.8% compared to -7.5%
ALB vs FMS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
ALB vs FMS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
ALB vs FMS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ALB | FMS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -16.63% | +6.66% |
| 2025 | +69.37% | +10.46% |
| 2024 | -40.46% | +9.62% |
| 2023 | -32.07% | +32.75% |
| 2022 | -7.76% | -48.69% |
| 2021 | +54.41% | -22.15% |
| 2020 | +106.78% | +14.17% |
| 2019 | -4.60% | +14.97% |
| 2018 | -40.58% | -37.35% |
| 2017 | +46.84% | +25.11% |
| 2016 | +57.51% | +3.00% |
| 2015 | -4.95% | +15.27% |
| 2014 | -3.13% | +7.92% |
| 2013 | +0.06% | +4.68% |
| 2012 | +19.42% | -1.60% |
| 2011 | -6.62% | +19.12% |
| 2010 | +48.29% | +6.92% |
| 2009 | +60.40% | +12.89% |
| 2008 | -44.46% | -9.60% |
| 2007 | +15.81% | +17.56% |
| 2006 | +77.63% | +24.19% |
| 2005 | +2.50% | +32.87% |
| 2004 | +30.33% | +13.43% |
| 2003 | +7.05% | +75.69% |
| 2002 | +21.26% | -32.86% |
| 2001 | +5.14% | -28.05% |
| 2000 | +40.63% | -1.41% |
| 1999 | +0.87% | +20.10% |
ALB vs FMS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ALB was -83.90%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for FMS was -76.71%, occurring on Sep 19, 2002. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.
The current ALB drawdown is -61.37%. The current FMS drawdown is -48.23%.
| Rank | ALB | FMS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -83.90% Nov 11, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025 | -76.71% Sep 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2005 |
| #2 | -66.29% Oct 31, 2007 - Apr 29, 2010 | -75.62% Jan 31, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 |
| #3 | -63.27% Nov 8, 2017 - Nov 27, 2020 | -39.57% Jul 10, 2008 - Aug 17, 2010 |
| #4 | -44.82% May 10, 2011 - Nov 27, 2013 | -24.50% Dec 1, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 |
| #5 | -41.04% Jul 14, 2014 - May 11, 2016 | -20.91% Jul 26, 2011 - Feb 25, 2015 |
| #6 | -39.26% Nov 22, 2021 - Aug 15, 2022 | -20.16% Jan 10, 2008 - Jul 3, 2008 |
| #7 | -30.91% Jun 10, 2002 - Jun 29, 2004 | -19.10% Aug 9, 2016 - May 31, 2017 |
| #8 | -30.70% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 4, 2002 | -15.76% May 2, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 |
| #9 | -26.73% Aug 16, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000 | -14.90% Jul 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 |
| #10 | -24.92% Nov 15, 1999 - Mar 20, 2000 | -13.95% Nov 2, 2015 - Jul 28, 2016 |
| #11 | -24.05% Jan 19, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021 | -12.99% Mar 1, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005 |
| #12 | -22.55% Sep 14, 2022 - Nov 10, 2022 | -12.90% Oct 14, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 |
| #13 | -20.14% Apr 23, 2007 - Sep 26, 2007 | -11.81% May 8, 2007 - Sep 12, 2007 |
| #14 | -18.86% Dec 1, 2004 - Jan 3, 2006 | -10.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 25, 2011 |
| #15 | -15.62% Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 30, 2010 | -9.92% Jun 14, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between ALB and FMS is 0.41 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
ALB vs FMS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ALB | FMS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.68% | 3.62% |
| 2025 | 1.15% | 3.30% |
| 2024 | 1.87% | 2.80% |
| 2023 | 1.11% | 2.97% |
| 2022 | 0.73% | 4.34% |
| 2021 | 0.67% | 2.57% |
| 2020 | 1.04% | 1.72% |
| 2019 | 2.01% | 1.78% |
| 2018 | 1.74% | 1.95% |
| 2017 | 1.00% | 0.70% |
| 2016 | 1.42% | 0.74% |
| 2015 | 2.07% | 0.71% |
| 2014 | 1.83% | 0.99% |
| 2013 | 1.51% | 0.94% |
| 2012 | 1.29% | 0.91% |
| 2011 | 1.30% | 0.96% |
| 2010 | 1.00% | 0.93% |
| 2009 | 1.37% | 1.06% |
| 2008 | 2.15% | 1.38% |
| 2007 | 1.02% | 0.91% |
| 2006 | 0.96% | 0.93% |
| 2005 | 1.62% | 1.06% |
| 2004 | 1.51% | 1.22% |
| 2003 | 1.89% | 1.24% |
| 2002 | 1.90% | 1.49% |
| 2001 | 2.17% | 0.81% |
| 2000 | 1.86% | 0.58% |
| 1999 | 0.52% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks