TMP vs CXM

Comparison between Tompkins Financial Corp (TMP, Company) and Sprinklr Inc Class A (CXM, Company).

TMP is from the Financial Services sector, while CXM is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceTMP has outperformed CXM, delivering a return of +5.5% compared to -21.4%

TMP vs CXM - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	TMP(COMPANY)	CXM(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.29B	$1.29B
Max Drawdown	54.68%	79.84%
Sharpe Ratio	1.47	-1.13
5Y Beta	0.95	0.96
Industry	Banks - Regional	Software - Application
P/E Ratio	14.14	73.57
Forward P/E	12.85	20.70
PEG Ratio	0.03	0.82
Dividend Yield	2.81%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	8.79%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	2.95%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	11.21%	11.22%
P/S Ratio	2.92	1.44
P/B Ratio	1.36	2.57

Market Cap

TMP

$1.29B

Winner

CXM

$1.29B

Max Drawdown

Winner

TMP

54.68%

CXM

79.84%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

TMP

1.47

CXM

-1.13

5Y Beta

Winner

TMP

0.95

CXM

0.96

Industry

TMP

Banks - Regional

CXM

Software - Application

P/E Ratio

Winner

TMP

14.14

CXM

73.57

Forward P/E

Winner

TMP

12.85

CXM

20.70

PEG Ratio

Winner

TMP

0.03

CXM

0.82

Dividend Yield

TMP

2.81%

CXM

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

TMP

8.79%

CXM

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

TMP

2.95%

CXM

N/A

Debt to Equity

TMP

0.00%

CXM

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

TMP

11.21%

Winner

CXM

11.22%

P/S Ratio

TMP

2.92

Winner

CXM

1.44

P/B Ratio

Winner

TMP

1.36

CXM

2.57

TMP vs CXM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	TMP	CXM
1 month	+10.38%	+3.91%
3 months	+22.65%	-7.49%
6 months	+21.87%	-31.13%
1 year	+54.25%	-35.32%
5 years(CAGR)	+5.46%	-21.40%
10 years(CAGR)	+6.34%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+9.29%	-21.40%

Winner

TMP

+10.38%

CXM

+3.91%

Winner

TMP

+22.65%

CXM

-7.49%

Winner

TMP

+21.87%

CXM

-31.13%

Winner

TMP

+54.25%

CXM

-35.32%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

TMP

+5.46%

CXM

-21.40%

10Y(CAGR)

TMP

+6.34%

CXM

N/A

Max(CAGR)

Winner

TMP

+9.29%

CXM

-21.40%

TMP vs CXM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	TMP	CXM
2026	+26.92%	-27.46%
2025	+12.90%	-8.90%
2024	+19.63%	-28.39%
2023	-18.67%	+49.19%
2022	-4.99%	-48.71%
2021	+24.22%	-9.83%
2020	-20.29%	N/A
2019	+23.83%	N/A
2018	-5.29%	N/A
2017	-12.73%	N/A
2016	+77.26%	N/A
2015	+6.21%	N/A
2014	+14.31%	N/A
2013	+30.36%	N/A
2012	+3.97%	N/A
2011	-1.51%	N/A
2010	+8.35%	N/A
2009	-24.50%	N/A
2008	+59.21%	N/A
2007	-11.66%	N/A
2006	+13.41%	N/A
2005	-2.27%	N/A
2004	+19.23%	N/A
2003	+18.73%	N/A
2002	+14.92%	N/A
2001	+49.85%	N/A
2000	+1.57%	N/A
1999	-1.23%	N/A

TMP vs CXM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TMP was -47.80%, occurring on Apr 17, 2024. Recovery took 1220 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CXM was -79.84%, occurring on Apr 23, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current TMP drawdown is -1.56%. The current CXM drawdown is -77.88%.

Rank	TMP	CXM
#1	-47.80% Mar 12, 2021 - Jan 21, 2026	-79.84% Jun 28, 2021 - Apr 23, 2026
#2	-44.80% Dec 30, 2008 - Jul 5, 2013	N/A
#3	-39.72% Jan 16, 2020 - Mar 8, 2021	N/A
#4	-37.67% Oct 30, 2006 - Mar 18, 2008	N/A
#5	-31.65% Sep 19, 2008 - Nov 26, 2008	N/A
#6	-28.21% Apr 16, 2008 - Sep 18, 2008	N/A
#7	-25.45% Nov 22, 1999 - Mar 29, 2001	N/A
#8	-24.02% Jan 4, 2017 - Dec 12, 2019	N/A
#9	-21.51% May 16, 2001 - Aug 16, 2001	N/A
#10	-21.28% May 3, 2002 - Jun 28, 2002	N/A
#11	-21.17% Dec 15, 2004 - Dec 9, 2005	N/A
#12	-18.02% Dec 1, 2015 - Mar 11, 2016	N/A
#13	-17.62% Jun 28, 2002 - Mar 25, 2003	N/A
#14	-15.29% Sep 23, 2003 - Nov 24, 2004	N/A
#15	-13.51% Nov 26, 2008 - Dec 19, 2008	N/A

Correlation

Correlation between TMP and CXM is -0.41 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.41

-101