TURF vs GBF
Comparison between T. ROWE PRICE NATURAL RESOURCES ETF (TURF, ETF) and ISHARES GOVERNMENT/CREDIT BOND ETF (GBF, ETF).
TURF vs GBF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
Net Assets
Winner
TURF
$120M
GBF
$119M
Expense Ratio
TURF
0.44%
Winner
GBF
0.20%
Max Drawdown
Winner
TURF
9.26%
GBF
23.43%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
TURF
1.59
GBF
0.13
5Y Beta
TURF
0.60
Winner
GBF
0.03
P/E Ratio
TURF
29.97
GBF
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
TURF
N/A
GBF
18.25%
Debt to Equity
TURF
22.43%
GBF
N/A
P/S Ratio
TURF
1.16
GBF
N/A
P/B Ratio
TURF
1.99
GBF
N/A
TURF vs GBF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
1M
TURF
-6.21%
Winner
GBF
+0.39%
3M
TURF
-5.18%
Winner
GBF
+0.33%
6M
Winner
TURF
+15.64%
GBF
+0.62%
1Y
Winner
TURF
+33.91%
GBF
+3.84%
5Y(CAGR)
TURF
N/A
GBF
-0.30%
10Y(CAGR)
TURF
N/A
GBF
+1.45%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
TURF
+33.94%
GBF
+3.03%
TURF vs GBF - Annual Returns (2007 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TURF | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +12.77% | +0.34% |
| 2025 | +17.04% | +6.30% |
| 2024 | N/A | +1.42% |
| 2023 | N/A | +5.13% |
| 2022 | N/A | -13.13% |
| 2021 | N/A | -2.07% |
| 2020 | N/A | +8.44% |
| 2019 | N/A | +9.34% |
| 2018 | N/A | -0.15% |
| 2017 | N/A | +3.83% |
| 2016 | N/A | +2.25% |
| 2015 | N/A | -0.28% |
| 2014 | N/A | +6.05% |
| 2013 | N/A | -2.09% |
| 2012 | N/A | +4.13% |
| 2011 | N/A | +9.44% |
| 2010 | N/A | +5.44% |
| 2009 | N/A | +3.45% |
| 2008 | N/A | +6.81% |
| 2007 | N/A | +6.69% |
TURF vs GBF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TURF was -9.26%, occurring on Jun 10, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for GBF was -19.67%, occurring on Oct 24, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current TURF drawdown is -6.73%. The current GBF drawdown is -4.65%.
| Rank | TURF | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -9.26% Mar 2, 2026 - Jun 10, 2026 | -19.67% Aug 4, 2020 - Oct 24, 2022 |
| #2 | -4.92% Jan 29, 2026 - Feb 11, 2026 | -8.75% Sep 9, 2008 - Dec 2, 2008 |
| #3 | -4.40% Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025 | -7.97% Mar 9, 2020 - Jun 26, 2020 |
| #4 | -4.29% Oct 6, 2025 - Nov 11, 2025 | -6.12% May 2, 2013 - Jul 23, 2014 |
| #5 | -3.88% Nov 12, 2025 - Nov 28, 2025 | -5.85% Dec 29, 2008 - Jul 31, 2009 |
| #6 | -3.32% Jun 16, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025 | -5.20% Jul 8, 2016 - Sep 5, 2017 |
| #7 | -3.06% Feb 11, 2026 - Feb 24, 2026 | -4.35% Oct 6, 2010 - Jun 1, 2011 |
| #8 | -2.40% Dec 11, 2025 - Dec 22, 2025 | -3.90% Sep 7, 2017 - Feb 7, 2019 |
| #9 | -2.00% Jul 2, 2025 - Jul 22, 2025 | -3.73% Jan 30, 2015 - Feb 11, 2016 |
| #10 | -1.38% Dec 4, 2025 - Dec 11, 2025 | -2.81% Apr 9, 2008 - Sep 4, 2008 |
| #11 | -1.22% Jan 6, 2026 - Jan 9, 2026 | -2.75% May 7, 2007 - Aug 16, 2007 |
| #12 | -0.92% Dec 1, 2025 - Dec 3, 2025 | -2.58% Sep 4, 2019 - Jan 23, 2020 |
| #13 | -0.88% Dec 26, 2025 - Jan 2, 2026 | -2.00% Nov 12, 2012 - Apr 15, 2013 |
| #14 | -0.83% Sep 15, 2025 - Sep 23, 2025 | -1.98% Jul 24, 2012 - Nov 7, 2012 |
| #15 | -0.81% Aug 29, 2025 - Sep 10, 2025 | -1.86% Nov 30, 2009 - Mar 2, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between TURF and GBF is 0.78 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
0.78
-101
Dividend Comparison (2007 - 2026)
TURF vs GBF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TURF | GBF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.57% |
| 2025 | 1.49% | 3.81% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 3.94% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 3.03% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 2.13% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.22% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 1.64% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.64% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 2.59% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 2.31% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 2.09% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.04% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 2.08% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 2.53% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 3.03% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 3.19% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 3.56% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 4.17% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 4.67% |
Select Stocks to Compare
Popular: TURF vs SPYGBF vs SPY
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks