TMQ vs CLB

Comparison between Trilogy Metals Inc (TMQ, Company) and Core Laboratories Inc (CLB, Company).

TMQ is from the Basic Materials sector, while CLB is from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceTMQ has outperformed CLB, delivering a return of +8.3% compared to -18.4%

TMQ vs CLB - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	TMQ(COMPANY)	CLB(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$549M	$552M
Max Drawdown	96.55%	96.31%
Sharpe Ratio	0.81	0.23
5Y Beta	1.46	1.24
Industry	Other Industrial Metals & Mining	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
P/E Ratio	-31.26	19.09
Forward P/E	N/A	19.76
PEG Ratio	-0.58	3.79
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.35%
5Y Dividends CAGR	N/A	0.00%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	42.57%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-1.02%	4.07%
P/S Ratio	N/A	1.05
P/B Ratio	4.44	1.96

Market Cap

TMQ

$549M

Winner

CLB

$552M

Max Drawdown

TMQ

96.55%

Winner

CLB

96.31%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

TMQ

0.81

CLB

0.23

5Y Beta

TMQ

1.46

Winner

CLB

1.24

Industry

TMQ

Other Industrial Metals & Mining

CLB

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

P/E Ratio

Winner

TMQ

-31.26

CLB

19.09

Forward P/E

TMQ

N/A

CLB

19.76

PEG Ratio

Winner

TMQ

-0.58

CLB

3.79

Dividend Yield

TMQ

N/A

CLB

0.35%

5Y Dividends CAGR

TMQ

N/A

CLB

0.00%

Debt to Equity

Winner

TMQ

0.00%

CLB

42.57%

Free Cash Flow Yield

TMQ

-1.02%

Winner

CLB

4.07%

P/S Ratio

TMQ

N/A

CLB

1.05

P/B Ratio

TMQ

4.44

Winner

CLB

1.96

TMQ vs CLB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	TMQ	CLB
1 month	-11.38%	+1.46%
3 months	-24.70%	-30.68%
6 months	-49.19%	-39.23%
1 year	+57.75%	-6.15%
5 years(CAGR)	+8.28%	-18.45%
10 years(CAGR)	+18.07%	-19.78%
Max(CAGR)	-2.79%	+1.80%

TMQ

-11.38%

Winner

CLB

+1.46%

Winner

TMQ

-24.70%

CLB

-30.68%

TMQ

-49.19%

Winner

CLB

-39.23%

Winner

TMQ

+57.75%

CLB

-6.15%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

TMQ

+8.28%

CLB

-18.45%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

TMQ

+18.07%

CLB

-19.78%

Max(CAGR)

TMQ

-2.79%

Winner

CLB

+1.80%

TMQ vs CLB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	TMQ	CLB
2026	-31.26%	-30.23%
2025	+262.18%	-11.95%
2024	+171.28%	-0.80%
2023	-24.56%	-7.33%
2022	-67.65%	-16.88%
2021	-17.91%	-19.29%
2020	-23.37%	-30.42%
2019	+44.44%	-34.57%
2018	+46.61%	-45.70%
2017	+114.61%	-8.10%
2016	+83.67%	+14.09%
2015	-48.99%	-7.01%
2014	-67.97%	-35.33%
2013	-23.62%	+71.69%
2012	-61.65%	-4.52%
2011	N/A	+28.72%
2010	N/A	+47.40%
2009	N/A	+85.09%
2008	N/A	-51.75%
2007	N/A	+60.64%
2006	N/A	+109.84%
2005	N/A	+63.64%
2004	N/A	+38.66%
2003	N/A	+44.75%
2002	N/A	-21.72%
2001	N/A	-45.55%
2000	N/A	+41.87%
1999	N/A	+9.59%

TMQ vs CLB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TMQ was -96.55%, occurring on Jan 20, 2016. Recovery took 3382 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CLB was -95.78%, occurring on Mar 17, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current TMQ drawdown is -70.24%. The current CLB drawdown is -93.68%.

Rank	TMQ	CLB
#1	-96.55% Apr 25, 2012 - Oct 7, 2025	-95.78% Apr 21, 2014 - Mar 17, 2020
#2	-71.98% Oct 14, 2025 - Jul 16, 2026	-74.19% Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 29, 2005
#3	-9.47% Oct 9, 2025 - Oct 13, 2025	-65.25% Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 22, 2010
#4	-2.92% Oct 7, 2025 - Oct 9, 2025	-31.21% May 2, 2012 - Apr 22, 2013
#5	N/A	-29.26% May 5, 2006 - Jul 27, 2006
#6	N/A	-27.02% Sep 5, 2006 - Nov 14, 2006
#7	N/A	-26.37% Jul 15, 2011 - Dec 1, 2011
#8	N/A	-20.07% Dec 8, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007
#9	N/A	-18.95% Nov 19, 1999 - Mar 1, 2000
#10	N/A	-15.49% Sep 7, 2005 - Nov 1, 2005
#11	N/A	-15.11% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 18, 2010
#12	N/A	-14.26% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000
#13	N/A	-13.63% Oct 18, 2010 - Dec 7, 2010
#14	N/A	-13.09% Apr 4, 2011 - Jun 20, 2011
#15	N/A	-11.32% Aug 10, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007