UMDD vs CIF

Comparison between PROSHARES ULTRAPRO MIDCAP400 (UMDD, ETF) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceUMDD has outperformed CIF, delivering a return of +1.3% compared to -2.7%

UMDD vs CIF - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	UMDD(ETF)	CIF(ETF)
Net Assets	$32M	$32M
Max Drawdown	86.39%	81.79%
Sharpe Ratio	1.14	0.12
5Y Beta	2.95	0.37
5Y Dividends CAGR	76.71%	-5.06%

Net Assets

UMDD

$32M

CIF

$32M

Max Drawdown

UMDD

86.39%

Winner

CIF

81.79%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

UMDD

1.14

CIF

0.12

5Y Beta

UMDD

2.95

Winner

CIF

0.37

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

UMDD

76.71%

CIF

-5.06%

UMDD vs CIF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	UMDD	CIF
1 month	+1.61%	+0.58%
3 months	+13.68%	-1.33%
6 months	+28.68%	-3.68%
1 year	+60.24%	+3.85%
5 years(CAGR)	+1.33%	-2.66%
10 years(CAGR)	+11.15%	+5.33%
Max(CAGR)	+18.88%	+5.16%

Winner

UMDD

+1.61%

CIF

+0.58%

Winner

UMDD

+13.68%

CIF

-1.33%

Winner

UMDD

+28.68%

CIF

-3.68%

Winner

UMDD

+60.24%

CIF

+3.85%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

UMDD

+1.33%

CIF

-2.66%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

UMDD

+11.15%

CIF

+5.33%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

UMDD

+18.88%

CIF

+5.16%

UMDD vs CIF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	UMDD	CIF
2026	+26.46%	-1.40%
2025	-2.11%	+8.33%
2024	+20.82%	+12.73%
2023	+28.47%	+10.84%
2022	-49.98%	-32.26%
2021	+81.33%	+17.82%
2020	-17.44%	-1.49%
2019	+80.06%	+40.61%
2018	-40.78%	-20.42%
2017	+46.68%	+25.24%
2016	+65.85%	+25.28%
2015	-12.64%	-4.06%
2014	+27.19%	-1.18%
2013	+104.60%	+0.11%
2012	+45.14%	+15.31%
2011	-30.67%	+9.14%
2010	+89.42%	+16.96%
2009	N/A	+83.46%
2008	N/A	-40.75%
2007	N/A	-3.87%
2006	N/A	+21.77%
2005	N/A	-4.82%
2004	N/A	+7.57%
2003	N/A	+35.49%
2002	N/A	-11.82%
2001	N/A	-15.43%
2000	N/A	-5.59%
1999	N/A	-8.79%

UMDD vs CIF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for UMDD was -86.25%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 625 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CIF was -65.14%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.

The current UMDD drawdown is -10.25%. The current CIF drawdown is -22.44%.

Rank	UMDD	CIF
#1	-86.25% Aug 29, 2018 - Feb 24, 2021	-65.14% May 15, 2007 - Dec 15, 2009
#2	-65.66% Apr 29, 2011 - Feb 8, 2013	-45.21% Feb 18, 2020 - Apr 12, 2021
#3	-64.60% Nov 16, 2021 - Oct 27, 2023	-44.91% Jul 1, 2021 - Sep 27, 2022
#4	-50.75% Jun 23, 2015 - Nov 15, 2016	-44.38% Sep 7, 2000 - Feb 8, 2005
#5	-47.01% Apr 23, 2010 - Dec 2, 2010	-24.70% Jan 25, 2018 - Apr 18, 2019
#6	-29.86% Jul 1, 2014 - Nov 24, 2014	-21.59% May 1, 2015 - Jul 12, 2016
#7	-27.23% Jan 23, 2018 - Aug 21, 2018	-16.82% Jun 1, 2011 - Dec 13, 2011
#8	-21.18% May 7, 2021 - Oct 22, 2021	-16.62% Apr 26, 2013 - Apr 14, 2015
#9	-20.60% May 21, 2013 - Jul 11, 2013	-14.89% Nov 4, 1999 - Sep 7, 2000
#10	-20.20% Jan 22, 2014 - Feb 26, 2014	-12.89% Apr 30, 2010 - Jul 27, 2010
#11	-17.82% Mar 15, 2021 - Apr 15, 2021	-11.75% Jul 1, 2005 - May 26, 2006
#12	-17.67% Aug 1, 2013 - Oct 1, 2013	-11.10% Dec 31, 2009 - Apr 1, 2010
#13	-16.07% Jul 25, 2017 - Sep 29, 2017	-10.62% Oct 4, 2017 - Dec 27, 2017
#14	-15.55% Apr 2, 2014 - Jun 5, 2014	-10.44% Oct 8, 2012 - Dec 18, 2012
#15	-14.94% Feb 18, 2011 - Mar 30, 2011	-9.90% Feb 16, 2005 - Jul 1, 2005

Correlation

Correlation between UMDD and CIF is 0.92 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.92

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

UMDD vs CIF dividend yield comparison.

Year	UMDD	CIF
2026	0.12%	4.48%
2025	1.00%	10.46%
2024	0.76%	10.23%
2023	0.19%	10.02%
2022	0.49%	11.21%
2021	0.06%	8.40%
2020	0.08%	9.01%
2019	0.64%	8.64%
2018	0.32%	11.72%
2017	0.00%	9.16%
2016	0.03%	9.91%
2015	0.06%	10.05%
2014	0.08%	8.27%
2013	0.00%	8.32%
2012	0.00%	8.76%
2011	0.00%	9.77%
2010	0.05%	10.37%
2009	0.00%	9.00%
2008	0.00%	20.62%
2007	0.00%	9.87%
2006	0.00%	8.61%
2005	0.00%	11.13%
2004	0.00%	8.62%
2003	0.00%	8.93%
2002	0.00%	12.19%
2001	0.00%	14.41%
2000	0.00%	5.93%