TRMB vs LFUS

Comparison between Trimble Inc (TRMB, Company) and Littelfuse Inc (LFUS, Company).

Both TRMB and LFUS are from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceLFUS has outperformed TRMB, delivering a return of +14.7% compared to -9.0%

TRMB vs LFUS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	TRMB(COMPANY)	LFUS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$12B	$12B
Max Drawdown	87.23%	82.44%
Sharpe Ratio	-1.25	2.06
5Y Beta	1.31	1.54
Industry	Scientific & Technical Instruments	Electronic Components
P/E Ratio	25.93	46.97
Forward P/E	13.72	33.00
PEG Ratio	N/A	2.77
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.60%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	14.02%
5Y EPS CAGR	1.84%	6.84%
Debt to Equity	25.06%	25.12%
Free Cash Flow Yield	4.14%	3.35%

Market Cap

TRMB

$12B

Winner

LFUS

$12B

Max Drawdown

TRMB

87.23%

Winner

LFUS

82.44%

Sharpe Ratio

TRMB

-1.25

Winner

LFUS

2.06

5Y Beta

Winner

TRMB

1.31

LFUS

1.54

Industry

TRMB

Scientific & Technical Instruments

LFUS

Electronic Components

P/E Ratio

Winner

TRMB

25.93

LFUS

46.97

Forward P/E

Winner

TRMB

13.72

LFUS

33.00

PEG Ratio

TRMB

N/A

LFUS

2.77

Dividend Yield

TRMB

N/A

LFUS

0.60%

5Y Dividends CAGR

TRMB

N/A

LFUS

14.02%

5Y EPS CAGR

TRMB

1.84%

Winner

LFUS

6.84%

Debt to Equity

Winner

TRMB

25.06%

LFUS

25.12%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

TRMB

4.14%

LFUS

3.35%

TRMB vs LFUS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	TRMB	LFUS
1 month	-11.00%	+0.70%
3 months	-23.31%	+31.76%
6 months	-37.33%	+78.65%
1 year	-31.98%	+109.56%
5 years(CAGR)	-9.03%	+14.68%
10 years(CAGR)	+6.78%	+15.95%
Max(CAGR)	+11.48%	+12.76%

TRMB

-11.00%

Winner

LFUS

+0.70%

TRMB

-23.31%

Winner

LFUS

+31.76%

TRMB

-37.33%

Winner

LFUS

+78.65%

TRMB

-31.98%

Winner

LFUS

+109.56%

5Y(CAGR)

TRMB

-9.03%

Winner

LFUS

+14.68%

10Y(CAGR)

TRMB

+6.78%

Winner

LFUS

+15.95%

Max(CAGR)

TRMB

+11.48%

Winner

LFUS

+12.76%

TRMB vs LFUS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	TRMB	LFUS
2026	-35.99%	+77.28%
2025	+12.39%	+9.09%
2024	+34.72%	-9.02%
2023	+5.14%	+21.19%
2022	-41.67%	-29.67%
2021	+31.53%	+25.78%
2020	+59.20%	+32.98%
2019	+28.40%	+13.61%
2018	-19.85%	-12.83%
2017	+34.26%	+32.24%
2016	+39.65%	+48.51%
2015	-20.29%	+13.16%
2014	-22.94%	+7.22%
2013	+12.81%	+49.56%
2012	+43.60%	+38.70%
2011	+6.79%	-10.07%
2010	+55.67%	+40.62%
2009	+13.00%	+86.16%
2008	-27.21%	-51.02%
2007	+17.28%	+5.24%
2006	+40.68%	+14.10%
2005	+9.77%	-19.02%
2004	+34.97%	+19.07%
2003	+184.49%	+66.11%
2002	-22.85%	-33.80%
2001	-29.52%	+4.96%
2000	-3.54%	+16.86%
1999	+30.06%	+9.08%

TRMB vs LFUS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TRMB was -87.23%, occurring on Oct 7, 2002. Recovery took 1256 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for LFUS was -82.44%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2646 trading sessions.

The current TRMB drawdown is -47.62%. The current LFUS drawdown is -5.20%.

Rank	TRMB	LFUS
#1	-87.23% Jul 18, 2000 - Jul 19, 2005	-82.44% Jun 29, 2000 - Jan 6, 2011
#2	-71.92% Oct 23, 2007 - Jan 14, 2011	-54.17% Jun 20, 2018 - Nov 16, 2020
#3	-59.66% Mar 6, 2014 - Sep 19, 2017	-53.29% Nov 17, 2021 - Jan 29, 2026
#4	-57.35% Aug 30, 2021 - Nov 13, 2023	-40.12% May 2, 2011 - Apr 2, 2012
#5	-53.78% Feb 20, 2020 - Aug 6, 2020	-21.61% Apr 2, 2012 - Jan 23, 2013
#6	-39.04% Mar 7, 2000 - May 1, 2000	-19.75% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 10, 2026
#7	-37.49% Apr 4, 2011 - Mar 13, 2012	-18.54% Apr 16, 2014 - Nov 3, 2014
#8	-35.88% Jul 20, 2005 - Mar 22, 2006	-18.17% Mar 2, 2015 - Nov 2, 2015
#9	-33.10% Jan 23, 2018 - Jun 28, 2019	-17.23% Nov 9, 2015 - Feb 23, 2016
#10	-27.42% Mar 27, 2012 - Nov 29, 2012	-17.03% Mar 29, 2000 - May 30, 2000
#11	-23.63% Jan 3, 2000 - Mar 6, 2000	-16.40% Mar 16, 2018 - Jun 6, 2018
#12	-21.81% Jan 25, 2013 - Nov 1, 2013	-15.89% Jan 20, 2021 - Aug 27, 2021
#13	-21.27% Jul 3, 2019 - Feb 19, 2020	-15.46% Nov 12, 1999 - Dec 30, 1999
#14	-18.88% May 5, 2006 - Aug 3, 2006	-13.00% Mar 29, 2016 - Jul 27, 2016
#15	-15.55% Dec 28, 1999 - Jan 3, 2000	-12.91% Oct 24, 2017 - Nov 21, 2017