ZIM vs TR
Comparison between Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM, Company) and Tootsie Roll Industries Inc (TR, Company).
ZIM is from the Industrials sector, while TR is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceZIM has outperformed TR, delivering a return of +18.9% compared to +7.6%
ZIM vs TR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
ZIM vs TR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
ZIM vs TR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ZIM | TR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +19.16% | +9.03% |
| 2025 | +16.70% | +16.86% |
| 2024 | +141.16% | -2.47% |
| 2023 | -22.74% | -19.68% |
| 2022 | -51.08% | +21.55% |
| 2021 | +459.56% | +26.33% |
| 2020 | N/A | -10.90% |
| 2019 | N/A | +6.75% |
| 2018 | N/A | -6.65% |
| 2017 | N/A | -4.41% |
| 2016 | N/A | +33.73% |
| 2015 | N/A | +8.65% |
| 2014 | N/A | -0.01% |
| 2013 | N/A | +26.61% |
| 2012 | N/A | +16.12% |
| 2011 | N/A | -16.19% |
| 2010 | N/A | +8.91% |
| 2009 | N/A | +11.00% |
| 2008 | N/A | +1.74% |
| 2007 | N/A | -14.82% |
| 2006 | N/A | +19.67% |
| 2005 | N/A | -8.09% |
| 2004 | N/A | -0.84% |
| 2003 | N/A | +22.04% |
| 2002 | N/A | -17.53% |
| 2001 | N/A | -9.94% |
| 2000 | N/A | +44.18% |
| 1999 | N/A | +4.91% |
ZIM vs TR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ZIM was -85.01%, occurring on Nov 28, 2023. Recovery took 979 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TR was -44.81%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 2718 trading sessions.
The current ZIM drawdown is -11.56%. The current TR drawdown is -16.54%.
| Rank | ZIM | TR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -85.01% Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 17, 2026 | -44.81% May 29, 2002 - Mar 15, 2013 |
| #2 | -29.26% Jun 25, 2021 - Aug 24, 2021 | -36.40% Feb 6, 2023 - Oct 1, 2025 |
| #3 | -28.59% Sep 16, 2021 - Dec 30, 2021 | -30.35% Dec 20, 2016 - Apr 24, 2019 |
| #4 | -18.27% Mar 19, 2021 - Apr 8, 2021 | -30.34% Jan 27, 2021 - Oct 25, 2022 |
| #5 | -17.91% May 5, 2021 - May 19, 2021 | -29.07% Feb 7, 2001 - May 13, 2002 |
| #6 | -13.81% May 28, 2021 - Jun 11, 2021 | -27.17% May 22, 2019 - Jan 27, 2021 |
| #7 | -13.55% Feb 19, 2021 - Mar 11, 2021 | -22.49% Aug 1, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 |
| #8 | -11.94% May 5, 2026 - May 21, 2026 | -20.03% Oct 16, 2025 - Mar 9, 2026 |
| #9 | -10.17% Jan 14, 2022 - Jan 28, 2022 | -17.05% Oct 6, 2000 - Dec 20, 2000 |
| #10 | -9.86% May 19, 2021 - May 28, 2021 | -16.54% Apr 9, 2026 - May 26, 2026 |
| #11 | -9.85% Apr 16, 2021 - Apr 23, 2021 | -14.29% Nov 3, 1999 - May 15, 2000 |
| #12 | -9.02% Jun 11, 2021 - Jun 24, 2021 | -12.69% Jun 9, 2016 - Dec 8, 2016 |
| #13 | -8.71% Feb 20, 2026 - May 5, 2026 | -12.16% Mar 23, 2015 - Mar 4, 2016 |
| #14 | -8.67% Feb 10, 2022 - Mar 3, 2022 | -10.93% Aug 17, 2000 - Oct 6, 2000 |
| #15 | -8.63% Apr 9, 2021 - Apr 16, 2021 | -10.35% Jan 26, 2015 - Mar 20, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between ZIM and TR is 0.36 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
ZIM vs TR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ZIM | TR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.49% | 0.24% |
| 2025 | 20.16% | 0.98% |
| 2024 | 22.40% | 1.11% |
| 2023 | 64.84% | 1.08% |
| 2022 | 160.27% | 0.85% |
| 2021 | 7.65% | 0.99% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 1.05% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 0.99% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 0.91% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 1.11% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 1.04% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 0.98% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 3.16% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.35% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.11% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 1.17% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 1.51% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.57% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 3.90% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 4.39% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 0.81% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 0.78% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 0.91% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.72% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.41% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.12% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks