UHT vs MCS
Comparison between Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT, Company) and Marcus Corp (MCS, Company).
UHT is from the Real Estate sector, while MCS is from the Communication Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceMCS has outperformed UHT, delivering a return of -0.3% compared to -4.3%
UHT vs MCS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
UHT vs MCS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
UHT vs MCS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | UHT | MCS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.86% | +34.85% |
| 2025 | +15.59% | -25.49% |
| 2024 | -8.75% | +51.31% |
| 2023 | -4.23% | +3.09% |
| 2022 | -15.70% | -20.19% |
| 2021 | -0.90% | +39.86% |
| 2020 | -41.67% | -57.86% |
| 2019 | +99.26% | -18.26% |
| 2018 | -13.35% | +44.08% |
| 2017 | +18.78% | -11.93% |
| 2016 | +40.50% | +78.63% |
| 2015 | +7.36% | +5.33% |
| 2014 | +26.95% | +40.08% |
| 2013 | -18.36% | +5.14% |
| 2012 | +36.86% | +8.76% |
| 2011 | +12.48% | -4.57% |
| 2010 | +22.27% | +3.39% |
| 2009 | +7.59% | -19.67% |
| 2008 | +2.96% | +11.02% |
| 2007 | -3.43% | -39.27% |
| 2006 | +29.47% | +55.85% |
| 2005 | +4.15% | -3.39% |
| 2004 | +15.66% | +59.03% |
| 2003 | +23.74% | +14.54% |
| 2002 | +20.43% | +1.11% |
| 2001 | +33.92% | +19.81% |
| 2000 | +54.26% | +3.00% |
| 1999 | -9.77% | -4.82% |
UHT vs MCS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for UHT was -69.01%, occurring on Apr 17, 2024. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for MCS was -83.84%, occurring on Oct 14, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current UHT drawdown is -54.40%. The current MCS drawdown is -50.09%.
| Rank | UHT | MCS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -69.01% Feb 13, 2020 - Apr 17, 2024 | -83.84% Jan 29, 2019 - Oct 14, 2020 |
| #2 | -40.55% Sep 18, 2008 - Mar 10, 2010 | -72.89% Dec 27, 2006 - Jul 18, 2014 |
| #3 | -33.64% Apr 12, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 | -40.88% Nov 12, 1999 - Oct 31, 2000 |
| #4 | -33.12% Jul 19, 2017 - Apr 5, 2019 | -31.91% May 1, 2002 - Jan 13, 2004 |
| #5 | -28.18% Feb 7, 2007 - Sep 16, 2008 | -30.39% Jun 21, 2001 - Jan 31, 2002 |
| #6 | -27.00% Apr 1, 2004 - Nov 15, 2004 | -29.41% Apr 27, 2017 - Jul 26, 2018 |
| #7 | -23.77% Jul 25, 2011 - Jun 28, 2012 | -28.87% Dec 20, 2004 - Mar 24, 2006 |
| #8 | -22.55% Jul 11, 2005 - Oct 16, 2006 | -25.21% Jul 18, 2014 - Feb 17, 2015 |
| #9 | -22.40% Mar 24, 2015 - Mar 17, 2016 | -21.00% Nov 10, 2000 - Feb 7, 2001 |
| #10 | -17.80% Dec 13, 2004 - May 3, 2005 | -17.84% Mar 12, 2004 - Jul 15, 2004 |
| #11 | -16.25% May 15, 2001 - Sep 7, 2001 | -17.73% Apr 8, 2015 - Jul 5, 2016 |
| #12 | -15.30% Mar 24, 2010 - Oct 5, 2010 | -15.41% Oct 16, 2018 - Jan 29, 2019 |
| #13 | -15.09% Jul 19, 2002 - Mar 21, 2003 | -12.52% Mar 31, 2006 - Jun 29, 2006 |
| #14 | -13.88% Sep 28, 2016 - Dec 8, 2016 | -12.01% Feb 7, 2001 - May 4, 2001 |
| #15 | -12.40% Jan 10, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000 | -11.88% Jul 5, 2006 - Sep 12, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between UHT and MCS is 0.78 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
UHT vs MCS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | UHT | MCS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.81% | 0.79% |
| 2025 | 7.55% | 1.93% |
| 2024 | 7.85% | 1.30% |
| 2023 | 6.66% | 1.65% |
| 2022 | 5.95% | 0.69% |
| 2021 | 4.71% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 4.29% | 1.26% |
| 2019 | 2.32% | 2.01% |
| 2018 | 4.37% | 1.52% |
| 2017 | 3.51% | 1.83% |
| 2016 | 3.96% | 1.43% |
| 2015 | 5.12% | 2.16% |
| 2014 | 5.24% | 2.00% |
| 2013 | 6.23% | 1.26% |
| 2012 | 4.86% | 12.11% |
| 2011 | 6.22% | 2.70% |
| 2010 | 6.61% | 2.56% |
| 2009 | 7.43% | 2.65% |
| 2008 | 7.11% | 2.09% |
| 2007 | 6.49% | 2.20% |
| 2006 | 5.80% | 28.56% |
| 2005 | 6.94% | 0.94% |
| 2004 | 7.78% | 0.88% |
| 2003 | 8.14% | 1.34% |
| 2002 | 9.14% | 1.55% |
| 2001 | 9.98% | 1.55% |
| 2000 | 11.59% | 1.73% |
| 1999 | 3.15% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks