StockComparison Logo
vs

TIMB vs FRT

Comparison between TIM SA (TIMB, Company) and Federal Realty Investment Trust. (FRT, Company).

TIMB is from the Communication Services sector, while FRT is from the Real Estate sector.

5-Year PerformanceTIMB has outperformed FRT, delivering a return of +22.4% compared to +4.8%

TIMB vs FRT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
TIMB
$10B
Winner
FRT
$10B
Max Drawdown
Winner
TIMB
39.99%
FRT
61.37%
Sharpe Ratio
TIMB
0.64
Winner
FRT
1.56
5Y Beta
Winner
TIMB
0.46
FRT
0.58
Industry
TIMB
Telecom Services
FRT
Reit - Retail
P/E Ratio
Winner
TIMB
12.92
FRT
20.52
Forward P/E
Winner
TIMB
10.10
FRT
41.67
PEG Ratio
Winner
TIMB
0.17
FRT
0.32
Dividend Yield
Winner
TIMB
6.80%
FRT
3.68%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
TIMB
28.47%
FRT
5.80%
5Y EPS CAGR
TIMB
17.83%
Winner
FRT
29.35%
Debt to Equity
TIMB
68.55%
Winner
FRT
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
TIMB
16.27%
FRT
6.04%
P/S Ratio
Winner
TIMB
0.39
FRT
7.97
P/B Ratio
Winner
TIMB
2.21
FRT
3.34

TIMB vs FRT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
TIMB
+1.92%
FRT
-2.11%
3M
TIMB
-20.40%
Winner
FRT
+13.43%
6M
TIMB
+6.44%
Winner
FRT
+21.12%
1Y
TIMB
+23.20%
Winner
FRT
+33.06%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
TIMB
+22.45%
FRT
+4.77%
10Y(CAGR)
TIMB
N/A
FRT
+0.57%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
TIMB
+18.83%
FRT
+11.93%

TIMB vs FRT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearTIMBFRT
2026+10.93%+24.32%
2025+85.62%-4.27%
2024-31.81%+10.55%
2023+83.25%+4.98%
2022+8.80%-22.89%
2021-12.04%+71.67%
2020+25.01%-28.65%
2019N/A+14.66%
2018N/A-8.78%
2017N/A-4.46%
2016N/A+0.62%
2015N/A+10.42%
2014N/A+35.92%
2013N/A-0.85%
2012N/A+18.73%
2011N/A+17.07%
2010N/A+20.40%
2009N/A+19.49%
2008N/A-21.50%
2007N/A+0.03%
2006N/A+42.57%
2005N/A+23.58%
2004N/A+39.95%
2003N/A+43.36%
2002N/A+31.72%
2001N/A+31.86%
2000N/A+10.87%
1999N/A+2.73%

TIMB vs FRT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for TIMB was -37.05%, occurring on Jan 10, 2025. Recovery took 304 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for FRT was -57.45%, occurring on Mar 2, 2009. Recovery took 855 trading sessions.

The current TIMB drawdown is -21.48%. The current FRT drawdown is -3.20%.

RankTIMBFRT
#1-37.05%
Feb 27, 2024 - May 14, 2025
-57.45%
Oct 5, 2007 - Feb 28, 2011
#2-31.29%
Apr 1, 2022 - Jun 6, 2023
-56.51%
Aug 1, 2016 - May 21, 2026
#3-29.09%
Dec 29, 2020 - Mar 22, 2022
-25.68%
Apr 1, 2004 - Sep 7, 2004
#4-25.89%
Apr 10, 2026 - Jun 18, 2026
-22.95%
Feb 7, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007
#5-15.61%
Nov 11, 2025 - Jan 20, 2026
-17.85%
May 15, 2013 - Mar 31, 2014
#6-14.09%
Oct 22, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020
-16.59%
Jul 22, 2011 - Aug 30, 2011
#7-13.99%
Jul 3, 2025 - Aug 8, 2025
-16.31%
Mar 23, 2015 - Nov 5, 2015
#8-10.47%
Feb 24, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026
-15.37%
Apr 12, 2002 - Dec 3, 2002
#9-7.99%
Jun 14, 2023 - Sep 18, 2023
-15.28%
Nov 4, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000
#10-7.50%
Sep 19, 2023 - Nov 1, 2023
-14.30%
Aug 22, 2001 - Nov 16, 2001
#11-7.19%
Sep 30, 2025 - Oct 20, 2025
-14.14%
Mar 29, 2006 - Sep 12, 2006
#12-6.08%
Dec 27, 2023 - Feb 12, 2024
-13.04%
Jul 28, 2005 - Nov 22, 2005
#13-5.77%
Feb 12, 2024 - Feb 27, 2024
-11.97%
Jan 10, 2000 - Apr 6, 2000
#14-5.23%
Feb 12, 2026 - Feb 24, 2026
-11.14%
May 18, 2000 - May 21, 2001
#15-4.73%
Nov 15, 2023 - Dec 5, 2023
-10.99%
Dec 30, 2004 - Apr 22, 2005

Correlation

Correlation between TIMB and FRT is 0.47 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.47
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

TIMB vs FRT dividend yield comparison.

YearTIMBFRT
20261.45%2.81%
202511.67%4.39%
20246.03%2.93%
20234.98%4.21%
20224.05%4.26%
20213.43%3.13%
20203.05%4.96%
20190.00%3.22%
20180.00%3.42%
20170.00%2.98%
20160.00%2.70%
20150.00%2.48%
20140.00%2.47%
20130.00%2.98%
20120.00%3.48%
20110.00%3.00%
20100.00%3.41%
20090.00%3.87%
20080.00%4.06%
20070.00%2.88%
20060.00%2.89%
20050.00%3.91%
20040.00%3.85%
20030.00%5.08%
20020.00%6.86%
20010.00%8.26%
20000.00%9.68%
19990.00%2.39%

Select Stocks to Compare