StockComparison Logo
vs

TK vs CLDT-P-A

Comparison between Teekay Corp (TK, Company) and Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT-P-A, Company).

5-Year PerformanceTK has outperformed CLDT-P-A, delivering a return of +46.3% compared to +2.3%

TK vs CLDT-P-A - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
TK
$958M
CLDT-P-A
$953M
Max Drawdown
TK
97.44%
Winner
CLDT-P-A
33.51%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
TK
1.39
CLDT-P-A
0.25
5Y Beta
TK
0.48
Winner
CLDT-P-A
0.19
Industry
TK
Oil & Gas Midstream
CLDT-P-A
N/A
P/E Ratio
Winner
TK
9.76
CLDT-P-A
108.74
Forward P/E
TK
9.61
CLDT-P-A
N/A
PEG Ratio
TK
1.49
CLDT-P-A
N/A
Dividend Yield
TK
10.10%
CLDT-P-A
N/A
Debt to Equity
Winner
TK
0.00%
CLDT-P-A
58.67%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
TK
11.64%
CLDT-P-A
7.68%
P/S Ratio
TK
0.96
CLDT-P-A
N/A
P/B Ratio
TK
1.36
CLDT-P-A
N/A

TK vs CLDT-P-A - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
TK
-7.13%
Winner
CLDT-P-A
+1.61%
3M
TK
-6.53%
Winner
CLDT-P-A
+2.62%
6M
Winner
TK
+25.54%
CLDT-P-A
+2.14%
1Y
Winner
TK
+58.15%
CLDT-P-A
+6.77%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
TK
+46.31%
CLDT-P-A
+2.29%
10Y(CAGR)
TK
+12.44%
CLDT-P-A
N/A
Max(CAGR)
Winner
TK
+6.08%
CLDT-P-A
+2.93%

TK vs CLDT-P-A - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearTKCLDT-P-A
2026+37.35%+6.28%
2025+42.82%-4.61%
2024+36.60%+12.20%
2023+60.67%+19.98%
2022+37.99%-19.01%
2021+32.49%+7.24%
2020-59.13%N/A
2019+56.62%N/A
2018-65.00%N/A
2017+10.75%N/A
2016-18.83%N/A
2015-79.42%N/A
2014+10.10%N/A
2013+47.95%N/A
2012+25.26%N/A
2011-16.03%N/A
2010+44.44%N/A
2009+15.49%N/A
2008-61.81%N/A
2007+26.30%N/A
2006+10.92%N/A
2005+0.10%N/A
2004+49.67%N/A
2003+39.23%N/A
2002+22.74%N/A
2001-8.71%N/A
2000+147.35%N/A
1999+7.12%N/A

TK vs CLDT-P-A Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TK was -97.04%, occurring on Nov 4, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CLDT-P-A was -29.73%, occurring on Oct 25, 2022. Recovery took 661 trading sessions.

The current TK drawdown is -66.12%. The current CLDT-P-A drawdown is -2.82%.

RankTKCLDT-P-A
#1-97.04%
Oct 3, 2014 - Nov 4, 2020		-29.73%
Jan 10, 2022 - Aug 28, 2024
#2-80.80%
May 9, 2007 - Dec 27, 2013		-18.78%
Nov 29, 2024 - Apr 10, 2025
#3-50.94%
May 21, 2001 - Nov 5, 2003		-5.92%
Sep 2, 2021 - Oct 14, 2021
#4-36.88%
Sep 7, 2000 - Apr 18, 2001		-4.37%
Jul 26, 2021 - Sep 2, 2021
#5-32.95%
Nov 26, 2004 - Mar 16, 2007		-4.32%
Oct 27, 2021 - Dec 23, 2021
#6-15.49%
Mar 17, 2004 - Jun 1, 2004		-3.38%
Sep 24, 2024 - Oct 30, 2024
#7-14.83%
Jul 19, 2000 - Aug 16, 2000		-2.73%
Jan 3, 2022 - Jan 10, 2022
#8-14.12%
Jul 20, 2004 - Sep 22, 2004		-2.42%
Oct 30, 2024 - Nov 15, 2024
#9-12.34%
Jun 26, 2014 - Sep 30, 2014		-1.77%
Aug 29, 2024 - Sep 10, 2024
#10-12.17%
Mar 31, 2000 - Apr 20, 2000		-1.67%
Dec 23, 2021 - Dec 31, 2021
#11-10.74%
Apr 26, 2001 - May 21, 2001		-1.48%
Nov 18, 2024 - Nov 29, 2024
#12-9.30%
Jan 27, 2000 - Feb 16, 2000		-1.48%
Jul 9, 2021 - Jul 22, 2021
#13-9.26%
Oct 6, 2004 - Oct 26, 2004		-1.29%
Sep 16, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024
#14-9.26%
May 1, 2000 - May 17, 2000		-1.21%
Oct 14, 2021 - Oct 27, 2021
#15-8.93%
Jun 1, 2000 - Jul 7, 2000		-0.77%
Sep 10, 2024 - Sep 12, 2024

Correlation

Correlation between TK and CLDT-P-A is 0.66 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.66
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

TK vs CLDT-P-A dividend yield comparison.

YearTKCLDT-P-A
20268.93%4.12%
202511.07%8.41%
202446.90%7.31%
20230.00%7.52%
20220.00%8.27%
20210.00%3.38%
20191.03%0.00%
20186.59%0.00%
20172.36%0.00%
20162.74%0.00%
201517.55%0.00%
20142.49%0.00%
20132.70%0.00%
20123.94%0.00%
20114.73%0.00%
20103.82%0.00%
20095.45%0.00%
20085.81%0.00%
20071.86%0.00%
20061.98%0.00%
20051.55%0.00%
20041.22%0.00%
20031.57%0.00%
20022.11%0.00%
20012.47%0.00%
20002.32%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare

Popular: TK vs SPYCLDT-P-A vs SPY