StockComparison Logo
vs

XEL vs FAST

Comparison between Xcel Energy Inc (XEL, Company) and Fastenal Company (FAST, Company).

XEL is from the Utilities sector, while FAST is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceFAST has outperformed XEL, delivering a return of +13.6% compared to +5.7%

XEL vs FAST - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
XEL
$50B
Winner
FAST
$50B
Max Drawdown
XEL
82.11%
Winner
FAST
52.82%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
XEL
0.87
FAST
0.37
5Y Beta
Winner
XEL
0.13
FAST
0.67
Industry
XEL
Utilities - Regulated Electric
FAST
Industrial Distribution
P/E Ratio
Winner
XEL
23.24
FAST
38.59
Forward P/E
Winner
XEL
19.57
FAST
36.10
PEG Ratio
XEL
12.73
Winner
FAST
3.04
Dividend Yield
Winner
XEL
2.88%
FAST
2.06%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
XEL
10.45%
FAST
4.74%
5Y EPS CAGR
XEL
3.44%
Winner
FAST
8.43%
Debt to Equity
XEL
155.56%
Winner
FAST
3.13%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
XEL
9.53%
FAST
2.28%
P/S Ratio
Winner
XEL
3.37
FAST
5.92
P/B Ratio
Winner
XEL
2.09
FAST
12.57

XEL vs FAST - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
XEL
+3.80%
FAST
-1.41%
3M
XEL
-2.02%
Winner
FAST
-1.94%
6M
XEL
+3.29%
Winner
FAST
+11.30%
1Y
Winner
XEL
+20.84%
FAST
+10.20%
5Y(CAGR)
XEL
+5.68%
Winner
FAST
+13.60%
10Y(CAGR)
XEL
+10.66%
Winner
FAST
+17.68%
Max(CAGR)
XEL
+9.45%
Winner
FAST
+17.03%

XEL vs FAST - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearXELFAST
2026+9.36%+9.84%
2025+15.02%+15.29%
2024+9.53%+15.68%
2023-8.64%+41.04%
2022+6.09%-21.79%
2021+6.01%+37.36%
2020+9.75%+35.54%
2019+35.24%+47.52%
2018+6.51%-1.30%
2017+22.13%+19.74%
2016+17.83%+20.37%
2015+3.26%-11.52%
2014+35.56%+4.13%
2013+6.12%+1.00%
2012+1.58%+9.69%
2011+22.24%+46.16%
2010+16.87%+46.28%
2009+18.49%+16.36%
2008-12.20%-8.77%
2007+0.34%+13.39%
2006+29.75%-7.40%
2005+7.26%+30.04%
2004+12.30%+24.26%
2003+56.70%+29.03%
2002-57.91%+13.63%
2001+3.25%+27.80%
2000+62.64%+29.55%
1999-8.93%+25.71%

XEL vs FAST Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for XEL was -80.65%, occurring on Jul 29, 2002. Recovery took 1449 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FAST was -51.96%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 396 trading sessions.

The current XEL drawdown is -2.67%. The current FAST drawdown is -11.38%.

RankXELFAST
#1-80.65%
Apr 26, 2001 - Feb 2, 2007
-51.96%
Sep 16, 2008 - Apr 14, 2010
#2-34.43%
Sep 12, 2022 - Nov 26, 2024
-36.84%
Apr 25, 2002 - Sep 17, 2003
#3-30.32%
Apr 2, 2007 - Apr 6, 2010
-34.80%
Aug 9, 2007 - May 2, 2008
#4-29.24%
Feb 18, 2020 - Aug 7, 2020
-34.79%
May 16, 2000 - May 22, 2001
#5-24.35%
Nov 2, 1999 - Apr 24, 2000
-31.96%
May 9, 2006 - Jul 16, 2007
#6-21.81%
Nov 16, 2020 - Mar 29, 2022
-30.70%
Dec 29, 2021 - Dec 6, 2023
#7-17.45%
Nov 14, 2017 - Oct 24, 2018
-29.53%
Apr 2, 2012 - Mar 21, 2016
#8-16.38%
Dec 26, 2000 - Mar 29, 2001
-27.78%
Feb 20, 2020 - May 8, 2020
#9-15.66%
May 27, 2022 - Aug 12, 2022
-27.40%
Jan 27, 2000 - Apr 10, 2000
#10-14.77%
May 24, 2000 - Aug 2, 2000
-26.49%
May 22, 2001 - Feb 13, 2002
#11-14.61%
Jan 29, 2015 - Oct 22, 2015
-22.43%
Mar 21, 2016 - Dec 7, 2016
#12-14.33%
Jul 6, 2016 - Mar 21, 2017
-22.35%
Mar 6, 2017 - Nov 29, 2017
#13-13.40%
Apr 30, 2013 - Apr 4, 2014
-21.90%
Aug 22, 2025 - Nov 20, 2025
#14-12.70%
May 20, 2011 - Sep 15, 2011
-20.37%
Mar 21, 2024 - Oct 16, 2024
#15-12.37%
Nov 27, 2024 - Apr 3, 2025
-19.50%
Sep 2, 2004 - Jul 19, 2005

Correlation

Correlation between XEL and FAST is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.93
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

XEL vs FAST dividend yield comparison.

YearXELFAST
20260.73%1.09%
20253.83%2.18%
20242.43%2.17%
20233.36%2.75%
20222.78%2.62%
20212.70%1.75%
20202.58%2.87%
20192.55%2.35%
20183.09%2.95%
20172.99%2.34%
20163.34%2.55%
20153.56%2.74%
20143.34%2.10%
20133.97%1.68%
20124.01%2.66%
20113.74%1.49%
20104.26%2.07%
20094.58%1.73%
20085.08%2.27%
20074.04%1.09%
20063.83%1.11%
20054.62%0.79%
20044.45%0.65%
20034.42%0.42%
200210.23%0.13%
20015.41%0.13%
20005.10%0.15%
19991.86%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare