UCTT vs KBR

Comparison between Ultra Clean Hldgs Inc (UCTT, Company) and KBR Inc (KBR, Company).

UCTT is from the Technology sector, while KBR is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceUCTT has outperformed KBR, delivering a return of +14.9% compared to -1.5%

UCTT vs KBR - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	UCTT(COMPANY)	KBR(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$4.57B	$4.56B
Max Drawdown	95.20%	77.60%
Sharpe Ratio	2.15	-0.84
5Y Beta	2.51	0.80
Industry	Semiconductor Equipment & Materials	Engineering & Construction
P/E Ratio	-23.81	11.41
Forward P/E	38.31	8.75
PEG Ratio	1.17	2.46
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.91%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	9.46%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	37.72%
Debt to Equity	95.86%	163.07%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-0.95%	5.17%
P/S Ratio	2.25	0.60
P/B Ratio	7.01	2.88

Market Cap

Winner

UCTT

$4.57B

KBR

$4.56B

Max Drawdown

UCTT

95.20%

Winner

KBR

77.60%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

UCTT

2.15

KBR

-0.84

5Y Beta

UCTT

2.51

Winner

KBR

0.80

Industry

UCTT

Semiconductor Equipment & Materials

KBR

Engineering & Construction

P/E Ratio

Winner

UCTT

-23.81

KBR

11.41

Forward P/E

UCTT

38.31

Winner

KBR

8.75

PEG Ratio

Winner

UCTT

1.17

KBR

2.46

Dividend Yield

UCTT

N/A

KBR

1.91%

5Y Dividends CAGR

UCTT

N/A

KBR

9.46%

5Y EPS CAGR

UCTT

N/A

KBR

37.72%

Debt to Equity

Winner

UCTT

95.86%

KBR

163.07%

Free Cash Flow Yield

UCTT

-0.95%

Winner

KBR

5.17%

P/S Ratio

UCTT

2.25

Winner

KBR

0.60

P/B Ratio

UCTT

7.01

Winner

KBR

2.88

UCTT vs KBR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	UCTT	KBR
1 month	-14.61%	+7.12%
3 months	+35.59%	-5.86%
6 months	+122.78%	-21.68%
1 year	+321.95%	-23.97%
5 years(CAGR)	+14.92%	-1.51%
10 years(CAGR)	+33.12%	+10.34%
Max(CAGR)	+12.56%	+3.85%

UCTT

-14.61%

Winner

KBR

+7.12%

Winner

UCTT

+35.59%

KBR

-5.86%

Winner

UCTT

+122.78%

KBR

-21.68%

Winner

UCTT

+321.95%

KBR

-23.97%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

UCTT

+14.92%

KBR

-1.51%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

UCTT

+33.12%

KBR

+10.34%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

UCTT

+12.56%

KBR

+3.85%

UCTT vs KBR - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	UCTT	KBR
2026	+284.88%	-14.31%
2025	-30.87%	-29.60%
2024	+8.84%	+4.65%
2023	+3.14%	+7.02%
2022	-43.30%	+10.73%
2021	+69.60%	+61.84%
2020	+34.79%	+2.39%
2019	+170.39%	+96.75%
2018	-64.25%	-22.43%
2017	+135.85%	+17.05%
2016	+84.76%	+0.55%
2015	-45.65%	+1.64%
2014	-4.62%	-44.35%
2013	+96.09%	+5.10%
2012	-15.20%	+6.89%
2011	-34.23%	-7.84%
2010	+26.84%	+58.05%
2009	+249.50%	+21.31%
2008	-82.48%	-60.40%
2007	-7.92%	+55.51%
2006	+71.05%	+26.07%
2005	+16.21%	N/A
2004	-19.20%	N/A

UCTT vs KBR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for UCTT was -95.20%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 2522 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for KBR was -77.46%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 3386 trading sessions.

The current UCTT drawdown is -26.26%. The current KBR drawdown is -51.02%.

Rank	UCTT	KBR
#1	-95.20% Apr 23, 2007 - Apr 27, 2017	-77.46% Oct 12, 2007 - Mar 26, 2021
#2	-79.34% Oct 18, 2017 - Dec 4, 2020	-57.39% Nov 11, 2024 - May 15, 2026
#3	-72.56% Apr 5, 2021 - Feb 24, 2026	-25.95% Dec 27, 2006 - May 21, 2007
#4	-49.88% Apr 13, 2004 - Jan 12, 2006	-23.89% Jul 3, 2023 - Apr 25, 2024
#5	-36.33% Jun 30, 2026 - Jul 7, 2026	-23.60% Apr 14, 2022 - Apr 11, 2023
#6	-29.74% Feb 24, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026	-18.00% Jul 12, 2007 - Sep 12, 2007
#7	-28.21% Jun 8, 2017 - Sep 14, 2017	-12.28% Jan 4, 2022 - Feb 28, 2022
#8	-27.55% Feb 9, 2006 - Aug 28, 2006	-12.27% Aug 30, 2024 - Oct 14, 2024
#9	-17.35% Dec 8, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021	-11.80% May 14, 2021 - Oct 15, 2021
#10	-17.24% Feb 16, 2021 - Mar 15, 2021	-11.57% Nov 24, 2021 - Dec 27, 2021
#11	-16.05% Nov 22, 2006 - Jan 8, 2007	-9.37% Jun 19, 2007 - Jul 9, 2007
#12	-15.44% Jan 12, 2007 - Feb 23, 2007	-8.52% Jun 4, 2007 - Jun 19, 2007
#13	-13.66% Jan 21, 2021 - Feb 4, 2021	-8.16% Jul 23, 2024 - Aug 29, 2024
#14	-13.25% Apr 24, 2026 - May 5, 2026	-8.12% May 6, 2024 - Jul 22, 2024
#15	-12.40% Jun 4, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026	-7.61% May 22, 2007 - Jun 4, 2007