UMI vs ETB

Comparison between USCF MIDSTREAM ENERGY INCOME FUND (UMI, ETF) and Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Income Fund (ETB, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceUMI has outperformed ETB, delivering a return of +20.4% compared to +7.3%

UMI vs ETB - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	UMI(ETF)	ETB(ETF)
Net Assets	$484M	$485M
Expense Ratio	0.69%	N/A
Max Drawdown	48.38%	59.40%
Sharpe Ratio	1.46	1.23
5Y Beta	0.48	0.75
P/E Ratio	21.86	N/A
Forward P/E	16.85	N/A
PEG Ratio	1.03	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	52.37%	1.20%
5Y EPS CAGR	16.48%	N/A
P/S Ratio	0.99	N/A
P/B Ratio	3.38	N/A

Net Assets

UMI

$484M

Winner

ETB

$485M

Expense Ratio

UMI

0.69%

ETB

N/A

Max Drawdown

Winner

UMI

48.38%

ETB

59.40%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

UMI

1.46

ETB

1.23

5Y Beta

Winner

UMI

0.48

ETB

0.75

P/E Ratio

UMI

21.86

ETB

N/A

Forward P/E

UMI

16.85

ETB

N/A

PEG Ratio

UMI

1.03

ETB

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

UMI

52.37%

ETB

1.20%

5Y EPS CAGR

UMI

16.48%

ETB

N/A

P/S Ratio

UMI

0.99

ETB

N/A

P/B Ratio

UMI

3.38

ETB

N/A

UMI vs ETB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	UMI	ETB
1 month	-0.02%	-0.54%
3 months	+2.97%	+1.71%
6 months	+20.74%	+4.06%
1 year	+25.35%	+18.75%
5 years(CAGR)	+20.36%	+7.29%
10 years(CAGR)	+14.46%	+8.33%
Max(CAGR)	+14.46%	+8.10%

Winner

UMI

-0.02%

ETB

-0.54%

Winner

UMI

+2.97%

ETB

+1.71%

Winner

UMI

+20.74%

ETB

+4.06%

Winner

UMI

+25.35%

ETB

+18.75%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

UMI

+20.36%

ETB

+7.29%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

UMI

+14.46%

ETB

+8.33%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

UMI

+14.46%

ETB

+8.10%

UMI vs ETB - Annual Returns (2005 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	UMI	ETB
2026	+21.24%	+3.33%
2025	+3.31%	+11.50%
2024	+42.49%	+26.79%
2023	+17.14%	+7.26%
2022	+18.48%	-17.06%
2021	+23.24%	+26.64%
2020	-8.24%	+0.51%
2019	+20.99%	+29.45%
2018	-10.64%	-12.67%
2017	+2.76%	+12.37%
2016	N/A	+8.92%
2015	N/A	+13.83%
2014	N/A	+16.83%
2013	N/A	+11.61%
2012	N/A	+19.91%
2011	N/A	-3.08%
2010	N/A	-4.88%
2009	N/A	+46.53%
2008	N/A	-19.08%
2007	N/A	-8.12%
2006	N/A	+26.09%
2005	N/A	-4.99%

UMI vs ETB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for UMI was -48.08%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 279 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for ETB was -50.92%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 578 trading sessions.

The current UMI drawdown is -4.38%. The current ETB drawdown is -2.31%.

Rank	UMI	ETB
#1	-48.08% Jan 21, 2020 - Mar 1, 2021	-50.92% Jun 1, 2007 - Sep 16, 2009
#2	-20.05% Jun 7, 2022 - Aug 11, 2023	-45.03% Feb 19, 2020 - Mar 17, 2021
#3	-18.75% Aug 27, 2018 - Nov 6, 2019	-25.67% Mar 24, 2010 - Jul 13, 2012
#4	-17.08% Jan 21, 2025 - Jan 27, 2026	-24.54% Sep 20, 2018 - Apr 29, 2019
#5	-13.87% Jun 16, 2021 - Oct 12, 2021	-23.45% Mar 22, 2022 - Jul 12, 2024
#6	-13.83% Oct 20, 2021 - Feb 1, 2022	-20.10% Jan 23, 2025 - Aug 6, 2025
#7	-13.75% Mar 15, 2021 - May 5, 2021	-17.38% Dec 29, 2015 - Apr 12, 2016
#8	-10.27% Nov 29, 2024 - Jan 16, 2025	-14.19% Jan 14, 2010 - Mar 10, 2010
#9	-9.24% Apr 20, 2022 - Jun 1, 2022	-13.97% Oct 15, 2012 - Jan 15, 2013
#10	-8.77% Jan 23, 2018 - Jul 9, 2018	-12.26% Aug 2, 2005 - Mar 13, 2006
#11	-8.16% May 5, 2021 - Jun 4, 2021	-11.06% Jul 28, 2014 - Oct 31, 2014
#12	-6.66% May 19, 2026 - May 29, 2026	-10.54% Aug 19, 2015 - Nov 23, 2015
#13	-6.21% Mar 26, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026	-9.17% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 15, 2026
#14	-6.19% Mar 4, 2022 - Mar 24, 2022	-9.02% Jan 12, 2022 - Feb 16, 2022
#15	-5.87% Feb 11, 2022 - Feb 28, 2022	-8.93% Jan 12, 2018 - Jul 17, 2018

Correlation

Correlation between UMI and ETB is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.93

-101

Dividend Comparison (2005 - 2026)

UMI vs ETB dividend yield comparison.

Year	UMI	ETB
2026	2.14%	3.47%
2025	6.23%	8.31%
2024	4.39%	8.21%
2023	4.67%	8.62%
2022	4.36%	9.63%
2021	3.00%	7.57%
2020	2.18%	8.64%
2019	2.47%	7.90%
2018	2.48%	9.64%
2017	0.15%	7.75%
2016	0.00%	7.85%
2015	0.00%	7.77%
2014	0.00%	8.15%
2013	0.00%	8.70%
2012	0.00%	9.24%
2011	0.00%	10.09%
2010	0.00%	12.49%
2009	0.00%	10.68%
2008	0.00%	14.37%
2007	0.00%	10.33%
2006	0.00%	8.53%
2005	0.00%	4.96%