XHLF vs ETG
Comparison between BONDBLOXX BLOOMBERG SIX MONTH TARGET DURATION US TREASURY ETF (XHLF, ETF) and Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund (ETG, ETF).
XHLF vs ETG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
XHLF
$1.90B
Winner
ETG
$2B
Expense Ratio
XHLF
0.03%
ETG
N/A
Max Drawdown
Winner
XHLF
0.62%
ETG
78.34%
Sharpe Ratio
XHLF
0.47
Winner
ETG
1.08
5Y Beta
Winner
XHLF
-0.00
ETG
0.93
5Y Dividends CAGR
XHLF
N/A
ETG
6.45%
XHLF vs ETG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
XHLF
+0.32%
Winner
ETG
+2.84%
3M
XHLF
+0.90%
Winner
ETG
+10.65%
6M
XHLF
+1.69%
Winner
ETG
+7.01%
1Y
XHLF
+3.89%
Winner
ETG
+20.56%
5Y(CAGR)
XHLF
N/A
ETG
+9.70%
10Y(CAGR)
XHLF
N/A
ETG
+13.25%
Max(CAGR)
XHLF
+4.44%
Winner
ETG
+8.78%
XHLF vs ETG - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | XHLF | ETG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.43% | +3.02% |
| 2025 | +4.21% | +36.72% |
| 2024 | +5.06% | +17.24% |
| 2023 | +4.90% | +21.74% |
| 2022 | +0.96% | -27.67% |
| 2021 | N/A | +35.89% |
| 2020 | N/A | +9.86% |
| 2019 | N/A | +40.82% |
| 2018 | N/A | -15.13% |
| 2017 | N/A | +30.28% |
| 2016 | N/A | +0.10% |
| 2015 | N/A | +3.39% |
| 2014 | N/A | +3.25% |
| 2013 | N/A | +30.36% |
| 2012 | N/A | +18.06% |
| 2011 | N/A | -7.33% |
| 2010 | N/A | +10.83% |
| 2009 | N/A | +36.82% |
| 2008 | N/A | -54.78% |
| 2007 | N/A | +10.23% |
| 2006 | N/A | +33.94% |
| 2005 | N/A | +11.43% |
| 2004 | N/A | +5.75% |
XHLF vs ETG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for XHLF was -0.11%, occurring on Oct 19, 2022. Recovery took 13 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ETG was -74.70%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1624 trading sessions.
The current ETG drawdown is -1.45%.
| Rank | XHLF | ETG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -0.11% Oct 10, 2022 - Oct 27, 2022 | -74.70% Jul 13, 2007 - Dec 23, 2013 |
| #2 | -0.09% Mar 13, 2023 - Mar 15, 2023 | -51.49% Feb 20, 2020 - Dec 16, 2020 |
| #3 | -0.07% Mar 17, 2023 - Mar 23, 2023 | -31.58% Jan 3, 2022 - Jun 27, 2024 |
| #4 | -0.07% Mar 24, 2023 - Apr 4, 2023 | -29.50% Sep 21, 2018 - Oct 24, 2019 |
| #5 | -0.07% Dec 23, 2022 - Dec 29, 2022 | -24.65% Jun 2, 2015 - Mar 1, 2017 |
| #6 | -0.07% Oct 28, 2022 - Nov 8, 2022 | -20.78% Feb 6, 2004 - Nov 23, 2004 |
| #7 | -0.06% Apr 5, 2023 - Apr 20, 2023 | -16.96% Feb 19, 2025 - May 2, 2025 |
| #8 | -0.06% Mar 3, 2023 - Mar 10, 2023 | -16.65% Feb 2, 2026 - May 28, 2026 |
| #9 | -0.06% Feb 2, 2023 - Feb 10, 2023 | -13.58% Jul 7, 2014 - Mar 24, 2015 |
| #10 | -0.06% Feb 1, 2024 - Feb 8, 2024 | -10.28% Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024 |
| #11 | -0.06% Aug 5, 2024 - Aug 12, 2024 | -10.10% Jan 23, 2018 - Jul 24, 2018 |
| #12 | -0.06% Oct 2, 2024 - Oct 11, 2024 | -9.98% Dec 20, 2006 - Apr 4, 2007 |
| #13 | -0.06% Mar 15, 2023 - Mar 17, 2023 | -6.88% Sep 12, 2005 - Nov 3, 2005 |
| #14 | -0.04% Mar 1, 2024 - Mar 7, 2024 | -6.87% Jun 4, 2007 - Jul 13, 2007 |
| #15 | -0.04% May 9, 2025 - May 16, 2025 | -6.71% Jan 22, 2014 - Feb 21, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between XHLF and ETG is 0.96 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
0.96
-101
Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)
XHLF vs ETG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | XHLF | ETG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.52% | 2.80% |
| 2025 | 3.99% | 6.72% |
| 2024 | 4.96% | 8.03% |
| 2023 | 4.50% | 7.02% |
| 2022 | 0.86% | 9.94% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 6.02% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 6.74% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 6.83% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 9.08% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 7.69% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 8.74% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 7.93% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 7.61% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 6.66% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 8.30% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 9.23% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 7.99% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 8.21% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 15.86% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 5.72% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 5.22% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 6.36% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 6.23% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: XHLF vs SPYETG vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks