TRI vs PUK
Comparison between Thomson-Reuters Corp (TRI, Company) and Prudential plc (PUK, Company).
TRI is from the Industrials sector, while PUK is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceTRI has outperformed PUK, delivering a return of -2.6% compared to -4.8%
TRI vs PUK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TRI vs PUK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TRI vs PUK - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TRI | PUK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -36.88% | -14.18% |
| 2025 | -17.06% | +102.41% |
| 2024 | +12.82% | -24.68% |
| 2023 | +28.64% | -19.00% |
| 2022 | -0.97% | -20.88% |
| 2021 | +51.02% | -1.20% |
| 2020 | +15.80% | -2.38% |
| 2019 | +53.97% | +29.52% |
| 2018 | +14.09% | -28.65% |
| 2017 | +2.50% | +30.01% |
| 2016 | +22.07% | -4.56% |
| 2015 | -2.07% | +0.73% |
| 2014 | +13.45% | +6.71% |
| 2013 | +33.37% | +56.31% |
| 2012 | +12.37% | +46.11% |
| 2011 | -27.57% | -2.79% |
| 2010 | +17.92% | +4.41% |
| 2009 | +16.31% | +73.80% |
| 2008 | -26.04% | -53.90% |
| 2007 | -0.57% | +3.47% |
| 2006 | +22.33% | +43.19% |
| 2005 | +0.75% | +15.14% |
| 2004 | -2.37% | +6.69% |
| 2003 | +37.12% | +22.50% |
| 2002 | -12.38% | -38.91% |
| 2001 | N/A | -25.12% |
| 2000 | N/A | +187.24% |
TRI vs PUK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TRI was -62.55%, occurring on May 14, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for PUK was -82.51%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1352 trading sessions.
The current TRI drawdown is -62.48%. The current PUK drawdown is -30.56%.
| Rank | TRI | PUK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -62.55% Jul 14, 2025 - May 14, 2026 | -82.51% May 7, 2007 - Sep 14, 2012 |
| #2 | -56.41% Oct 31, 2007 - Nov 6, 2013 | -68.74% Jan 3, 2001 - Mar 20, 2006 |
| #3 | -35.36% Feb 19, 2020 - Oct 5, 2020 | -63.59% Oct 7, 2021 - Jan 13, 2025 |
| #4 | -26.73% Jun 28, 2002 - May 20, 2003 | -63.54% Jan 24, 2018 - May 7, 2021 |
| #5 | -24.61% Nov 19, 2021 - Feb 13, 2023 | -41.52% May 21, 2015 - Jul 31, 2017 |
| #6 | -20.38% Oct 17, 2017 - Oct 3, 2018 | -23.52% Mar 20, 2006 - Nov 17, 2006 |
| #7 | -18.30% Jan 2, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 | -20.02% May 7, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021 |
| #8 | -17.36% Oct 22, 2015 - Apr 26, 2016 | -19.39% Jul 21, 2000 - Nov 30, 2000 |
| #9 | -14.34% Jun 27, 2023 - Nov 17, 2023 | -15.09% Jan 10, 2014 - Mar 4, 2014 |
| #10 | -13.21% Feb 17, 2005 - Aug 10, 2005 | -14.02% Jan 17, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 |
| #11 | -11.96% May 24, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 | -13.46% May 21, 2013 - Aug 2, 2013 |
| #12 | -11.63% Nov 14, 2013 - Jul 9, 2014 | -13.11% Aug 25, 2014 - Jan 26, 2015 |
| #13 | -11.24% Sep 19, 2005 - Feb 15, 2006 | -11.07% Aug 12, 2013 - Sep 16, 2013 |
| #14 | -11.20% Apr 15, 2015 - Oct 12, 2015 | -8.82% Mar 14, 2013 - Apr 26, 2013 |
| #15 | -10.65% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 | -7.41% Mar 12, 2014 - Apr 30, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between TRI and PUK is 0.41 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
TRI vs PUK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TRI | PUK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.51% | 1.41% |
| 2025 | 1.80% | 1.54% |
| 2024 | 1.35% | 2.64% |
| 2023 | 4.68% | 1.72% |
| 2022 | 1.56% | 1.28% |
| 2021 | 1.76% | 4.60% |
| 2020 | 1.86% | 1.70% |
| 2019 | 2.01% | 17.06% |
| 2018 | 2.87% | 3.71% |
| 2017 | 3.17% | 2.33% |
| 2016 | 3.11% | 3.50% |
| 2015 | 3.54% | 2.62% |
| 2014 | 4.51% | 2.53% |
| 2013 | 3.44% | 2.09% |
| 2012 | 4.41% | 2.84% |
| 2011 | 4.65% | 4.05% |
| 2010 | 3.11% | 2.90% |
| 2009 | 3.47% | 2.99% |
| 2008 | 2.77% | 5.57% |
| 2007 | 1.80% | 2.42% |
| 2006 | 2.12% | 2.21% |
| 2005 | 2.28% | 3.02% |
| 2004 | 2.14% | 6.16% |
| 2003 | 3.18% | 4.28% |
| 2002 | 1.33% | 5.50% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 3.03% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.73% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks