WGO vs CGBD
Comparison between Winnebago Industries Inc (WGO, Company) and Carlyle Secured Lending Inc (CGBD, Company).
WGO is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while CGBD is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceCGBD has outperformed WGO, delivering a return of +7.3% compared to -13.2%
WGO vs CGBD - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
WGO vs CGBD - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
WGO vs CGBD - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | WGO | CGBD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -26.14% | -9.31% |
| 2025 | -12.51% | -22.30% |
| 2024 | -33.33% | +33.98% |
| 2023 | +41.31% | +15.85% |
| 2022 | -29.34% | +17.64% |
| 2021 | +23.42% | +49.86% |
| 2020 | +14.56% | -8.93% |
| 2019 | +115.36% | +17.77% |
| 2018 | -55.91% | -25.29% |
| 2017 | +71.56% | +18.03% |
| 2016 | +67.46% | N/A |
| 2015 | -7.52% | N/A |
| 2014 | -19.06% | N/A |
| 2013 | +51.32% | N/A |
| 2012 | +125.69% | N/A |
| 2011 | -52.29% | N/A |
| 2010 | +23.08% | N/A |
| 2009 | +93.04% | N/A |
| 2008 | -70.02% | N/A |
| 2007 | -34.28% | N/A |
| 2006 | +1.47% | N/A |
| 2005 | -11.90% | N/A |
| 2004 | +16.01% | N/A |
| 2003 | +68.44% | N/A |
| 2002 | +5.92% | N/A |
| 2001 | +118.22% | N/A |
| 2000 | -8.86% | N/A |
| 1999 | +13.98% | N/A |
WGO vs CGBD Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for WGO was -91.48%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 3027 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CGBD was -71.12%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 804 trading sessions.
The current WGO drawdown is -62.02%. The current CGBD drawdown is -30.95%.
| Rank | WGO | CGBD |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -91.48% Dec 13, 2004 - Dec 20, 2016 | -71.12% Dec 29, 2017 - Mar 12, 2021 |
| #2 | -67.12% Feb 20, 2020 - Jun 4, 2020 | -35.08% Jan 31, 2025 - Mar 16, 2026 |
| #3 | -65.22% Dec 18, 2017 - Jan 23, 2020 | -18.93% Aug 12, 2022 - Nov 15, 2022 |
| #4 | -64.80% Mar 17, 2021 - Jun 25, 2025 | -17.72% Apr 19, 2022 - Aug 11, 2022 |
| #5 | -51.20% Nov 25, 2002 - Sep 2, 2003 | -13.98% Feb 24, 2023 - Jul 7, 2023 |
| #6 | -49.77% Feb 28, 2000 - Jun 8, 2001 | -12.77% Jul 28, 2023 - Dec 13, 2023 |
| #7 | -38.54% Jun 29, 2001 - Nov 30, 2001 | -12.20% Jul 16, 2024 - Dec 11, 2024 |
| #8 | -36.21% Jun 23, 2020 - Jan 26, 2021 | -9.75% Oct 3, 2017 - Dec 27, 2017 |
| #9 | -34.89% Mar 4, 2002 - Nov 25, 2002 | -7.87% Apr 29, 2021 - Aug 4, 2021 |
| #10 | -33.68% Dec 20, 2016 - Aug 1, 2017 | -5.55% Jan 8, 2024 - Feb 27, 2024 |
| #11 | -30.16% Jan 23, 2004 - Jun 22, 2004 | -5.32% Aug 12, 2021 - Oct 19, 2021 |
| #12 | -23.26% Jun 23, 2004 - Nov 15, 2004 | -4.84% Nov 5, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022 |
| #13 | -13.25% Oct 30, 2003 - Dec 8, 2003 | -4.47% Jan 12, 2022 - Mar 2, 2022 |
| #14 | -12.54% Jan 28, 2002 - Feb 20, 2002 | -3.91% Mar 2, 2022 - Mar 17, 2022 |
| #15 | -11.63% Jan 24, 2000 - Feb 28, 2000 | -3.68% Jan 3, 2025 - Jan 16, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between WGO and CGBD is 0.22 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
WGO vs CGBD dividend yield comparison.
| Year | WGO | CGBD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.59% | 3.64% |
| 2025 | 3.38% | 13.21% |
| 2024 | 2.66% | 10.43% |
| 2023 | 1.54% | 11.76% |
| 2022 | 1.54% | 11.46% |
| 2021 | 0.72% | 10.92% |
| 2020 | 0.75% | 14.33% |
| 2019 | 0.83% | 13.00% |
| 2018 | 1.65% | 13.55% |
| 2017 | 0.72% | 6.09% |
| 2016 | 1.26% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 1.86% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 0.41% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 5.97% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 2.09% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.15% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.96% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.74% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.51% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.54% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 1.14% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks