TM vs WFC
Comparison between Toyota Motor Corporation (TM, Company) and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC, Company).
TM is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while WFC is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceWFC has outperformed TM, delivering a return of +12.9% compared to +6.7%
TM vs WFC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TM vs WFC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TM vs WFC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -13.93% | -19.69% |
| 2025 | +14.71% | +35.66% |
| 2024 | +10.10% | +46.15% |
| 2023 | +36.47% | +21.46% |
| 2022 | -24.81% | -16.66% |
| 2021 | +24.20% | +63.73% |
| 2020 | +12.26% | -41.61% |
| 2019 | +22.49% | +19.18% |
| 2018 | -6.75% | -22.36% |
| 2017 | +10.83% | +11.39% |
| 2016 | -0.23% | +7.53% |
| 2015 | +3.20% | +2.07% |
| 2014 | +7.00% | +25.14% |
| 2013 | +29.82% | +33.32% |
| 2012 | +40.05% | +23.48% |
| 2011 | -15.35% | -11.23% |
| 2010 | -6.33% | +14.23% |
| 2009 | +28.90% | -7.77% |
| 2008 | -36.78% | +5.69% |
| 2007 | -20.02% | -12.57% |
| 2006 | +28.83% | +15.04% |
| 2005 | +30.52% | +4.88% |
| 2004 | +20.14% | +10.32% |
| 2003 | +29.25% | +24.92% |
| 2002 | +4.74% | +10.33% |
| 2001 | -18.72% | -17.66% |
| 2000 | -34.77% | +45.45% |
| 1999 | +42.68% | -13.36% |
TM vs WFC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TM was -60.16%, occurring on Apr 14, 2003. Recovery took 1423 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for WFC was -78.98%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 1122 trading sessions.
The current TM drawdown is -24.47%. The current WFC drawdown is -20.68%.
| Rank | TM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -60.16% Apr 25, 2000 - Dec 21, 2005 | -78.98% Sep 19, 2008 - Mar 7, 2013 |
| #2 | -56.11% Jan 4, 2007 - May 13, 2013 | -64.47% Jan 26, 2018 - Feb 8, 2022 |
| #3 | -36.79% Jan 13, 2022 - Jan 19, 2024 | -43.56% Oct 5, 2007 - Sep 18, 2008 |
| #4 | -34.92% Mar 27, 2024 - Feb 4, 2026 | -37.07% Feb 9, 2022 - Mar 4, 2024 |
| #5 | -27.92% Mar 30, 2015 - Jan 3, 2018 | -35.23% Nov 16, 1999 - Jun 2, 2000 |
| #6 | -25.20% Nov 11, 2019 - Nov 11, 2020 | -29.24% Dec 28, 2000 - Jul 14, 2003 |
| #7 | -24.47% Feb 13, 2026 - May 8, 2026 | -24.73% Feb 6, 2025 - Jul 1, 2025 |
| #8 | -22.65% May 5, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 | -22.76% Jan 6, 2026 - Mar 13, 2026 |
| #9 | -20.90% Aug 2, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 | -22.43% Jul 22, 2015 - Dec 7, 2016 |
| #10 | -18.07% May 10, 2018 - Sep 13, 2019 | -19.77% Jun 2, 2000 - Oct 3, 2000 |
| #11 | -17.21% Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 27, 2000 | -16.65% May 15, 2024 - Oct 14, 2024 |
| #12 | -11.75% May 21, 2013 - Jul 17, 2013 | -15.81% Mar 1, 2017 - Dec 5, 2017 |
| #13 | -11.53% Jan 17, 2018 - May 10, 2018 | -12.69% Oct 3, 2000 - Nov 9, 2000 |
| #14 | -11.45% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021 | -11.11% Nov 26, 2024 - Jan 21, 2025 |
| #15 | -9.96% Sep 29, 2021 - Nov 16, 2021 | -10.33% Sep 19, 2014 - Nov 3, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between TM and WFC is 0.89 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
TM vs WFC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TM | WFC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.19% |
| 2025 | 2.95% | 1.82% |
| 2024 | 2.81% | 2.14% |
| 2023 | 2.45% | 2.64% |
| 2022 | 2.90% | 2.66% |
| 2021 | 2.45% | 1.25% |
| 2020 | 2.74% | 4.04% |
| 2019 | 1.30% | 3.57% |
| 2018 | 3.40% | 3.56% |
| 2017 | 2.96% | 2.54% |
| 2016 | 3.23% | 2.75% |
| 2015 | 5.59% | 2.71% |
| 2014 | 2.57% | 2.46% |
| 2013 | 2.08% | 2.53% |
| 2012 | 1.59% | 2.57% |
| 2011 | 1.90% | 1.74% |
| 2010 | 1.31% | 0.65% |
| 2009 | 1.41% | 1.82% |
| 2008 | 4.19% | 4.41% |
| 2007 | 2.19% | 3.91% |
| 2006 | 1.99% | 3.04% |
| 2005 | 1.17% | 3.18% |
| 2004 | 1.07% | 2.99% |
| 2003 | 0.91% | 2.55% |
| 2002 | 1.21% | 2.35% |
| 2001 | 0.72% | 2.30% |
| 2000 | 0.93% | 1.62% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.49% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks