TNA vs GEM
Comparison between DIREXION DAILY SMALL CAP BULL 3X SHARES (TNA, ETF) and GOLDMAN SACHS ACTIVEBETA(R) EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY ETF (GEM, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceGEM has outperformed TNA, delivering a return of +6.2% compared to -7.5%
TNA vs GEM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TNA vs GEM - Holdings Comparison
TNA and GEM have 0 common holdings. Overlap is 0.00%
TNA's top 25 holdings weight is 66.95%. GEM's top 25 holdings weight is 44.02%.
| Rank | TNA | GEM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | ISHARES RUSSELL 2000 ETF (IWM) - 66.95% | n/a (n/a) - 13.89% |
| #2 | N/A | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD (n/a) - 7.19% |
| #3 | N/A | SK HYNIX INC (n/a) - 5.92% |
| #4 | N/A | TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD (n/a) - 2.71% |
| #5 | N/A | n/a (n/a) - 1.96% |
| #6 | N/A | MEDIATEK INC (n/a) - 1.51% |
| #7 | N/A | GOLDMAN SACHS FS TREASURY OBLIGS INSTL (FTOXX) - 1.34% |
| #8 | N/A | DELTA ELECTRONICS INC (n/a) - 0.90% |
| #9 | N/A | n/a (n/a) - 0.85% |
| #10 | N/A | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP CLASS H (n/a) - 0.79% |
| #11 | N/A | n/a (n/a) - 0.77% |
| #12 | N/A | ISHARES MSCI MALAYSIA ETF (EWM) - 0.58% |
| #13 | N/A | HDFC BANK LTD (n/a) - 0.57% |
| #14 | N/A | SAMSUNG ELECTRO-MECHANICS CO LTD (n/a) - 0.56% |
| #15 | N/A | ICICI BANK LTD (n/a) - 0.50% |
| #16 | N/A | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO LTD (n/a) - 0.46% |
| #17 | N/A | RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD (n/a) - 0.44% |
| #18 | N/A | LG ELECTRONICS INC (n/a) - 0.44% |
| #19 | N/A | PDD HOLDINGS INC ADR (PDD) - 0.43% |
| #20 | N/A | n/a (n/a) - 0.40% |
| #21 | N/A | n/a (n/a) - 0.39% |
| #22 | N/A | XIAOMI CORP CLASS B (n/a) - 0.37% |
| #23 | N/A | ELITE MATERIAL CO LTD (n/a) - 0.36% |
| #24 | N/A | OTP BANK PLC (n/a) - 0.35% |
| #25 | N/A | BANK OF CHINA LTD CLASS H (n/a) - 0.34% |
| Total Holdings | 1 | 752 |
TNA vs GEM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TNA vs GEM - Annual Returns (2008 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TNA | GEM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +32.82% | +15.16% |
| 2025 | +9.73% | +33.75% |
| 2024 | +9.18% | +7.92% |
| 2023 | +28.43% | +10.95% |
| 2022 | -63.78% | -21.72% |
| 2021 | +33.40% | -0.75% |
| 2020 | -7.95% | +11.23% |
| 2019 | +68.96% | +17.26% |
| 2018 | -41.55% | -15.62% |
| 2017 | +37.32% | +35.16% |
| 2016 | +70.92% | +12.61% |
| 2015 | -20.16% | +2.95% |
| 2014 | +8.80% | N/A |
| 2013 | +126.10% | N/A |
| 2012 | +36.07% | N/A |
| 2011 | -41.16% | N/A |
| 2010 | +57.25% | N/A |
| 2009 | +35.20% | N/A |
| 2008 | +40.87% | N/A |
TNA vs GEM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TNA was -88.09%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 612 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GEM was -37.01%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 720 trading sessions.
The current TNA drawdown is -42.15%. The current GEM drawdown is -8.52%.
| Rank | TNA | GEM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -88.09% Aug 31, 2018 - Feb 8, 2021 | -37.01% Jan 26, 2018 - Dec 4, 2020 |
| #2 | -82.37% Nov 8, 2021 - Apr 8, 2025 | -36.24% Feb 17, 2021 - Jul 16, 2025 |
| #3 | -73.06% Jan 6, 2009 - Aug 4, 2009 | -19.70% Oct 13, 2015 - Jul 14, 2016 |
| #4 | -70.56% Apr 29, 2011 - May 10, 2013 | -13.50% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026 |
| #5 | -62.64% Jun 23, 2015 - Nov 25, 2016 | -9.68% Sep 6, 2016 - Feb 9, 2017 |
| #6 | -53.47% Apr 23, 2010 - Dec 17, 2010 | -8.52% Jun 2, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026 |
| #7 | -35.80% Mar 4, 2014 - Feb 19, 2015 | -5.20% Jan 21, 2021 - Feb 9, 2021 |
| #8 | -35.14% Nov 28, 2008 - Jan 2, 2009 | -5.15% May 11, 2026 - May 26, 2026 |
| #9 | -30.06% Mar 15, 2021 - Nov 5, 2021 | -5.13% Nov 22, 2017 - Dec 29, 2017 |
| #10 | -27.64% Oct 14, 2009 - Dec 23, 2009 | -4.73% Oct 29, 2025 - Dec 30, 2025 |
| #11 | -26.15% Jan 19, 2010 - Mar 3, 2010 | -4.25% Oct 6, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025 |
| #12 | -25.61% Jan 23, 2018 - May 21, 2018 | -3.50% May 16, 2017 - Jun 8, 2017 |
| #13 | -21.06% Jan 22, 2014 - Feb 27, 2014 | -3.47% Jan 28, 2026 - Feb 9, 2026 |
| #14 | -21.01% Nov 19, 2008 - Nov 24, 2008 | -3.45% Aug 15, 2016 - Sep 6, 2016 |
| #15 | -19.98% Feb 9, 2021 - Mar 11, 2021 | -3.33% Sep 19, 2017 - Oct 5, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between TNA and GEM is 0.36 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2008 - 2026)
TNA vs GEM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TNA | GEM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.03% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 0.78% | 2.30% |
| 2024 | 0.93% | 2.58% |
| 2023 | 1.27% | 2.97% |
| 2022 | 0.31% | 2.96% |
| 2021 | 0.06% | 3.00% |
| 2020 | 0.03% | 1.63% |
| 2019 | 0.44% | 3.13% |
| 2018 | 0.36% | 2.08% |
| 2017 | 0.15% | 1.81% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 1.98% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 0.25% |
| 2014 | 0.59% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 1.53% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.15% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 11.16% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 0.12% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks