TRS vs LKFN
Comparison between Trimas Corporation (TRS, Company) and Lakeland Financial Corp (LKFN, Company).
TRS is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while LKFN is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceTRS has outperformed LKFN, delivering a return of +7.9% compared to +4.0%
TRS vs LKFN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TRS vs LKFN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TRS vs LKFN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TRS | LKFN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +14.11% | +11.24% |
| 2025 | +49.59% | -12.44% |
| 2024 | -3.73% | +9.01% |
| 2023 | -8.99% | -7.13% |
| 2022 | -24.34% | -5.68% |
| 2021 | +19.30% | +51.91% |
| 2020 | +1.67% | +12.29% |
| 2019 | +17.77% | +23.17% |
| 2018 | +1.07% | -15.08% |
| 2017 | +12.87% | +4.62% |
| 2016 | +29.19% | +60.34% |
| 2015 | -25.35% | +11.37% |
| 2014 | -19.69% | +15.53% |
| 2013 | +37.74% | +48.63% |
| 2012 | +51.97% | +2.38% |
| 2011 | -12.91% | +16.96% |
| 2010 | +184.56% | +26.13% |
| 2009 | +394.16% | -22.51% |
| 2008 | -86.30% | +22.29% |
| 2007 | -9.87% | -16.86% |
| 2006 | N/A | +26.70% |
| 2005 | N/A | +3.56% |
| 2004 | N/A | +11.98% |
| 2003 | N/A | +53.66% |
| 2002 | N/A | +34.99% |
| 2001 | N/A | +46.52% |
| 2000 | N/A | -14.01% |
| 1999 | N/A | -12.78% |
TRS vs LKFN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TRS was -93.99%, occurring on Mar 2, 2009. Recovery took 752 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for LKFN was -47.35%, occurring on May 16, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current TRS drawdown is -8.22%. The current LKFN drawdown is -16.96%.
| Rank | TRS | LKFN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -93.99% Oct 23, 2007 - Oct 18, 2010 | -47.35% Jan 14, 2022 - May 16, 2023 |
| #2 | -54.97% Oct 23, 2013 - Jan 12, 2021 | -43.62% Sep 18, 2008 - Jul 7, 2011 |
| #3 | -48.32% Jul 7, 2011 - Dec 10, 2012 | -38.86% Jan 25, 2000 - Aug 9, 2001 |
| #4 | -47.20% Nov 12, 2021 - Aug 21, 2025 | -34.70% Dec 20, 2019 - Aug 7, 2020 |
| #5 | -22.24% Sep 18, 2025 - May 5, 2026 | -27.94% Dec 27, 2006 - Sep 18, 2008 |
| #6 | -22.09% Dec 13, 2010 - Apr 20, 2011 | -25.68% Mar 10, 2021 - Oct 18, 2021 |
| #7 | -21.90% Feb 23, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021 | -24.74% Jan 26, 2004 - Nov 17, 2004 |
| #8 | -19.54% Apr 25, 2011 - Jun 30, 2011 | -24.21% Nov 29, 2017 - Dec 20, 2019 |
| #9 | -14.14% Mar 28, 2013 - May 20, 2013 | -21.03% Aug 10, 2020 - Oct 26, 2020 |
| #10 | -13.58% Jul 5, 2013 - Oct 21, 2013 | -20.93% Jul 9, 2002 - Jun 5, 2003 |
| #11 | -12.22% May 8, 2026 - Jun 18, 2026 | -17.92% Nov 1, 1999 - Jan 25, 2000 |
| #12 | -9.88% Jun 5, 2007 - Sep 4, 2007 | -17.45% Dec 4, 2015 - May 18, 2016 |
| #13 | -9.58% Feb 14, 2013 - Mar 22, 2013 | -16.58% Jul 21, 2011 - Oct 27, 2011 |
| #14 | -8.30% Jan 22, 2021 - Feb 12, 2021 | -16.47% Sep 24, 2012 - May 17, 2013 |
| #15 | -8.22% Jun 30, 2026 - Jul 6, 2026 | -12.92% Dec 30, 2014 - Jun 22, 2015 |
Correlation
Correlation between TRS and LKFN is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
TRS vs LKFN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TRS | LKFN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.19% | 1.69% |
| 2025 | 0.45% | 3.51% |
| 2024 | 0.65% | 2.79% |
| 2023 | 0.63% | 2.82% |
| 2022 | 0.58% | 2.19% |
| 2021 | 0.11% | 1.70% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 2.24% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 2.49% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 1.75% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 1.53% |
| 2015 | 32.28% | 2.03% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 1.89% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.46% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 3.23% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 2.40% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 2.89% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 3.59% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.54% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 2.61% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.92% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 2.23% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.07% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.09% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.82% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 3.29% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 4.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks