StockComparison Logo
vs

VIV vs SQM

Comparison between Telefonica Brasil S.A. (VIV, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).

VIV is from the Communication Services sector, while SQM is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceVIV has outperformed SQM, delivering a return of +18.2% compared to +13.7%

VIV vs SQM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
VIV
$21B
SQM
$21B
Max Drawdown
VIV
82.53%
Winner
SQM
80.45%
Sharpe Ratio
VIV
0.84
Winner
SQM
1.52
5Y Beta
Winner
VIV
0.40
SQM
1.04
Industry
VIV
Telecom Services
SQM
Specialty Chemicals
P/E Ratio
Winner
VIV
17.82
SQM
25.99
Forward P/E
VIV
12.52
Winner
SQM
10.80
PEG Ratio
VIV
0.79
Winner
SQM
0.73
Dividend Yield
Winner
VIV
7.11%
SQM
1.38%
5Y Dividends CAGR
VIV
13.95%
Winner
SQM
15.24%
5Y EPS CAGR
VIV
8.54%
Winner
SQM
32.32%
Debt to Equity
Winner
VIV
28.59%
SQM
88.99%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
VIV
10.11%
SQM
5.09%
P/S Ratio
Winner
VIV
0.35
SQM
4.01
P/B Ratio
Winner
VIV
1.60
SQM
3.59

VIV vs SQM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
VIV
+5.22%
SQM
-2.08%
3M
VIV
-16.92%
Winner
SQM
-8.82%
6M
Winner
VIV
+15.67%
SQM
+0.71%
1Y
VIV
+27.01%
Winner
SQM
+95.21%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
VIV
+18.24%
SQM
+13.71%
10Y(CAGR)
VIV
+7.18%
Winner
SQM
+15.64%
Max(CAGR)
VIV
+7.64%
Winner
SQM
+17.56%

VIV vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearVIVSQM
2026+19.12%+7.45%
2025+64.98%+91.19%
2024-25.16%-38.56%
2023+76.51%-15.40%
2022-10.74%+70.49%
2021+5.21%+2.60%
2020-32.31%+87.42%
2019+21.65%-27.79%
2018-13.67%-35.04%
2017+19.26%+113.53%
2016+56.05%+61.04%
2015-44.59%-20.43%
2014-0.41%-1.99%
2013-14.25%-54.46%
2012-12.20%+7.62%
2011+24.53%-7.72%
2010+4.02%+53.00%
2009+35.76%+51.16%
2008-16.36%+46.55%
2007+9.38%+33.91%
2006+27.44%+23.39%
2005+15.47%+82.30%
2004+22.52%+52.01%
2003+99.52%+94.94%
2002-27.79%-8.87%
2001+12.17%+19.25%
2000-34.72%-10.37%
1999+51.61%+9.77%

VIV vs SQM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for VIV was -77.91%, occurring on Sep 26, 2001. Recovery took 1477 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.

The current VIV drawdown is -17.99%. The current SQM drawdown is -24.54%.

RankVIVSQM
#1-77.91%
Mar 3, 2000 - Jan 19, 2006
-78.36%
Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017
#2-67.51%
Apr 9, 2012 - Aug 15, 2025
-73.00%
Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021
#3-45.49%
Jul 19, 2007 - Apr 6, 2011
-72.14%
Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010
#4-25.06%
Feb 16, 2006 - Dec 13, 2006
-69.81%
Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025
#5-23.39%
Apr 10, 2026 - Jun 18, 2026
-35.54%
Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002
#6-18.67%
Aug 31, 2011 - Mar 13, 2012
-31.32%
Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006
#7-15.51%
Jul 29, 2011 - Aug 31, 2011
-30.96%
Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021
#8-12.97%
Feb 6, 2007 - Apr 26, 2007
-29.41%
Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022
#9-12.25%
Nov 28, 2025 - Jan 22, 2026
-27.46%
Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004
#10-11.93%
Dec 29, 1999 - Jan 7, 2000
-26.31%
May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022
#11-10.17%
Feb 27, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026
-26.31%
Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008
#12-8.49%
Apr 21, 2011 - May 25, 2011
-24.67%
May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003
#13-8.44%
Feb 14, 2000 - Mar 3, 2000
-19.95%
Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
#14-8.03%
Jun 2, 2011 - Jul 26, 2011
-19.89%
Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022
#15-8.00%
Nov 11, 1999 - Nov 23, 1999
-19.15%
Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between VIV and SQM is 0.65 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.65
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

VIV vs SQM dividend yield comparison.

YearVIVSQM
20267.30%1.39%
20255.25%0.18%
20246.60%0.59%
20235.55%8.34%
20225.86%9.66%
20216.44%3.92%
202010.22%1.64%
20195.25%4.55%
20189.20%5.37%
201710.87%2.73%
20164.09%4.77%
201510.07%2.00%
20146.63%4.71%
201310.19%3.21%
20123.59%1.69%
201110.81%1.40%
20107.51%0.87%
20095.13%2.70%
200811.08%3.71%
200712.51%2.01%
20063.74%1.76%
20058.28%1.49%
20042.83%1.21%
200317.51%1.20%
20025.54%1.88%
200115.31%2.16%
200017.28%42.10%

Select Stocks to Compare