TAK vs MT
Comparison between Takeda Pharmaceutical Company (TAK, Company) and ArcelorMittal (MT, Company).
TAK is from the Healthcare sector, while MT is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceMT has outperformed TAK, delivering a return of +19.5% compared to +1.8%
TAK vs MT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
TAK vs MT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
TAK vs MT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | TAK | MT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.26% | +45.54% |
| 2025 | +22.99% | +102.52% |
| 2024 | -3.61% | -16.41% |
| 2023 | -5.85% | +8.57% |
| 2022 | +18.65% | -17.23% |
| 2021 | -22.56% | +34.13% |
| 2020 | -6.18% | +29.31% |
| 2019 | +22.51% | -12.23% |
| 2018 | -39.08% | -39.18% |
| 2017 | +41.14% | +43.41% |
| 2016 | -12.79% | +137.07% |
| 2015 | +24.83% | -60.43% |
| 2014 | -6.18% | -36.59% |
| 2013 | +5.60% | +2.53% |
| 2012 | +4.65% | -8.10% |
| 2011 | -6.27% | -48.80% |
| 2010 | +18.84% | -19.09% |
| 2009 | -18.93% | +79.03% |
| 2008 | +16.78% | -66.82% |
| 2007 | N/A | +93.01% |
| 2006 | N/A | +69.10% |
| 2005 | N/A | -26.22% |
| 2004 | N/A | +329.92% |
| 2003 | N/A | +299.55% |
| 2002 | N/A | +18.92% |
| 2001 | N/A | -36.36% |
| 2000 | N/A | -85.71% |
| 1999 | N/A | +50.80% |
TAK vs MT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for TAK was -54.24%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for MT was -96.35%, occurring on Feb 11, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current TAK drawdown is -31.25%. The current MT drawdown is -60.22%.
| Rank | TAK | MT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -54.24% Jan 26, 2018 - Mar 18, 2020 | -96.35% Jun 5, 2008 - Feb 11, 2016 |
| #2 | -42.78% Jan 2, 2009 - Feb 28, 2011 | -95.62% Jan 14, 2000 - Aug 2, 2004 |
| #3 | -22.11% Mar 6, 2015 - May 17, 2017 | -46.40% Feb 25, 2005 - May 8, 2006 |
| #4 | -21.72% Apr 25, 2013 - Mar 3, 2015 | -28.64% May 8, 2006 - Oct 19, 2006 |
| #5 | -17.62% Sep 29, 2011 - Jul 18, 2012 | -28.56% Oct 29, 2007 - Apr 4, 2008 |
| #6 | -13.73% Oct 30, 2008 - Dec 30, 2008 | -27.60% Dec 1, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 |
| #7 | -10.93% Feb 28, 2011 - Sep 27, 2011 | -22.91% Oct 6, 2004 - Oct 26, 2004 |
| #8 | -8.91% Mar 27, 2013 - Apr 24, 2013 | -20.72% Jul 12, 2007 - Sep 14, 2007 |
| #9 | -5.74% Sep 24, 2012 - Jan 11, 2013 | -12.06% Sep 13, 2004 - Oct 4, 2004 |
| #10 | -5.57% Nov 1, 2017 - Dec 26, 2017 | -10.37% Dec 7, 1999 - Dec 21, 1999 |
| #11 | -5.22% Jan 30, 2013 - Feb 22, 2013 | -9.62% Aug 10, 2004 - Sep 7, 2004 |
| #12 | -5.22% Jun 5, 2017 - Jul 28, 2017 | -8.75% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 26, 2007 |
| #13 | -3.93% Sep 11, 2017 - Oct 4, 2017 | -7.75% Dec 11, 2006 - Jan 23, 2007 |
| #14 | -2.91% Jan 10, 2018 - Jan 23, 2018 | -6.91% Jun 21, 2007 - Jul 9, 2007 |
| #15 | -2.79% Jul 18, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012 | -6.66% Oct 26, 2006 - Dec 11, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between TAK and MT is -0.29 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2005 - 2026)
TAK vs MT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | TAK | MT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| 2025 | 4.24% | 1.21% |
| 2024 | 4.67% | 2.16% |
| 2023 | 4.41% | 1.55% |
| 2022 | 4.23% | 1.45% |
| 2021 | 2.98% | 0.94% |
| 2020 | 2.30% | 0.00% |
| 2019 | 4.20% | 1.14% |
| 2018 | 4.77% | 0.48% |
| 2017 | 2.81% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 3.99% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 2.92% | 4.03% |
| 2014 | 3.96% | 1.54% |
| 2013 | 3.88% | 1.91% |
| 2012 | 5.00% | 3.65% |
| 2011 | 5.14% | 3.51% |
| 2010 | 2.19% | 1.67% |
| 2009 | 4.87% | 1.39% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 6.48% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.43% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 5.41% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.32% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks