TMUS vs NVO
Comparison between T-Mobile US Inc (TMUS, Company) and Novo Nordisk (NVO, Company).
TMUS is from the Communication Services sector, while NVO is from the Healthcare sector.
5-Year PerformanceTMUS has outperformed NVO, delivering a return of +5.9% compared to +5.2%
TMUS vs NVO - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TMUS vs NVO - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TMUS vs NVO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TMUS | NVO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -6.58% | -6.36% |
| 2025 | -6.09% | -40.30% |
| 2024 | +38.32% | -14.82% |
| 2023 | +15.81% | +52.98% |
| 2022 | +22.35% | +26.30% |
| 2021 | -12.42% | +59.85% |
| 2020 | +71.59% | +22.30% |
| 2019 | +20.17% | +26.72% |
| 2018 | -0.67% | -13.76% |
| 2017 | +8.90% | +52.70% |
| 2016 | +47.65% | -36.16% |
| 2015 | +43.30% | +38.20% |
| 2014 | -19.27% | +16.84% |
| 2013 | +416.85% | +12.95% |
| 2012 | +5.86% | +41.35% |
| 2011 | -33.59% | +4.80% |
| 2010 | +58.47% | +73.64% |
| 2009 | -48.65% | +22.93% |
| 2008 | -20.38% | -18.66% |
| 2007 | -29.01% | +57.08% |
| 2006 | N/A | +48.69% |
| 2005 | N/A | +7.34% |
| 2004 | N/A | +33.06% |
| 2003 | N/A | +40.89% |
| 2002 | N/A | -27.39% |
| 2001 | N/A | +13.36% |
| 2000 | N/A | +32.47% |
| 1999 | N/A | +6.16% |
TMUS vs NVO Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TMUS was -86.29%, occurring on Jan 28, 2010. Recovery took 1576 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NVO was -74.71%, occurring on Mar 27, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current TMUS drawdown is -30.83%. The current NVO drawdown is -65.58%.
| Rank | TMUS | NVO |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -86.29% Jul 17, 2007 - Oct 17, 2013 | -74.71% Jun 25, 2024 - Mar 27, 2026 |
| #2 | -33.66% Mar 3, 2025 - Jun 4, 2026 | -51.38% Aug 6, 2001 - Feb 9, 2004 |
| #3 | -31.99% Jul 16, 2021 - Oct 28, 2022 | -46.53% Aug 3, 2015 - Jan 19, 2018 |
| #4 | -29.52% May 29, 2014 - May 20, 2015 | -41.56% Apr 8, 2008 - Feb 16, 2010 |
| #5 | -26.04% Feb 19, 2020 - May 18, 2020 | -28.04% Apr 21, 2011 - Feb 7, 2012 |
| #6 | -21.24% Sep 23, 2015 - Jun 2, 2016 | -27.56% Jan 26, 2018 - Nov 1, 2019 |
| #7 | -18.97% Jun 2, 2017 - Sep 13, 2018 | -26.73% Sep 26, 2000 - Jun 20, 2001 |
| #8 | -16.97% Dec 2, 2022 - Dec 1, 2023 | -23.65% Mar 4, 2020 - Apr 20, 2020 |
| #9 | -16.47% Dec 31, 2013 - May 19, 2014 | -21.43% Feb 6, 2013 - Jan 10, 2014 |
| #10 | -14.43% Nov 29, 2024 - Feb 6, 2025 | -21.36% Apr 7, 2022 - Nov 28, 2022 |
| #11 | -13.75% Sep 27, 2018 - Feb 14, 2019 | -20.48% Dec 16, 2021 - Apr 6, 2022 |
| #12 | -12.70% Jan 8, 2021 - May 6, 2021 | -19.00% Apr 21, 2005 - Mar 3, 2006 |
| #13 | -11.43% Jul 26, 2019 - Feb 7, 2020 | -16.44% Jan 10, 2000 - May 3, 2000 |
| #14 | -11.31% Jun 4, 2007 - Jul 12, 2007 | -14.94% Dec 4, 2007 - Feb 22, 2008 |
| #15 | -10.23% Nov 4, 2013 - Dec 19, 2013 | -14.66% Oct 22, 2012 - Jan 10, 2013 |
Correlation
Correlation between TMUS and NVO is 0.82 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
TMUS vs NVO dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TMUS | NVO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.11% | 2.57% |
| 2025 | 1.80% | 3.31% |
| 2024 | 1.28% | 1.68% |
| 2023 | 0.41% | 1.00% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 1.20% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.35% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 1.87% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 1.45% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 1.52% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 2.87% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 1.43% |
| 2013 | 24.08% | 1.23% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 1.12% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 1.18% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 1.22% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 1.32% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 0.69% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 0.83% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.10% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 0.96% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 0.92% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 0.98% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.57% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.53% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks