WTW vs SQM
Comparison between Willis Towers Watson Public Ltd Company (WTW, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).
WTW is from the Financial Services sector, while SQM is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed WTW, delivering a return of +16.5% compared to +0.7%
WTW vs SQM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
WTW vs SQM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
WTW vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | WTW | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -22.82% | +13.96% |
| 2025 | +7.44% | +91.19% |
| 2024 | +32.16% | -38.56% |
| 2023 | -0.16% | -15.40% |
| 2022 | +5.38% | +70.49% |
| 2021 | +18.07% | +2.60% |
| 2020 | +4.60% | +87.42% |
| 2019 | +36.78% | -27.79% |
| 2018 | +4.99% | -35.04% |
| 2017 | +24.06% | +113.53% |
| 2016 | -1.28% | +61.04% |
| 2015 | N/A | -20.43% |
| 2014 | N/A | -1.99% |
| 2013 | N/A | -54.46% |
| 2012 | N/A | +7.62% |
| 2011 | N/A | -7.72% |
| 2010 | N/A | +53.00% |
| 2009 | N/A | +51.16% |
| 2008 | N/A | +46.55% |
| 2007 | N/A | +33.91% |
| 2006 | N/A | +23.39% |
| 2005 | N/A | +82.30% |
| 2004 | N/A | +52.01% |
| 2003 | N/A | +94.94% |
| 2002 | N/A | -8.87% |
| 2001 | N/A | +19.25% |
| 2000 | N/A | -10.37% |
| 1999 | N/A | +9.77% |
WTW vs SQM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for WTW was -32.95%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 253 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The current WTW drawdown is -27.84%. The current SQM drawdown is -19.97%.
| Rank | WTW | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -32.95% Feb 5, 2020 - Feb 5, 2021 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 |
| #2 | -30.39% Oct 7, 2025 - May 13, 2026 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #3 | -28.42% May 7, 2021 - Feb 6, 2024 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 |
| #4 | -16.94% Jul 25, 2018 - Jan 31, 2019 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 |
| #5 | -14.87% Jan 5, 2016 - May 2, 2016 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 |
| #6 | -12.94% Mar 27, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 |
| #7 | -12.49% Jun 9, 2016 - Sep 22, 2016 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 |
| #8 | -12.04% Sep 30, 2016 - Apr 25, 2017 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 |
| #9 | -10.70% Mar 9, 2018 - Jul 25, 2018 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 |
| #10 | -10.07% Oct 23, 2017 - Jan 26, 2018 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #11 | -9.76% Feb 23, 2024 - Jul 25, 2024 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 |
| #12 | -7.71% Jul 29, 2019 - Dec 13, 2019 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 |
| #13 | -7.54% Dec 4, 2024 - Feb 25, 2025 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #14 | -7.20% Jan 26, 2018 - Mar 9, 2018 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 |
| #15 | -7.04% Mar 5, 2019 - Apr 26, 2019 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 |
Correlation
Correlation between WTW and SQM is 0.49 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
WTW vs SQM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | WTW | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.38% | 1.31% |
| 2025 | 1.12% | 0.18% |
| 2024 | 1.12% | 0.59% |
| 2023 | 1.39% | 8.34% |
| 2022 | 1.34% | 9.66% |
| 2021 | 1.27% | 3.92% |
| 2020 | 1.31% | 1.64% |
| 2019 | 1.29% | 4.55% |
| 2018 | 1.58% | 5.37% |
| 2017 | 1.41% | 2.73% |
| 2016 | 1.57% | 4.77% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 4.71% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 3.21% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 1.69% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.40% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.70% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 3.71% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.76% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.49% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.88% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.16% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 42.10% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks