SVC vs LQDT

Comparison between Service Properties Trust (SVC, Company) and Liquidity Services Inc (LQDT, Company).

SVC is from the Real Estate sector, while LQDT is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceLQDT has outperformed SVC, delivering a return of +11.4% compared to -28.8%

SVC vs LQDT - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	SVC(COMPANY)	LQDT(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$1.44B	$1.44B
Max Drawdown	97.69%	95.31%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.41	1.36
5Y Beta	1.25	0.76
Industry	Reit - Hotel & Motel	Internet Retail
P/E Ratio	-6.07	46.99
Forward P/E	21.37	24.15
PEG Ratio	N/A	2.65
Dividend Yield	2.30%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	10.76%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	-31.77%	12.50%
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	8.00%	5.41%

Market Cap

Winner

SVC

$1.44B

LQDT

$1.44B

Max Drawdown

SVC

97.69%

Winner

LQDT

95.31%

Sharpe Ratio

SVC

-0.41

Winner

LQDT

1.36

5Y Beta

SVC

1.25

Winner

LQDT

0.76

Industry

SVC

Reit - Hotel & Motel

LQDT

Internet Retail

P/E Ratio

Winner

SVC

-6.07

LQDT

46.99

Forward P/E

Winner

SVC

21.37

LQDT

24.15

PEG Ratio

SVC

N/A

LQDT

2.65

Dividend Yield

SVC

2.30%

LQDT

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

SVC

10.76%

LQDT

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

SVC

-31.77%

Winner

LQDT

12.50%

Debt to Equity

SVC

0.00%

LQDT

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

SVC

8.00%

LQDT

5.41%

SVC vs LQDT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	SVC	LQDT
1 month	+11.30%	+3.44%
3 months	+33.74%	+18.51%
6 months	-17.04%	+21.43%
1 year	-31.99%	+54.36%
5 years(CAGR)	-28.75%	+11.44%
10 years(CAGR)	-20.64%	+17.16%
Max(CAGR)	-2.02%	+5.88%

Winner

SVC

+11.30%

LQDT

+3.44%

Winner

SVC

+33.74%

LQDT

+18.51%

SVC

-17.04%

Winner

LQDT

+21.43%

SVC

-31.99%

Winner

LQDT

+54.36%

5Y(CAGR)

SVC

-28.75%

Winner

LQDT

+11.44%

10Y(CAGR)

SVC

-20.64%

Winner

LQDT

+17.16%

Max(CAGR)

SVC

-2.02%

Winner

LQDT

+5.88%

SVC vs LQDT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	SVC	LQDT
2026	-8.74%	+28.12%
2025	-25.43%	-5.16%
2024	-67.30%	+88.50%
2023	+31.56%	+21.97%
2022	-18.94%	-36.75%
2021	-19.74%	+35.79%
2020	-50.60%	+174.31%
2019	+13.16%	-7.88%
2018	-13.96%	+31.28%
2017	-0.39%	-50.76%
2016	+30.86%	+49.08%
2015	-9.87%	-18.34%
2014	+22.96%	-63.62%
2013	+20.55%	-45.66%
2012	+7.89%	+8.96%
2011	+4.40%	+155.19%
2010	+5.79%	+38.42%
2009	+74.04%	+18.47%
2008	-46.80%	-33.84%
2007	-22.94%	-26.95%
2006	+24.51%	+45.23%
2005	-6.03%	N/A
2004	+20.06%	N/A
2003	+30.09%	N/A
2002	+30.09%	N/A
2001	+44.35%	N/A
2000	+32.48%	N/A
1999	-10.85%	N/A

SVC vs LQDT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SVC was -94.14%, occurring on Apr 1, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for LQDT was -95.31%, occurring on Mar 27, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current SVC drawdown is -91.43%. The current LQDT drawdown is -41.91%.

Rank	SVC	LQDT
#1	-94.14% Apr 27, 2017 - Apr 1, 2026	-95.31% May 9, 2012 - Mar 27, 2020
#2	-81.96% Feb 7, 2007 - Apr 30, 2013	-79.68% Feb 12, 2007 - Jun 23, 2011
#3	-30.19% Apr 6, 2015 - Jul 12, 2016	-53.04% May 31, 2006 - Nov 13, 2006
#4	-27.88% Aug 23, 2001 - Dec 18, 2001	-27.94% Aug 3, 2011 - Sep 1, 2011
#5	-24.71% May 21, 2013 - May 1, 2014	-20.38% Nov 20, 2006 - Feb 8, 2007
#6	-21.35% Jun 28, 2002 - Dec 27, 2002	-19.83% Sep 28, 2011 - Dec 6, 2011
#7	-21.27% Apr 1, 2004 - Nov 4, 2004	-15.03% May 5, 2006 - May 26, 2006
#8	-20.00% Jan 6, 2003 - Sep 22, 2003	-14.41% Jan 10, 2012 - Feb 13, 2012
#9	-17.00% Aug 1, 2016 - Dec 30, 2016	-12.97% Sep 16, 2011 - Sep 28, 2011
#10	-15.93% Aug 2, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001	-8.67% Sep 6, 2011 - Sep 15, 2011
#11	-15.81% Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 6, 2000	-8.65% Mar 24, 2006 - Apr 19, 2006
#12	-15.17% Dec 30, 2004 - Feb 15, 2006	-7.57% Mar 26, 2012 - Apr 5, 2012
#13	-12.05% Jul 18, 2014 - Nov 3, 2014	-6.75% Dec 16, 2011 - Jan 10, 2012
#14	-11.62% Jan 29, 2015 - Mar 20, 2015	-6.64% Jul 20, 2011 - Aug 2, 2011
#15	-10.66% Mar 10, 2006 - Aug 4, 2006	-6.55% Feb 27, 2012 - Mar 9, 2012

Correlation

Correlation between SVC and LQDT is -0.38 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.38

-101