StockComparison Logo
vs

USB vs MAR

Comparison between U.S. Bancorp. (USB, Company) and Marriott International Inc - Class A (MAR, Company).

USB is from the Financial Services sector, while MAR is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceMAR has outperformed USB, delivering a return of +22.2% compared to +6.7%

USB vs MAR - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
USB
$98B
Winner
MAR
$98B
Max Drawdown
USB
76.78%
Winner
MAR
75.92%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
USB
1.61
MAR
1.16
5Y Beta
Winner
USB
0.96
MAR
1.00
Industry
USB
Banks - Regional
MAR
Lodging
P/E Ratio
Winner
USB
13.13
MAR
35.84
Forward P/E
Winner
USB
12.47
MAR
31.75
PEG Ratio
Winner
USB
0.62
MAR
3.12
Dividend Yield
Winner
USB
3.29%
MAR
0.73%
5Y Dividends CAGR
USB
8.96%
MAR
N/A
5Y EPS CAGR
USB
1.81%
Winner
MAR
18.24%
Debt to Equity
USB
27.15%
Winner
MAR
-0.56%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
USB
9.80%
MAR
2.61%
P/S Ratio
Winner
USB
3.63
MAR
13.33
P/B Ratio
Winner
USB
1.65
MAR
443.63

USB vs MAR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
USB
+9.51%
MAR
-4.26%
3M
Winner
USB
+13.05%
MAR
-1.84%
6M
Winner
USB
+17.00%
MAR
+15.19%
1Y
Winner
USB
+44.69%
MAR
+36.64%
5Y(CAGR)
USB
+6.71%
Winner
MAR
+22.23%
10Y(CAGR)
USB
+8.17%
Winner
MAR
+19.07%
Max(CAGR)
USB
+6.65%
Winner
MAR
+13.59%

USB vs MAR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearUSBMAR
2026+20.34%+17.81%
2025+16.41%+14.15%
2024+13.90%+26.99%
2023+2.32%+54.22%
2022-20.67%-8.61%
2021+25.58%+32.44%
2020-17.76%-12.57%
2019+31.73%+42.97%
2018-13.09%-17.84%
2017+6.43%+66.58%
2016+26.94%+28.56%
2015-2.55%-12.70%
2014+15.22%+61.32%
2013+25.53%+29.17%
2012+18.63%+25.92%
2011+2.40%-25.46%
2010+18.85%+51.27%
2009-9.92%+38.07%
2008-15.09%-40.31%
2007-7.84%-27.32%
2006+24.66%+42.26%
2005+0.40%+7.74%
2004+11.29%+37.37%
2003+43.93%+36.79%
2002+7.14%-17.17%
2001-5.32%-0.38%
2000+39.78%+39.42%
1999-34.20%-5.62%

USB vs MAR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for USB was -76.09%, occurring on Mar 6, 2009. Recovery took 1019 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for MAR was -75.59%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1649 trading sessions.

The current USB drawdown is -0.47%. The current MAR drawdown is -8.63%.

RankUSBMAR
#1-76.09%
Sep 19, 2008 - Oct 4, 2012
-75.59%
Apr 18, 2007 - Nov 1, 2013
#2-53.51%
Nov 16, 1999 - Jul 14, 2003
-61.26%
Dec 26, 2019 - Feb 24, 2021
#3-52.12%
Jan 14, 2022 - Dec 10, 2025
-46.10%
May 22, 2001 - May 21, 2004
#4-51.99%
Dec 17, 2019 - Apr 9, 2021
-30.92%
Jan 29, 2018 - Dec 12, 2019
#5-34.05%
May 1, 2008 - Sep 16, 2008
-30.50%
Feb 10, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025
#6-23.25%
Jan 26, 2018 - Jul 23, 2019
-30.49%
Mar 2, 2015 - Dec 7, 2016
#7-18.57%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 25, 2008
-29.95%
Apr 20, 2022 - Jul 10, 2023
#8-17.63%
Aug 10, 2015 - Oct 27, 2016
-25.38%
Nov 15, 1999 - May 15, 2000
#9-16.21%
Feb 6, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026
-19.21%
Feb 16, 2022 - Apr 19, 2022
#10-13.67%
Dec 31, 2003 - Aug 18, 2004
-19.15%
Jan 23, 2001 - May 2, 2001
#11-12.58%
Oct 22, 2021 - Jan 12, 2022
-18.03%
Apr 11, 2024 - Oct 9, 2024
#12-12.36%
Dec 31, 2004 - Nov 11, 2005
-17.47%
Jul 11, 2005 - Apr 4, 2006
#13-12.01%
May 17, 2021 - Oct 5, 2021
-17.46%
Feb 24, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021
#14-11.44%
Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017
-17.13%
Jul 27, 2000 - Nov 14, 2000
#15-11.31%
Oct 4, 2012 - May 20, 2013
-15.38%
Nov 8, 2021 - Feb 8, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between USB and MAR is 0.88 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.88
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

USB vs MAR dividend yield comparison.

YearUSBMAR
20261.63%0.38%
20253.82%0.85%
20244.14%0.86%
20234.46%0.87%
20224.31%0.67%
20213.13%0.00%
20203.61%0.36%
20192.66%1.22%
20182.93%1.44%
20172.16%0.95%
20162.08%1.39%
20152.37%1.42%
20142.15%0.99%
20132.19%1.30%
20122.44%1.31%
20111.85%7.28%
20100.74%0.50%
20090.89%1.27%
20086.80%1.74%
20075.12%0.84%
20063.84%0.50%
20054.12%0.60%
20044.58%0.52%
20032.87%0.64%
20023.68%0.84%
20013.58%0.78%
20004.87%0.55%
19991.33%0.17%

Select Stocks to Compare