TRMB vs SF

Comparison between Trimble Inc (TRMB, Company) and Stifel Financial Corp (SF, Company).

TRMB is from the Technology sector, while SF is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceSF has outperformed TRMB, delivering a return of +15.5% compared to -8.3%

TRMB vs SF - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	TRMB(COMPANY)	SF(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$13B	$13B
Max Drawdown	87.23%	55.25%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.15	0.59
5Y Beta	1.28	1.31
Industry	Scientific & Technical Instruments	Capital Markets
P/E Ratio	-121.54	15.58
Forward P/E	16.31	13.93
PEG Ratio	1.63	0.27
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.54%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	35.75%
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	16.04%
Debt to Equity	28.55%	10.27%
Free Cash Flow Yield	5.88%	3.47%
P/S Ratio	3.56	N/A
P/B Ratio	2.42	N/A

Market Cap

Winner

TRMB

$13B

Max Drawdown

TRMB

87.23%

Winner

55.25%

Sharpe Ratio

TRMB

-1.15

Winner

0.59

5Y Beta

Winner

TRMB

1.28

1.31

Industry

TRMB

Scientific & Technical Instruments

Capital Markets

P/E Ratio

Winner

TRMB

-121.54

15.58

Forward P/E

TRMB

16.31

Winner

13.93

PEG Ratio

TRMB

1.63

Winner

0.27

Dividend Yield

TRMB

N/A

1.54%

5Y Dividends CAGR

TRMB

N/A

35.75%

5Y EPS CAGR

TRMB

N/A

16.04%

Debt to Equity

TRMB

28.55%

Winner

10.27%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

TRMB

5.88%

3.47%

P/S Ratio

TRMB

3.56

N/A

P/B Ratio

TRMB

2.42

N/A

TRMB vs SF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	TRMB	SF
1 month	+10.04%	+13.94%
3 months	+4.81%	+16.14%
6 months	-13.34%	+9.51%
1 year	-31.88%	+12.99%
5 years(CAGR)	-8.33%	+15.49%
10 years(CAGR)	+7.57%	+19.79%
Max(CAGR)	+11.99%	+16.81%

TRMB

+10.04%

Winner

+13.94%

TRMB

+4.81%

Winner

+16.14%

TRMB

-13.34%

Winner

+9.51%

TRMB

-31.88%

Winner

+12.99%

5Y(CAGR)

TRMB

-8.33%

Winner

+15.49%

10Y(CAGR)

TRMB

+7.57%

Winner

+19.79%

Max(CAGR)

TRMB

+11.99%

Winner

+16.81%

TRMB vs SF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	TRMB	SF
2026	-26.54%	+1.57%
2025	+12.39%	+20.03%
2024	+34.72%	+56.07%
2023	+5.14%	+19.01%
2022	-41.67%	-17.01%
2021	+31.53%	+45.12%
2020	+59.20%	+24.74%
2019	+28.40%	+48.01%
2018	-19.85%	-30.66%
2017	+34.26%	+19.75%
2016	+39.65%	+20.54%
2015	-20.29%	-16.30%
2014	-22.94%	+8.46%
2013	+12.81%	+44.21%
2012	+43.60%	-4.60%
2011	+6.79%	-23.70%
2010	+55.67%	+4.94%
2009	+13.00%	+29.63%
2008	-27.21%	+35.57%
2007	+17.28%	+34.90%
2006	+40.68%	+2.56%
2005	+9.77%	+85.90%
2004	+34.97%	+50.83%
2003	+184.49%	+77.28%
2002	-22.85%	+7.63%
2001	-29.52%	-4.65%
2000	-3.54%	+19.52%
1999	+30.06%	-6.80%

TRMB vs SF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TRMB was -87.23%, occurring on Oct 7, 2002. Recovery took 1256 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for SF was -55.25%, occurring on Feb 24, 2016. Recovery took 618 trading sessions.

The current TRMB drawdown is -39.89%. The current SF drawdown is -2.18%.

Rank	TRMB	SF
#1	-87.23% Jul 18, 2000 - Jul 19, 2005	-55.25% Jun 23, 2015 - Dec 4, 2017
#2	-71.92% Oct 23, 2007 - Jan 14, 2011	-51.89% Feb 20, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020
#3	-59.66% Mar 6, 2014 - Sep 19, 2017	-50.85% Mar 8, 2011 - Jan 16, 2014
#4	-57.35% Aug 30, 2021 - Nov 13, 2023	-42.10% Feb 1, 2018 - Feb 4, 2020
#5	-53.78% Feb 20, 2020 - Aug 6, 2020	-41.41% Sep 19, 2008 - May 4, 2009
#6	-39.04% Mar 7, 2000 - May 1, 2000	-40.06% Oct 11, 2007 - Jul 23, 2008
#7	-37.49% Apr 4, 2011 - Mar 13, 2012	-36.25% Feb 8, 2022 - Mar 28, 2024
#8	-35.88% Jul 20, 2005 - Mar 22, 2006	-34.67% Jan 30, 2025 - Oct 22, 2025
#9	-33.10% Jan 23, 2018 - Jun 28, 2019	-32.45% Oct 16, 2000 - Nov 3, 2003
#10	-27.42% Mar 27, 2012 - Nov 29, 2012	-31.50% Mar 30, 2006 - Jan 11, 2007
#11	-23.63% Jan 3, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000	-27.20% Dec 30, 2009 - Dec 14, 2010
#12	-21.81% Jan 25, 2013 - Nov 1, 2013	-25.97% Mar 9, 2004 - Nov 22, 2004
#13	-21.27% Jul 3, 2019 - Feb 19, 2020	-22.74% Jan 6, 2026 - Jun 29, 2026
#14	-18.88% May 5, 2006 - Aug 3, 2006	-21.42% Feb 21, 2007 - May 25, 2007
#15	-15.55% Dec 28, 1999 - Jan 3, 2000	-19.86% Dec 3, 2004 - Jun 23, 2005