TGS vs CNO
Comparison between Transportadora de Gas del Sur (TGS, Company) and CNO Financial Group Inc (CNO, Company).
TGS is from the Energy sector, while CNO is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceTGS has outperformed CNO, delivering a return of +43.6% compared to +20.2%
TGS vs CNO - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TGS vs CNO - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TGS vs CNO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TGS | CNO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +2.60% | +21.39% |
| 2025 | -4.04% | +16.32% |
| 2024 | +92.82% | +35.52% |
| 2023 | +30.54% | +23.60% |
| 2022 | +162.22% | -3.97% |
| 2021 | -16.07% | +12.39% |
| 2020 | -25.93% | +25.30% |
| 2019 | -43.85% | +23.59% |
| 2018 | -31.16% | -38.00% |
| 2017 | +131.08% | +30.34% |
| 2016 | +50.44% | +5.54% |
| 2015 | +77.04% | +13.58% |
| 2014 | +74.73% | -0.30% |
| 2013 | +37.21% | +89.11% |
| 2012 | -36.75% | +47.76% |
| 2011 | -26.78% | -11.38% |
| 2010 | +88.65% | +28.90% |
| 2009 | +40.74% | +6.16% |
| 2008 | -65.37% | -58.39% |
| 2007 | -19.32% | -37.67% |
| 2006 | +37.76% | -14.40% |
| 2005 | +2.53% | +15.79% |
| 2004 | +8.21% | -8.11% |
| 2003 | +215.43% | +9.00% |
| 2002 | -76.61% | N/A |
| 2001 | -19.14% | N/A |
| 2000 | -19.10% | N/A |
| 1999 | +9.71% | N/A |
TGS vs CNO Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TGS was -92.63%, occurring on Jun 7, 2002. Recovery took 1750 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CNO was -98.99%, occurring on Mar 10, 2009. Recovery took 2896 trading sessions.
The current TGS drawdown is -10.53%. The current CNO drawdown is -0.78%.
| Rank | TGS | CNO |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -92.63% Jul 14, 2000 - Jul 3, 2007 | -98.99% Apr 5, 2006 - Oct 5, 2017 |
| #2 | -83.08% Jul 5, 2007 - Mar 9, 2015 | -63.84% Jan 11, 2018 - Feb 24, 2021 |
| #3 | -80.57% Dec 20, 2017 - May 30, 2024 | -38.01% May 17, 2021 - Nov 24, 2023 |
| #4 | -39.49% Jan 7, 2025 - Jan 27, 2026 | -33.75% Apr 12, 2004 - Jan 9, 2006 |
| #5 | -35.69% Mar 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 | -16.97% Sep 11, 2003 - Dec 29, 2003 |
| #6 | -23.46% Nov 20, 2015 - Oct 5, 2016 | -15.86% Apr 2, 2025 - Dec 15, 2025 |
| #7 | -21.58% May 30, 2024 - Sep 4, 2024 | -11.42% Jan 22, 2004 - Apr 12, 2004 |
| #8 | -18.94% Apr 2, 2026 - May 20, 2026 | -11.33% Nov 26, 2024 - Feb 7, 2025 |
| #9 | -17.47% Feb 17, 2000 - Jul 12, 2000 | -11.03% Feb 6, 2026 - Apr 28, 2026 |
| #10 | -14.75% Jan 27, 2026 - Mar 24, 2026 | -10.64% Jul 31, 2024 - Aug 30, 2024 |
| #11 | -14.10% Oct 21, 2016 - Nov 25, 2016 | -10.29% Dec 28, 2023 - May 9, 2024 |
| #12 | -13.94% Sep 16, 2024 - Oct 24, 2024 | -9.74% Mar 15, 2021 - May 6, 2021 |
| #13 | -13.41% Jul 5, 2017 - Aug 14, 2017 | -7.86% Jan 8, 2026 - Feb 6, 2026 |
| #14 | -13.33% Dec 16, 1999 - Feb 17, 2000 | -7.59% Aug 30, 2024 - Sep 18, 2024 |
| #15 | -12.40% Apr 17, 2017 - Jun 2, 2017 | -7.45% May 17, 2024 - Jul 11, 2024 |
Correlation
Correlation between TGS and CNO is 0.86 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
TGS vs CNO dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TGS | CNO |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.69% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 1.58% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 1.69% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 2.11% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 2.41% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 2.11% |
| 2019 | 14.46% | 2.37% |
| 2018 | 5.04% | 2.62% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 1.42% |
| 2016 | 0.34% | 1.62% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 1.41% |
| 2014 | 4.85% | 1.39% |
| 2013 | 8.71% | 0.62% |
| 2012 | 9.41% | 0.64% |
| 2011 | 49.21% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.34% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.88% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 3.39% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 11.26% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 8.62% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks