TPR vs DXCM

Comparison between Tapestry Inc (TPR, Company) and Dexcom Inc (DXCM, Company).

TPR is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while DXCM is from the Healthcare sector.

5-Year PerformanceTPR has outperformed DXCM, delivering a return of +28.7% compared to -3.7%

TPR vs DXCM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	TPR(COMPANY)	DXCM(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$27B	$28B
Max Drawdown	86.61%	94.61%
Sharpe Ratio	1.38	-0.38
5Y Beta	1.25	0.84
Industry	Luxury Goods	Medical Devices
P/E Ratio	40.91	29.79
Forward P/E	17.76	23.70
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.39
Dividend Yield	1.18%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	22.17%	9.47%
Debt to Equity	351.20%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	6.39%	5.18%

Market Cap

TPR

$27B

Winner

DXCM

$28B

Max Drawdown

Winner

TPR

86.61%

DXCM

94.61%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

TPR

1.38

DXCM

-0.38

5Y Beta

TPR

1.25

Winner

DXCM

0.84

Industry

TPR

Luxury Goods

DXCM

Medical Devices

P/E Ratio

TPR

40.91

Winner

DXCM

29.79

Forward P/E

Winner

TPR

17.76

DXCM

23.70

PEG Ratio

TPR

N/A

DXCM

0.39

Dividend Yield

TPR

1.18%

DXCM

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

Winner

TPR

22.17%

DXCM

9.47%

Debt to Equity

TPR

351.20%

Winner

DXCM

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

TPR

6.39%

DXCM

5.18%

TPR vs DXCM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	TPR	DXCM
1 month	-11.60%	+10.55%
3 months	-13.32%	-2.24%
6 months	+33.72%	+22.29%
1 year	+66.95%	-18.20%
5 years(CAGR)	+28.73%	-3.66%
10 years(CAGR)	+16.35%	+16.18%
Max(CAGR)	+18.93%	+16.33%

TPR

-11.60%

Winner

DXCM

+10.55%

TPR

-13.32%

Winner

DXCM

-2.24%

Winner

TPR

+33.72%

DXCM

+22.29%

Winner

TPR

+66.95%

DXCM

-18.20%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

TPR

+28.73%

DXCM

-3.66%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

TPR

+16.35%

DXCM

+16.18%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

TPR

+18.93%

DXCM

+16.33%

TPR vs DXCM - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	TPR	DXCM
2026	+5.50%	+7.36%
2025	+97.86%	-15.45%
2024	+76.32%	-36.82%
2023	-1.76%	+8.16%
2022	-3.84%	-13.02%
2021	+25.65%	+50.10%
2020	+17.16%	+68.53%
2019	-17.69%	+89.91%
2018	-23.88%	+106.59%
2017	+28.64%	-1.48%
2016	+7.81%	-23.94%
2015	-8.74%	+50.25%
2014	-30.49%	+58.42%
2013	+4.30%	+155.67%
2012	-5.89%	+43.96%
2011	+13.45%	-32.09%
2010	+54.22%	+59.46%
2009	+67.14%	+192.39%
2008	-32.01%	-69.16%
2007	-30.21%	-10.63%
2006	+29.01%	-32.00%
2005	+21.02%	+27.09%
2004	+52.68%	N/A
2003	+123.84%	N/A
2002	+73.49%	N/A
2001	+49.17%	N/A
2000	+46.54%	N/A

TPR vs DXCM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TPR was -82.56%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 3181 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for DXCM was -94.61%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1828 trading sessions.

The current TPR drawdown is -15.16%. The current DXCM drawdown is -56.12%.

Rank	TPR	DXCM
#1	-82.56% Mar 26, 2012 - Nov 14, 2024	-94.61% May 4, 2006 - Aug 8, 2013
#2	-78.19% Apr 20, 2007 - Nov 5, 2010	-66.32% Nov 17, 2021 - Nov 10, 2025
#3	-48.10% Jul 17, 2001 - Jan 18, 2002	-56.37% Sep 17, 2015 - Jul 11, 2018
#4	-39.45% May 17, 2002 - Oct 23, 2002	-39.59% Mar 5, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014
#5	-34.47% Feb 2, 2001 - May 16, 2001	-36.81% Feb 20, 2020 - Apr 16, 2020
#6	-32.03% Jul 6, 2011 - Jan 24, 2012	-35.06% Jun 13, 2005 - Dec 16, 2005
#7	-31.76% Feb 19, 2025 - Jul 3, 2025	-30.94% Aug 5, 2020 - Jul 23, 2021
#8	-30.81% Mar 14, 2006 - Oct 24, 2006	-27.76% Nov 9, 2018 - Jan 17, 2019
#9	-21.95% Dec 29, 2000 - Jan 17, 2001	-27.07% Feb 12, 2019 - Jun 19, 2019
#10	-21.80% Jul 1, 2004 - Oct 29, 2004	-19.60% Sep 11, 2018 - Nov 8, 2018
#11	-21.54% Dec 11, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000	-18.16% May 11, 2020 - Jul 6, 2020
#12	-20.10% Jul 19, 2005 - Nov 25, 2005	-17.10% Aug 28, 2019 - Nov 7, 2019
#13	-19.20% Feb 26, 2026 - May 15, 2026	-16.61% Apr 14, 2005 - May 16, 2005
#14	-15.71% Aug 13, 2025 - Sep 18, 2025	-12.93% Aug 14, 2015 - Sep 17, 2015
#15	-15.67% Jan 7, 2003 - Feb 28, 2003	-11.86% Dec 4, 2019 - Jan 7, 2020