TW vs SQM
Comparison between Tradeweb Markets Inc Cls A (TW, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).
TW is from the Financial Services sector, while SQM is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed TW, delivering a return of +13.7% compared to +2.6%
TW vs SQM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TW vs SQM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TW vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TW | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -8.32% | +7.45% |
| 2025 | -17.80% | +91.19% |
| 2024 | +47.17% | -38.56% |
| 2023 | +39.73% | -15.40% |
| 2022 | -32.39% | +70.49% |
| 2021 | +61.51% | +2.60% |
| 2020 | +34.39% | +87.42% |
| 2019 | +30.14% | -27.79% |
| 2018 | N/A | -35.04% |
| 2017 | N/A | +113.53% |
| 2016 | N/A | +61.04% |
| 2015 | N/A | -20.43% |
| 2014 | N/A | -1.99% |
| 2013 | N/A | -54.46% |
| 2012 | N/A | +7.62% |
| 2011 | N/A | -7.72% |
| 2010 | N/A | +53.00% |
| 2009 | N/A | +51.16% |
| 2008 | N/A | +46.55% |
| 2007 | N/A | +33.91% |
| 2006 | N/A | +23.39% |
| 2005 | N/A | +82.30% |
| 2004 | N/A | +52.01% |
| 2003 | N/A | +94.94% |
| 2002 | N/A | -8.87% |
| 2001 | N/A | +19.25% |
| 2000 | N/A | -10.37% |
| 1999 | N/A | +9.77% |
TW vs SQM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TW was -48.64%, occurring on Oct 11, 2022. Recovery took 532 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The current TW drawdown is -34.47%. The current SQM drawdown is -24.54%.
| Rank | TW | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -48.64% Dec 28, 2021 - Feb 9, 2024 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 |
| #2 | -38.26% Apr 3, 2025 - Jun 25, 2026 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 |
| #3 | -30.13% Mar 3, 2020 - Apr 16, 2020 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 |
| #4 | -26.88% Jul 23, 2019 - Feb 19, 2020 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 |
| #5 | -24.03% Jun 2, 2020 - Dec 17, 2020 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 |
| #6 | -11.45% Dec 18, 2020 - Feb 18, 2021 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 |
| #7 | -10.37% May 9, 2024 - Aug 8, 2024 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 |
| #8 | -9.40% Nov 26, 2024 - Mar 3, 2025 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 |
| #9 | -9.15% Aug 27, 2021 - Oct 29, 2021 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 |
| #10 | -8.87% May 31, 2019 - Jul 3, 2019 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #11 | -7.62% Apr 27, 2020 - May 8, 2020 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 |
| #12 | -7.47% Apr 15, 2019 - May 10, 2019 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 |
| #13 | -6.96% Mar 26, 2024 - May 6, 2024 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #14 | -6.75% Feb 21, 2020 - Mar 3, 2020 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 |
| #15 | -6.05% Oct 14, 2024 - Nov 22, 2024 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 |
Correlation
Correlation between TW and SQM is 0.18 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
TW vs SQM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TW | SQM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.29% | 1.39% |
| 2025 | 0.45% | 0.18% |
| 2024 | 0.31% | 0.59% |
| 2023 | 0.40% | 8.34% |
| 2022 | 0.49% | 9.66% |
| 2021 | 0.32% | 3.92% |
| 2020 | 0.51% | 1.64% |
| 2019 | 0.52% | 4.55% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 5.37% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 2.73% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 4.77% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.00% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 4.71% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 3.21% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 1.69% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.40% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 2.70% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 3.71% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.76% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.49% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.21% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.88% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.16% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 42.10% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks