ZBH vs KIM
Comparison between Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc (ZBH, Company) and Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM, Company).
ZBH is from the Healthcare sector, while KIM is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceKIM has outperformed ZBH, delivering a return of +6.3% compared to -12.5%
ZBH vs KIM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
ZBH vs KIM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
ZBH vs KIM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | ZBH | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -8.30% | +18.36% |
| 2025 | -13.07% | -7.49% |
| 2024 | -12.24% | +15.19% |
| 2023 | -3.65% | +5.65% |
| 2022 | +2.54% | -10.54% |
| 2021 | -16.52% | +77.51% |
| 2020 | +4.09% | -19.32% |
| 2019 | +47.42% | +50.49% |
| 2018 | -15.68% | -13.05% |
| 2017 | +17.71% | -24.40% |
| 2016 | +2.23% | +1.38% |
| 2015 | -8.12% | +8.04% |
| 2014 | +24.01% | +32.30% |
| 2013 | +39.03% | +5.34% |
| 2012 | +24.96% | +21.03% |
| 2011 | -2.82% | -7.63% |
| 2010 | -10.56% | +37.72% |
| 2009 | +41.55% | -19.52% |
| 2008 | -39.03% | -46.82% |
| 2007 | -14.20% | -16.33% |
| 2006 | +14.46% | +42.03% |
| 2005 | -15.04% | +16.39% |
| 2004 | +14.46% | +35.26% |
| 2003 | +74.69% | +51.95% |
| 2002 | +37.35% | -1.45% |
| 2001 | +2.62% | +18.99% |
| 2000 | N/A | +39.39% |
| 1999 | N/A | +1.58% |
ZBH vs KIM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for ZBH was -65.03%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1652 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for KIM was -85.66%, occurring on Mar 30, 2009. Recovery took 3817 trading sessions.
The current ZBH drawdown is -50.49%. The current KIM drawdown is -2.94%.
| Rank | ZBH | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -65.03% Apr 26, 2007 - Nov 14, 2013 | -85.66% Feb 21, 2007 - Apr 19, 2022 |
| #2 | -51.85% Apr 29, 2021 - Apr 29, 2026 | -33.66% Apr 28, 2022 - Sep 11, 2024 |
| #3 | -49.73% Feb 14, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021 | -25.89% Nov 27, 2024 - Apr 17, 2026 |
| #4 | -40.49% Jul 7, 2004 - Apr 17, 2007 | -20.79% Apr 1, 2004 - Sep 3, 2004 |
| #5 | -26.23% Aug 9, 2016 - Jul 14, 2017 | -15.35% Apr 12, 2002 - Feb 14, 2003 |
| #6 | -26.04% Sep 28, 2018 - Jul 26, 2019 | -15.12% Mar 29, 2006 - Aug 22, 2006 |
| #7 | -24.07% Feb 24, 2015 - May 24, 2016 | -14.00% Aug 2, 2005 - Dec 23, 2005 |
| #8 | -20.18% Jul 17, 2017 - Sep 28, 2018 | -11.20% Nov 3, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000 |
| #9 | -19.22% Mar 4, 2002 - Jul 30, 2002 | -10.77% Aug 21, 2001 - Oct 9, 2001 |
| #10 | -16.43% Aug 7, 2001 - Oct 16, 2001 | -10.28% Dec 30, 2004 - May 18, 2005 |
| #11 | -14.52% Mar 21, 2003 - Aug 6, 2003 | -9.97% Dec 6, 2001 - Apr 10, 2002 |
| #12 | -12.07% Nov 7, 2002 - Feb 18, 2003 | -7.86% Jan 10, 2000 - Mar 16, 2000 |
| #13 | -10.91% Jun 6, 2014 - Oct 28, 2014 | -7.84% Jan 3, 2001 - Apr 26, 2001 |
| #14 | -10.74% Mar 8, 2004 - Apr 16, 2004 | -7.03% Jul 25, 2000 - Dec 5, 2000 |
| #15 | -10.05% Dec 6, 2001 - Jan 30, 2002 | -6.74% Sep 4, 2003 - Nov 6, 2003 |
Correlation
Correlation between ZBH and KIM is 0.65 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
ZBH vs KIM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | ZBH | KIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.29% | 1.11% |
| 2025 | 1.07% | 4.98% |
| 2024 | 0.91% | 4.14% |
| 2023 | 0.79% | 4.79% |
| 2022 | 0.75% | 3.97% |
| 2021 | 0.76% | 2.76% |
| 2020 | 0.62% | 3.60% |
| 2019 | 0.64% | 5.41% |
| 2018 | 0.93% | 7.65% |
| 2017 | 0.80% | 6.01% |
| 2016 | 0.93% | 4.11% |
| 2015 | 0.86% | 3.68% |
| 2014 | 0.78% | 3.64% |
| 2013 | 0.86% | 4.33% |
| 2012 | 1.08% | 4.04% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 4.50% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 3.66% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 5.32% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 9.19% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 4.18% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 3.07% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.96% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 4.00% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 4.89% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 6.85% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 6.00% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 6.16% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.95% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks