WMS vs FCFS
Comparison between Advanced Drainage Systems Inc (WMS, Company) and FirstCash Holdings Inc (FCFS, Company).
WMS is from the Industrials sector, while FCFS is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceFCFS has outperformed WMS, delivering a return of +25.2% compared to +4.8%
WMS vs FCFS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
WMS vs FCFS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
WMS vs FCFS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | WMS | FCFS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -6.10% | +48.16% |
| 2025 | +27.38% | +57.22% |
| 2024 | -15.82% | -1.89% |
| 2023 | +73.91% | +24.87% |
| 2022 | -38.78% | +18.97% |
| 2021 | +69.49% | +13.47% |
| 2020 | +114.18% | -12.96% |
| 2019 | +67.92% | +13.51% |
| 2018 | +2.36% | +7.83% |
| 2017 | +15.31% | +44.66% |
| 2016 | -8.96% | +28.45% |
| 2015 | +5.56% | -31.18% |
| 2014 | +42.54% | -10.08% |
| 2013 | N/A | +23.26% |
| 2012 | N/A | +41.73% |
| 2011 | N/A | +9.42% |
| 2010 | N/A | +36.58% |
| 2009 | N/A | +15.51% |
| 2008 | N/A | +34.60% |
| 2007 | N/A | -41.79% |
| 2006 | N/A | +78.23% |
| 2005 | N/A | +9.62% |
| 2004 | N/A | +53.28% |
| 2003 | N/A | +140.76% |
| 2002 | N/A | +40.82% |
| 2001 | N/A | +210.80% |
| 2000 | N/A | -71.88% |
| 1999 | N/A | -10.81% |
WMS vs FCFS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for WMS was -53.57%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 115 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FCFS was -82.10%, occurring on Nov 15, 2000. Recovery took 613 trading sessions.
The current WMS drawdown is -20.93%. The current FCFS drawdown is -0.54%.
| Rank | WMS | FCFS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -53.57% Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 3, 2020 | -82.10% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 |
| #2 | -50.13% Aug 16, 2022 - Feb 8, 2024 | -71.13% Dec 28, 2006 - Sep 24, 2010 |
| #3 | -45.75% May 21, 2024 - Apr 8, 2025 | -52.47% Nov 29, 2013 - Sep 25, 2017 |
| #4 | -44.28% Jun 18, 2015 - Aug 27, 2018 | -50.15% Jul 24, 2019 - Apr 27, 2023 |
| #5 | -39.94% Dec 8, 2021 - Aug 4, 2022 | -38.17% Dec 23, 2004 - Nov 3, 2005 |
| #6 | -29.58% Aug 30, 2018 - Jun 20, 2019 | -34.05% Jun 3, 2002 - Dec 17, 2002 |
| #7 | -14.85% Feb 24, 2021 - Apr 12, 2021 | -34.00% Sep 19, 2011 - Jan 17, 2013 |
| #8 | -13.76% Jan 7, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021 | -31.86% Apr 8, 2004 - Nov 10, 2004 |
| #9 | -13.50% Aug 3, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021 | -27.76% Jun 6, 2018 - Apr 25, 2019 |
| #10 | -13.23% Oct 12, 2020 - Dec 2, 2020 | -24.68% Apr 18, 2006 - Oct 16, 2006 |
| #11 | -12.43% Apr 16, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021 | -23.38% Apr 23, 2024 - Apr 24, 2025 |
| #12 | -12.26% Aug 8, 2019 - Oct 9, 2019 | -22.18% Dec 17, 2002 - Apr 17, 2003 |
| #13 | -10.72% Mar 31, 2015 - May 13, 2015 | -16.67% Sep 24, 2003 - Oct 22, 2003 |
| #14 | -10.43% Nov 12, 2014 - Jan 8, 2015 | -16.18% Mar 28, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013 |
| #15 | -9.96% Oct 23, 2014 - Nov 6, 2014 | -15.30% May 5, 2023 - Oct 17, 2023 |
Correlation
Correlation between WMS and FCFS is 0.73 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2014 - 2026)
WMS vs FCFS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | WMS | FCFS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.13% | 0.36% |
| 2025 | 0.48% | 1.00% |
| 2024 | 0.54% | 1.41% |
| 2023 | 0.38% | 1.25% |
| 2022 | 0.57% | 1.45% |
| 2021 | 0.31% | 1.56% |
| 2020 | 0.43% | 1.54% |
| 2019 | 3.48% | 1.27% |
| 2018 | 1.28% | 1.26% |
| 2017 | 1.13% | 1.14% |
| 2016 | 1.12% | 1.20% |
| 2015 | 0.79% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 0.17% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks