TR vs ZIM
Comparison between Tootsie Roll Industries Inc (TR, Company) and Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM, Company).
TR is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while ZIM is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceZIM has outperformed TR, delivering a return of +18.9% compared to +7.6%
TR vs ZIM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TR vs ZIM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TR vs ZIM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TR | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +9.03% | +19.16% |
| 2025 | +16.86% | +16.70% |
| 2024 | -2.47% | +141.16% |
| 2023 | -19.68% | -22.74% |
| 2022 | +21.55% | -51.08% |
| 2021 | +26.33% | +459.56% |
| 2020 | -10.90% | N/A |
| 2019 | +6.75% | N/A |
| 2018 | -6.65% | N/A |
| 2017 | -4.41% | N/A |
| 2016 | +33.73% | N/A |
| 2015 | +8.65% | N/A |
| 2014 | -0.01% | N/A |
| 2013 | +26.61% | N/A |
| 2012 | +16.12% | N/A |
| 2011 | -16.19% | N/A |
| 2010 | +8.91% | N/A |
| 2009 | +11.00% | N/A |
| 2008 | +1.74% | N/A |
| 2007 | -14.82% | N/A |
| 2006 | +19.67% | N/A |
| 2005 | -8.09% | N/A |
| 2004 | -0.84% | N/A |
| 2003 | +22.04% | N/A |
| 2002 | -17.53% | N/A |
| 2001 | -9.94% | N/A |
| 2000 | +44.18% | N/A |
| 1999 | +4.91% | N/A |
TR vs ZIM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TR was -44.81%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 2718 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ZIM was -85.01%, occurring on Nov 28, 2023. Recovery took 979 trading sessions.
The current TR drawdown is -16.54%. The current ZIM drawdown is -11.56%.
| Rank | TR | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -44.81% May 29, 2002 - Mar 15, 2013 | -85.01% Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 17, 2026 |
| #2 | -36.40% Feb 6, 2023 - Oct 1, 2025 | -29.26% Jun 25, 2021 - Aug 24, 2021 |
| #3 | -30.35% Dec 20, 2016 - Apr 24, 2019 | -28.59% Sep 16, 2021 - Dec 30, 2021 |
| #4 | -30.34% Jan 27, 2021 - Oct 25, 2022 | -18.27% Mar 19, 2021 - Apr 8, 2021 |
| #5 | -29.07% Feb 7, 2001 - May 13, 2002 | -17.91% May 5, 2021 - May 19, 2021 |
| #6 | -27.17% May 22, 2019 - Jan 27, 2021 | -13.81% May 28, 2021 - Jun 11, 2021 |
| #7 | -22.49% Aug 1, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 | -13.55% Feb 19, 2021 - Mar 11, 2021 |
| #8 | -20.03% Oct 16, 2025 - Mar 9, 2026 | -11.94% May 5, 2026 - May 21, 2026 |
| #9 | -17.05% Oct 6, 2000 - Dec 20, 2000 | -10.17% Jan 14, 2022 - Jan 28, 2022 |
| #10 | -16.54% Apr 9, 2026 - May 26, 2026 | -9.86% May 19, 2021 - May 28, 2021 |
| #11 | -14.29% Nov 3, 1999 - May 15, 2000 | -9.85% Apr 16, 2021 - Apr 23, 2021 |
| #12 | -12.69% Jun 9, 2016 - Dec 8, 2016 | -9.02% Jun 11, 2021 - Jun 24, 2021 |
| #13 | -12.16% Mar 23, 2015 - Mar 4, 2016 | -8.71% Feb 20, 2026 - May 5, 2026 |
| #14 | -10.93% Aug 17, 2000 - Oct 6, 2000 | -8.67% Feb 10, 2022 - Mar 3, 2022 |
| #15 | -10.35% Jan 26, 2015 - Mar 20, 2015 | -8.63% Apr 9, 2021 - Apr 16, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between TR and ZIM is 0.36 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
TR vs ZIM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TR | ZIM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.24% | 3.49% |
| 2025 | 0.98% | 20.16% |
| 2024 | 1.11% | 22.40% |
| 2023 | 1.08% | 64.84% |
| 2022 | 0.85% | 160.27% |
| 2021 | 0.99% | 7.65% |
| 2020 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 1.05% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 0.99% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 1.11% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 1.04% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 0.98% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 3.16% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.35% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.11% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.17% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 1.51% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.57% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 3.90% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 4.39% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.81% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.78% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.91% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.72% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.41% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.12% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks