StockComparison Logo
vs

WFC vs IBM

Comparison between Wells Fargo & Company (WFC, Company) and International Business Machines Corp (IBM, Company).

WFC is from the Financial Services sector, while IBM is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceIBM has outperformed WFC, delivering a return of +17.5% compared to +15.6%

WFC vs IBM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
WFC
$258B
IBM
$247B
Max Drawdown
WFC
79.60%
Winner
IBM
58.79%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
WFC
0.38
IBM
-0.15
5Y Beta
WFC
0.96
Winner
IBM
0.76
Industry
WFC
Banks - Diversified
IBM
Information Technology Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
WFC
12.17
IBM
39.50
Forward P/E
Winner
WFC
11.98
IBM
21.23
PEG Ratio
Winner
WFC
0.80
IBM
1.48
Dividend Yield
WFC
2.08%
Winner
IBM
2.54%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
WFC
40.63%
IBM
6.14%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
WFC
32.94%
IBM
-8.16%
Debt to Equity
Winner
WFC
121.20%
IBM
201.25%
Free Cash Flow Yield
WFC
0.46%
Winner
IBM
5.23%
P/S Ratio
Winner
WFC
3.18
IBM
3.59
P/B Ratio
Winner
WFC
1.58
IBM
7.50

WFC vs IBM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
WFC
+9.31%
IBM
+3.02%
3M
WFC
+6.21%
Winner
IBM
+7.78%
6M
Winner
WFC
-10.12%
IBM
-14.08%
1Y
Winner
WFC
+9.52%
IBM
-8.98%
5Y(CAGR)
WFC
+15.57%
Winner
IBM
+17.51%
10Y(CAGR)
WFC
+9.36%
Winner
IBM
+10.86%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
WFC
+7.83%
IBM
+6.59%

WFC vs IBM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearWFCIBM
2026-10.03%-10.23%
2025+35.66%+38.19%
2024+46.15%+41.04%
2023+21.46%+21.31%
2022-16.66%+8.77%
2021+63.73%+18.53%
2020-41.61%-2.20%
2019+19.18%+21.92%
2018-22.36%-22.96%
2017+11.39%-4.67%
2016+7.53%+26.73%
2015+2.07%-12.30%
2014+25.14%-11.43%
2013+33.32%-2.62%
2012+23.48%+4.56%
2011-11.23%+26.80%
2010+14.23%+12.95%
2009-7.77%+52.78%
2008+5.69%-18.18%
2007-12.57%+12.70%
2006+15.04%+19.97%
2005+4.88%-15.12%
2004+10.32%+8.51%
2003+24.92%+15.90%
2002+10.33%-35.76%
2001-17.66%+43.32%
2000+45.45%-26.39%
1999-13.36%+11.64%

WFC vs IBM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for WFC was -78.98%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1122 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for IBM was -58.31%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 1929 trading sessions.

The current WFC drawdown is -11.14%. The current IBM drawdown is -21.55%.

RankWFCIBM
#1-78.98%
Sep 19, 2008 - Mar 7, 2013
-58.31%
Sep 1, 2000 - May 8, 2008
#2-64.47%
Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 8, 2022
-44.28%
Jul 22, 2008 - Oct 12, 2009
#3-43.56%
Oct 5, 2007 - Sep 18, 2008
-43.71%
Mar 14, 2013 - Nov 10, 2022
#4-37.07%
Feb 9, 2022 - Mar 4, 2024
-30.96%
Nov 12, 2025 - Jun 1, 2026
#5-35.23%
Nov 16, 1999 - Jun 2, 2000
-24.34%
Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 18, 2026
#6-29.24%
Dec 28, 2000 - Jul 14, 2003
-20.10%
Mar 27, 2000 - Aug 25, 2000
#7-24.73%
Feb 6, 2025 - Jul 1, 2025
-19.81%
Jun 30, 2025 - Oct 7, 2025
#8-23.01%
Jan 6, 2026 - May 15, 2026
-17.60%
Dec 13, 2022 - Aug 25, 2023
#9-22.43%
Jul 22, 2015 - Dec 7, 2016
-17.41%
Jan 21, 2000 - Mar 27, 2000
#10-19.77%
Jun 2, 2000 - Oct 3, 2000
-16.86%
Mar 12, 2024 - Aug 19, 2024
#11-16.65%
May 15, 2024 - Oct 14, 2024
-16.51%
Feb 20, 2025 - May 15, 2025
#12-15.81%
Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 5, 2017
-14.56%
Jul 19, 2011 - Oct 10, 2011
#13-12.69%
Oct 3, 2000 - Nov 9, 2000
-12.90%
Oct 14, 2024 - Dec 4, 2024
#14-11.11%
Nov 26, 2024 - Jan 21, 2025
-12.24%
Apr 3, 2012 - Oct 1, 2012
#15-10.33%
Sep 19, 2014 - Nov 3, 2014
-11.69%
Oct 16, 2012 - Mar 7, 2013

Correlation

Correlation between WFC and IBM is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.91
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

WFC vs IBM dividend yield comparison.

YearWFCIBM
20261.06%1.30%
20251.82%2.27%
20242.14%3.03%
20232.64%4.05%
20222.66%4.68%
20211.25%4.74%
20204.04%5.17%
20193.57%4.80%
20183.56%5.46%
20172.54%3.85%
20162.75%3.31%
20152.71%3.63%
20142.46%2.65%
20132.53%1.97%
20122.57%1.72%
20111.74%1.58%
20100.65%1.70%
20091.82%1.64%
20084.41%2.26%
20073.91%1.39%
20063.04%1.13%
20053.18%0.95%
20042.99%0.71%
20032.55%0.68%
20022.35%0.76%
20012.30%0.45%
20001.62%0.60%
19990.49%0.11%

Select Stocks to Compare