StockComparison Logo
vs

TU vs LAMR

Comparison between Telus Corp (TU, Company) and Lamar Advertising Co - Class A (LAMR, Company).

TU is from the Communication Services sector, while LAMR is from the Real Estate sector.

5-Year PerformanceLAMR has outperformed TU, delivering a return of +12.9% compared to -8.6%

TU vs LAMR - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
TU
$16B
LAMR
$16B
Max Drawdown
Winner
TU
89.79%
LAMR
92.26%
Sharpe Ratio
TU
-2.18
Winner
LAMR
1.14
5Y Beta
Winner
TU
0.02
LAMR
0.78
Industry
TU
Telecom Services
LAMR
Reit - Specialty
P/E Ratio
Winner
TU
24.08
LAMR
30.33
Forward P/E
Winner
TU
15.95
LAMR
29.50
PEG Ratio
Winner
TU
0.77
LAMR
4.22
Dividend Yield
Winner
TU
16.00%
LAMR
3.85%
5Y Dividends CAGR
TU
9.42%
Winner
LAMR
29.20%
5Y EPS CAGR
TU
-9.26%
Winner
LAMR
7.55%
Debt to Equity
Winner
TU
199.56%
LAMR
356.02%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
TU
9.58%
LAMR
4.31%
P/S Ratio
Winner
TU
0.80
LAMR
7.19
P/B Ratio
Winner
TU
1.46
LAMR
16.75

TU vs LAMR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
TU
-12.22%
Winner
LAMR
+4.04%
3M
TU
-9.65%
Winner
LAMR
+17.53%
6M
TU
-18.14%
Winner
LAMR
+22.63%
1Y
TU
-30.98%
Winner
LAMR
+30.04%
5Y(CAGR)
TU
-8.55%
Winner
LAMR
+12.92%
10Y(CAGR)
TU
+1.19%
Winner
LAMR
+13.85%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
TU
+8.37%
LAMR
+6.42%

TU vs LAMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearTULAMR
2026-16.58%+27.86%
2025+4.57%+10.31%
2024-18.87%+19.69%
2023-2.16%+21.94%
2022-14.39%-18.41%
2021+23.83%+56.85%
2020+7.03%-2.55%
2019+21.95%+39.36%
2018-8.14%-0.05%
2017+24.89%+14.38%
2016+23.85%+18.04%
2015-18.53%+17.05%
2014+9.58%+9.01%
2013+9.43%+30.69%
2012+26.46%+37.02%
2011+28.10%-32.40%
2010+44.95%+23.23%
2009+16.56%+121.12%
2008-38.58%-73.62%
2007+13.05%-22.79%
2006+11.84%+41.51%
2005+45.43%+8.26%
2004+54.21%+13.90%
2003+85.03%+4.07%
2002-21.96%-20.62%
2001-38.82%+15.49%
2000+15.51%-36.34%
1999+21.85%+8.38%

TU vs LAMR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TU was -88.30%, occurring on Jul 26, 2002. Recovery took 1085 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LAMR was -91.85%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2262 trading sessions.

The current TU drawdown is -49.20%. The current LAMR drawdown is -4.36%.

RankTULAMR
#1-88.30%
Aug 22, 2000 - Dec 17, 2004
-91.85%
Jan 11, 2007 - Jan 6, 2016
#2-59.59%
Jun 4, 2007 - Apr 21, 2011
-65.88%
Feb 20, 2020 - Mar 5, 2021
#3-50.32%
Apr 8, 2022 - Jul 2, 2026
-60.77%
Feb 4, 2000 - Jan 10, 2007
#4-33.66%
Feb 12, 2020 - Dec 9, 2020
-30.05%
Dec 30, 2021 - Feb 22, 2024
#5-31.02%
Nov 18, 2014 - May 22, 2017
-23.85%
Oct 15, 2024 - Nov 21, 2025
#6-22.54%
May 10, 2013 - Mar 27, 2014
-18.81%
Dec 14, 2017 - Aug 16, 2018
#7-22.08%
Oct 31, 2006 - Apr 20, 2007
-18.30%
Feb 21, 2017 - Nov 7, 2017
#8-19.49%
Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 18, 2000
-18.10%
Nov 7, 2018 - Mar 4, 2019
#9-16.19%
Jul 31, 2000 - Aug 22, 2000
-17.39%
Jan 6, 2016 - Mar 17, 2016
#10-16.09%
Jul 15, 2011 - Jan 3, 2012
-13.11%
Jul 22, 2016 - Dec 19, 2016
#11-11.80%
Jun 16, 2014 - Nov 17, 2014
-12.55%
Nov 9, 2021 - Dec 29, 2021
#12-11.31%
Sep 13, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019
-11.63%
Jun 20, 2019 - Nov 15, 2019
#13-11.31%
Jan 3, 2006 - Mar 16, 2006
-11.43%
Dec 9, 1999 - Jan 25, 2000
#14-10.87%
May 2, 2006 - Aug 1, 2006
-11.34%
Jan 26, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
#15-10.74%
Sep 23, 2005 - Jan 3, 2006
-10.05%
Mar 2, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between TU and LAMR is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.80
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

TU vs LAMR dividend yield comparison.

YearTULAMR
20265.89%2.06%
20259.01%5.10%
20248.35%4.64%
20236.02%4.70%
20225.39%5.30%
20214.31%3.30%
20204.51%3.00%
20194.37%4.30%
20185.19%5.28%
20175.20%4.47%
20165.78%4.49%
20156.08%4.58%
20144.22%4.66%
20133.95%0.00%
20123.75%0.00%
20114.12%0.00%
20104.59%0.00%
20096.10%0.00%
20086.42%0.00%
20073.93%6.76%
20063.23%0.00%
20052.48%0.00%
20042.63%0.00%
20033.76%0.00%
20026.70%0.00%
20019.90%0.00%
20004.54%0.00%
19991.01%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare