TUSK vs MED

Comparison between Mammoth Energy Services Inc (TUSK, Company) and Medifast Inc (MED, Company).

TUSK is from the Industrials sector, while MED is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceTUSK has outperformed MED, delivering a return of -2.3% compared to -44.6%

TUSK vs MED - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	TUSK(COMPANY)	MED(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$137M	$137M
Max Drawdown	98.58%	97.16%
Sharpe Ratio	0.50	0.03
5Y Beta	0.84	0.64
Industry	Conglomerates	Personal Services
P/E Ratio	13.34	-5.29
Forward P/E	17.54	12.48
PEG Ratio	0.00	0.97
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	36.14%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-72.36%	2.92%
P/S Ratio	2.51	0.43
P/B Ratio	0.48	0.74

Market Cap

TUSK

$137M

Winner

MED

$137M

Max Drawdown

TUSK

98.58%

Winner

MED

97.16%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

TUSK

0.50

MED

0.03

5Y Beta

TUSK

0.84

Winner

MED

0.64

Industry

TUSK

Conglomerates

MED

Personal Services

P/E Ratio

TUSK

13.34

Winner

MED

-5.29

Forward P/E

TUSK

17.54

Winner

MED

12.48

PEG Ratio

Winner

TUSK

0.00

MED

0.97

5Y Dividends CAGR

TUSK

N/A

MED

36.14%

Debt to Equity

TUSK

0.00%

MED

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

TUSK

-72.36%

Winner

MED

2.92%

P/S Ratio

TUSK

2.51

Winner

MED

0.43

P/B Ratio

Winner

TUSK

0.48

MED

0.74

TUSK vs MED - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	TUSK	MED
1 month	-5.16%	+9.78%
3 months	+17.60%	-4.49%
6 months	+26.18%	+6.69%
1 year	+17.13%	-6.48%
5 years(CAGR)	-2.28%	-44.57%
10 years(CAGR)	-14.04%	-7.87%
Max(CAGR)	-14.04%	+18.01%

TUSK

-5.16%

Winner

MED

+9.78%

Winner

TUSK

+17.60%

MED

-4.49%

Winner

TUSK

+26.18%

MED

+6.69%

Winner

TUSK

+17.13%

MED

-6.48%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

TUSK

-2.28%

MED

-44.57%

10Y(CAGR)

TUSK

-14.04%

Winner

MED

-7.87%

Max(CAGR)

TUSK

-14.04%

Winner

MED

+18.01%

TUSK vs MED - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	TUSK	MED
2026	+49.24%	+16.54%
2025	-37.92%	-38.23%
2024	-32.13%	-74.91%
2023	-33.73%	-38.30%
2022	+348.19%	-44.02%
2021	-58.45%	+11.51%
2020	+103.20%	+82.55%
2019	-88.38%	-10.87%
2018	-11.08%	+75.31%
2017	+27.63%	+70.80%
2016	+14.63%	+50.07%
2015	N/A	-5.01%
2014	N/A	+28.64%
2013	N/A	-0.61%
2012	N/A	+76.88%
2011	N/A	-54.01%
2010	N/A	-13.09%
2009	N/A	+416.55%
2008	N/A	+11.52%
2007	N/A	-60.28%
2006	N/A	+132.78%
2005	N/A	+47.19%
2004	N/A	-74.84%
2003	N/A	+166.04%
2002	N/A	+2318.18%
2001	N/A	+57.14%
2000	N/A	-58.82%
1999	N/A	+0.00%

TUSK vs MED Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TUSK was -98.55%, occurring on Apr 7, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for MED was -96.79%, occurring on Jul 23, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current TUSK drawdown is -92.65%. The current MED drawdown is -95.89%.

Rank	TUSK	MED
#1	-98.55% Jun 22, 2018 - Apr 7, 2020	-96.79% May 28, 2021 - Jul 23, 2026
#2	-50.78% Mar 1, 2017 - Jan 8, 2018	-85.56% Nov 6, 2003 - Jun 2, 2006
#3	-19.17% Jan 23, 2018 - Feb 26, 2018	-83.16% Jun 21, 2006 - Sep 16, 2009
#4	-15.36% Dec 6, 2016 - Jan 13, 2017	-81.33% Jan 14, 2000 - Feb 8, 2002
#5	-13.33% Oct 24, 2016 - Nov 15, 2016	-80.80% Dec 7, 1999 - Jan 13, 2000
#6	-13.18% May 21, 2018 - May 29, 2018	-78.91% Sep 12, 2018 - Jan 25, 2021
#7	-12.82% Mar 12, 2018 - Apr 4, 2018	-64.63% May 13, 2010 - Aug 15, 2016
#8	-11.74% Apr 18, 2018 - May 17, 2018	-57.39% Nov 8, 1999 - Dec 7, 1999
#9	-8.47% Jun 6, 2018 - Jun 21, 2018	-52.90% Dec 28, 2009 - May 12, 2010
#10	-4.92% Jan 20, 2017 - Feb 3, 2017	-37.87% Jan 8, 2003 - Apr 21, 2003
#11	-4.52% Apr 4, 2018 - Apr 18, 2018	-35.00% Mar 8, 2002 - Aug 5, 2002
#12	-4.19% Feb 3, 2017 - Feb 14, 2017	-32.60% Jul 14, 2003 - Nov 6, 2003
#13	-4.02% May 29, 2018 - Jun 6, 2018	-27.65% Aug 12, 2002 - Sep 16, 2002
#14	-3.84% Jan 12, 2018 - Jan 19, 2018	-27.16% Jun 5, 2003 - Jul 11, 2003
#15	-2.93% Jan 9, 2018 - Jan 11, 2018	-24.94% Jun 2, 2006 - Jun 21, 2006