StockComparison Logo
vs

TU vs CLH

Comparison between Telus Corp (TU, Company) and Clean Harbors Inc (CLH, Company).

TU is from the Communication Services sector, while CLH is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCLH has outperformed TU, delivering a return of +25.8% compared to -10.1%

TU vs CLH - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
TU
$17B
CLH
$17B
Max Drawdown
TU
89.79%
Winner
CLH
80.87%
Sharpe Ratio
TU
-1.88
Winner
CLH
1.01
5Y Beta
Winner
TU
-0.02
CLH
0.70
Industry
TU
Telecom Services
CLH
Waste Management
P/E Ratio
Winner
TU
25.65
CLH
43.98
Forward P/E
Winner
TU
14.90
CLH
34.36
PEG Ratio
Winner
TU
0.77
CLH
19.77
Dividend Yield
TU
17.50%
CLH
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
TU
9.42%
Winner
CLH
125.49%
5Y EPS CAGR
TU
-9.26%
Winner
CLH
23.04%
Debt to Equity
TU
199.56%
Winner
CLH
99.95%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
TU
8.99%
CLH
2.71%
P/S Ratio
Winner
TU
0.85
CLH
2.68
P/B Ratio
Winner
TU
1.51
CLH
5.78

TU vs CLH - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
TU
-6.48%
Winner
CLH
+6.69%
3M
TU
-22.35%
Winner
CLH
+0.08%
6M
TU
-29.91%
Winner
CLH
+19.06%
1Y
TU
-33.75%
Winner
CLH
+31.40%
5Y(CAGR)
TU
-10.06%
Winner
CLH
+25.77%
10Y(CAGR)
TU
+0.31%
Winner
CLH
+19.92%
Max(CAGR)
TU
+7.99%
Winner
CLH
+33.39%

TU vs CLH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearTUCLH
2026-23.70%+27.62%
2025+4.57%+2.17%
2024-18.87%+34.87%
2023-2.16%+53.43%
2022-14.39%+17.17%
2021+23.83%+33.54%
2020+7.03%-10.49%
2019+21.95%+72.54%
2018-8.14%-7.51%
2017+24.89%-2.78%
2016+23.85%+32.06%
2015-18.53%-14.07%
2014+9.58%-18.57%
2013+9.43%+10.14%
2012+26.46%-12.21%
2011+28.10%+202.04%
2010+44.95%+38.59%
2009+16.56%-6.38%
2008-38.58%+26.05%
2007+13.05%+9.89%
2006+11.84%+67.31%
2005+45.43%+115.12%
2004+54.21%+107.82%
2003+85.03%-33.48%
2002-21.96%+519.75%
2001-38.82%+129.79%
2000+15.51%+46.10%
1999+21.85%-16.67%

TU vs CLH Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TU was -88.30%, occurring on Jul 26, 2002. Recovery took 1085 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CLH was -77.69%, occurring on Oct 23, 2003. Recovery took 435 trading sessions.

The current TU drawdown is -53.54%. The current CLH drawdown is -4.80%.

RankTUCLH
#1-88.30%
Aug 22, 2000 - Dec 17, 2004
-77.69%
Dec 18, 2002 - Sep 13, 2004
#2-59.59%
Jun 4, 2007 - Apr 21, 2011
-64.51%
Feb 20, 2020 - Feb 24, 2021
#3-53.54%
Apr 8, 2022 - Aug 4, 2026
-56.67%
Mar 17, 2000 - Oct 22, 2001
#4-33.66%
Feb 12, 2020 - Dec 9, 2020
-54.43%
May 20, 2002 - Nov 21, 2002
#5-31.02%
Nov 18, 2014 - May 22, 2017
-50.39%
Aug 28, 2008 - Dec 20, 2010
#6-22.54%
May 10, 2013 - Mar 27, 2014
-44.03%
Feb 23, 2012 - Sep 7, 2018
#7-22.08%
Oct 31, 2006 - Apr 20, 2007
-36.30%
Oct 22, 2001 - Jan 29, 2002
#8-19.49%
Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 18, 2000
-34.99%
Sep 7, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019
#9-16.19%
Jul 31, 2000 - Aug 22, 2000
-30.86%
Oct 29, 2024 - Jan 15, 2026
#10-16.09%
Jul 15, 2011 - Jan 3, 2012
-30.19%
Nov 7, 2005 - May 4, 2006
#11-11.80%
Jun 16, 2014 - Nov 17, 2014
-29.27%
Nov 2, 2021 - Aug 12, 2022
#12-11.31%
Sep 13, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019
-28.02%
Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 11, 2000
#13-11.31%
Jan 3, 2006 - Mar 16, 2006
-21.97%
Jan 19, 2000 - Mar 3, 2000
#14-10.87%
May 2, 2006 - Aug 1, 2006
-21.04%
Apr 10, 2002 - May 13, 2002
#15-10.74%
Sep 23, 2005 - Jan 3, 2006
-20.69%
Jan 31, 2002 - Feb 25, 2002

Correlation

Correlation between TU and CLH is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.74
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

TU vs CLH dividend yield comparison.

YearTUCLH
20266.44%0.00%
20259.01%0.00%
20248.35%0.00%
20236.02%0.00%
20225.39%0.00%
20214.31%0.00%
20204.51%0.00%
20194.37%0.00%
20185.19%0.00%
20175.20%0.00%
20165.78%0.00%
20156.08%0.00%
20144.22%0.00%
20133.95%0.00%
20123.75%0.00%
20114.12%84.34%
20104.59%0.00%
20096.10%0.00%
20086.42%0.00%
20073.93%1.79%
20063.23%1.90%
20052.48%6.40%
20042.63%12.22%
20033.76%20.70%
20026.70%11.85%
20019.90%12.62%
20004.54%0.00%
19991.01%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare