VNM vs PCQ

Comparison between VANECK VIETNAM ETF (VNM, ETF) and Pimco California Municipal Income Fund (PCQ, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceVNM has outperformed PCQ, delivering a return of -1.2% compared to -10.1%

VNM vs PCQ - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	VNM(ETF)	PCQ(ETF)
Net Assets	$565M	$566M
Expense Ratio	0.66%	N/A
Max Drawdown	69.75%	60.60%
Sharpe Ratio	0.31	0.82
5Y Beta	0.77	0.14
5Y Dividends CAGR	-27.59%	-11.37%

Net Assets

VNM

$565M

Winner

PCQ

$566M

Expense Ratio

VNM

0.66%

PCQ

N/A

Max Drawdown

VNM

69.75%

Winner

PCQ

60.60%

Sharpe Ratio

VNM

0.31

Winner

PCQ

0.82

5Y Beta

VNM

0.77

Winner

PCQ

0.14

5Y Dividends CAGR

VNM

-27.59%

Winner

PCQ

-11.37%

VNM vs PCQ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	VNM	PCQ
1 month	-9.22%	-0.73%
3 months	-10.23%	+1.34%
6 months	-12.69%	+1.19%
1 year	+10.52%	+10.33%
5 years(CAGR)	-1.16%	-10.08%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.48%	-1.80%
Max(CAGR)	-0.95%	+3.73%

VNM

-9.22%

Winner

PCQ

-0.73%

VNM

-10.23%

Winner

PCQ

+1.34%

VNM

-12.69%

Winner

PCQ

+1.19%

Winner

VNM

+10.52%

PCQ

+10.33%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

VNM

-1.16%

PCQ

-10.08%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

VNM

+2.48%

PCQ

-1.80%

Max(CAGR)

VNM

-0.95%

Winner

PCQ

+3.73%

VNM vs PCQ - Annual Returns (2001 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	VNM	PCQ
2026	-11.41%	+2.99%
2025	+65.39%	+0.17%
2024	-9.75%	+1.28%
2023	+10.66%	-36.42%
2022	-43.81%	-15.26%
2021	+21.63%	+7.87%
2020	+8.01%	-6.19%
2019	+8.14%	+26.15%
2018	-17.39%	-1.10%
2017	+36.46%	+16.44%
2016	-10.75%	+5.62%
2015	-19.15%	+6.94%
2014	+6.30%	+26.59%
2013	+2.36%	-14.10%
2012	+24.62%	+25.62%
2011	-46.32%	+18.97%
2010	-1.77%	+6.14%
2009	-1.90%	+45.10%
2008	N/A	-41.29%
2007	N/A	-3.73%
2006	N/A	+16.83%
2005	N/A	+24.28%
2004	N/A	+8.38%
2003	N/A	+0.07%
2002	N/A	+2.59%
2001	N/A	+0.78%

VNM vs PCQ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for VNM was -63.25%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for PCQ was -56.28%, occurring on Dec 16, 2008. Recovery took 839 trading sessions.

The current VNM drawdown is -30.97%. The current PCQ drawdown is -45.05%.

Rank	VNM	PCQ
#1	-63.25% Oct 22, 2009 - Mar 23, 2020	-56.28% May 11, 2007 - Sep 9, 2010
#2	-6.44% Aug 21, 2009 - Sep 9, 2009	-54.86% Nov 12, 2021 - Oct 6, 2023
#3	-5.51% Sep 21, 2009 - Oct 9, 2009	-37.82% Dec 9, 2019 - Jul 15, 2021
#4	-3.04% Aug 14, 2009 - Aug 19, 2009	-22.43% Jan 23, 2013 - Nov 20, 2014
#5	-2.23% Oct 15, 2009 - Oct 19, 2009	-17.69% Oct 15, 2010 - Sep 29, 2011
#6	-1.78% Oct 19, 2009 - Oct 22, 2009	-17.09% Dec 11, 2017 - Jul 9, 2018
#7	-0.87% Sep 16, 2009 - Sep 21, 2009	-14.13% Aug 13, 2018 - Jan 28, 2019
#8	-0.82% Oct 12, 2009 - Oct 14, 2009	-13.13% Sep 8, 2016 - May 8, 2017
#9	N/A	-12.06% Jun 13, 2003 - Apr 1, 2004
#10	N/A	-11.35% Feb 2, 2015 - Oct 20, 2015
#11	N/A	-10.17% Jul 11, 2012 - Nov 28, 2012
#12	N/A	-9.02% Jan 30, 2012 - Apr 24, 2012
#13	N/A	-8.76% Apr 1, 2004 - Aug 6, 2004
#14	N/A	-8.05% Sep 13, 2002 - May 22, 2003
#15	N/A	-7.19% Aug 16, 2001 - Aug 6, 2002

Correlation

Correlation between VNM and PCQ is -0.19 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.19

-101

Dividend Comparison (2001 - 2026)

VNM vs PCQ dividend yield comparison.

Year	VNM	PCQ
2026	0.00%	2.88%
2025	0.20%	4.95%
2024	0.00%	4.78%
2023	5.21%	4.64%
2022	0.96%	5.29%
2021	0.49%	4.20%
2020	0.40%	4.39%
2019	0.76%	4.65%
2018	0.83%	5.72%
2017	1.14%	5.35%
2016	2.44%	5.89%
2015	3.69%	5.89%
2014	2.65%	5.90%
2013	3.19%	7.10%
2012	2.04%	5.80%
2011	1.12%	6.87%
2010	1.31%	7.45%
2009	0.14%	7.46%
2008	0.00%	10.68%
2007	0.00%	5.95%
2006	0.00%	5.25%
2005	0.00%	5.83%
2004	0.00%	6.83%
2003	0.00%	6.90%
2002	0.00%	6.45%
2001	0.00%	2.53%