TAP vs EMN
Comparison between Molson Coors Beverage Company - Class B (TAP, Company) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company).
TAP is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while EMN is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceTAP has outperformed EMN, delivering a return of -4.0% compared to -6.4%
TAP vs EMN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TAP vs EMN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TAP vs EMN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TAP | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -10.30% | +18.31% |
| 2025 | -15.38% | -24.53% |
| 2024 | -4.77% | +5.62% |
| 2023 | +27.23% | +13.61% |
| 2022 | +11.98% | -29.62% |
| 2021 | +3.03% | +25.71% |
| 2020 | -14.59% | +32.48% |
| 2019 | -2.09% | +12.06% |
| 2018 | -30.03% | -20.50% |
| 2017 | -14.61% | +25.08% |
| 2016 | +7.21% | +15.91% |
| 2015 | +29.89% | -9.67% |
| 2014 | +37.96% | -3.84% |
| 2013 | +32.37% | +17.63% |
| 2012 | +1.10% | +72.68% |
| 2011 | -10.23% | -6.26% |
| 2010 | +12.05% | +39.87% |
| 2009 | -6.83% | +90.79% |
| 2008 | -1.31% | -45.80% |
| 2007 | +34.16% | +4.61% |
| 2006 | +16.04% | +17.28% |
| 2005 | -9.32% | -6.99% |
| 2004 | +37.41% | +51.49% |
| 2003 | -7.91% | +10.46% |
| 2002 | +17.18% | -1.78% |
| 2001 | -30.74% | -14.35% |
| 2000 | +60.44% | +9.36% |
| 1999 | -3.02% | +27.57% |
TAP vs EMN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TAP was -67.73%, occurring on Sep 25, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.
The current TAP drawdown is -51.78%. The current EMN drawdown is -30.72%.
| Rank | TAP | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -67.73% Oct 14, 2016 - Sep 25, 2020 | -76.10% May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010 |
| #2 | -46.18% Jun 5, 2008 - Apr 19, 2013 | -62.79% Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 |
| #3 | -45.41% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 28, 2005 | -49.36% Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #4 | -30.74% Nov 4, 1999 - May 11, 2000 | -44.78% May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004 |
| #5 | -26.53% Apr 7, 2005 - Jan 3, 2007 | -37.68% May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012 |
| #6 | -22.96% Oct 31, 2007 - May 6, 2008 | -32.81% Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017 |
| #7 | -16.18% Apr 8, 2015 - Sep 16, 2015 | -32.78% May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001 |
| #8 | -16.00% May 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 | -32.38% Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000 |
| #9 | -13.02% Aug 14, 2000 - Sep 22, 2000 | -25.48% Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006 |
| #10 | -12.19% Sep 16, 2014 - Nov 17, 2014 | -22.79% Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022 |
| #11 | -12.10% Dec 4, 2015 - Mar 22, 2016 | -20.90% Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012 |
| #12 | -10.36% Oct 18, 2000 - Nov 15, 2000 | -17.42% Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 |
| #13 | -10.28% May 17, 2013 - Aug 6, 2013 | -13.98% Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013 |
| #14 | -10.22% Jun 20, 2014 - Aug 14, 2014 | -11.60% Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014 |
| #15 | -10.19% May 24, 2000 - Jun 13, 2000 | -11.57% Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between TAP and EMN is 0.74 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
TAP vs EMN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TAP | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.31% | 1.12% |
| 2025 | 4.03% | 5.22% |
| 2024 | 3.07% | 3.57% |
| 2023 | 2.68% | 3.54% |
| 2022 | 2.95% | 3.77% |
| 2021 | 1.47% | 2.34% |
| 2020 | 1.26% | 2.66% |
| 2019 | 3.64% | 3.18% |
| 2018 | 2.92% | 3.15% |
| 2017 | 2.00% | 2.26% |
| 2016 | 1.69% | 2.51% |
| 2015 | 1.75% | 2.46% |
| 2014 | 1.99% | 1.91% |
| 2013 | 2.28% | 1.55% |
| 2012 | 2.99% | 1.59% |
| 2011 | 2.85% | 2.53% |
| 2010 | 2.15% | 2.13% |
| 2009 | 2.04% | 2.92% |
| 2008 | 1.55% | 5.55% |
| 2007 | 1.24% | 2.88% |
| 2006 | 1.67% | 2.98% |
| 2005 | 1.91% | 3.41% |
| 2004 | 1.08% | 3.05% |
| 2003 | 1.46% | 4.45% |
| 2002 | 1.34% | 4.79% |
| 2001 | 1.50% | 4.51% |
| 2000 | 0.90% | 3.61% |
| 1999 | 0.31% | 0.92% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks