STZ vs NMR
Comparison between Constellation Brands Inc - Class A (STZ, Company) and Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company).
STZ is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while NMR is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed STZ, delivering a return of +14.9% compared to -6.9%
STZ vs NMR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
STZ vs NMR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
STZ vs NMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | STZ | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +5.03% | +6.00% |
| 2025 | -36.43% | +53.57% |
| 2024 | -7.92% | +35.63% |
| 2023 | +7.76% | +21.20% |
| 2022 | -7.14% | -12.30% |
| 2021 | +17.35% | -17.05% |
| 2020 | +18.30% | +3.34% |
| 2019 | +17.51% | +35.43% |
| 2018 | -28.09% | -36.95% |
| 2017 | +49.28% | -0.51% |
| 2016 | +10.03% | +10.26% |
| 2015 | +47.20% | +0.64% |
| 2014 | +41.78% | -23.82% |
| 2013 | +87.38% | +29.46% |
| 2012 | +70.72% | +92.81% |
| 2011 | -4.35% | -52.04% |
| 2010 | +37.41% | -14.33% |
| 2009 | -3.16% | -11.17% |
| 2008 | -32.84% | -49.10% |
| 2007 | -16.76% | -11.80% |
| 2006 | +11.66% | -1.99% |
| 2005 | +12.91% | +34.20% |
| 2004 | +41.37% | -14.69% |
| 2003 | +33.70% | +52.55% |
| 2002 | +10.92% | -13.30% |
| 2001 | +50.35% | -29.05% |
| 2000 | +17.95% | +2.57% |
| 1999 | -13.01% | +11.76% |
STZ vs NMR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for STZ was -64.97%, occurring on Nov 12, 2008. Recovery took 1797 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current STZ drawdown is -43.41%. The current NMR drawdown is -56.09%.
| Rank | STZ | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -64.97% Jun 28, 2005 - Aug 15, 2012 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 |
| #2 | -53.52% Apr 27, 2018 - Jan 7, 2021 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 |
| #3 | -51.28% Mar 27, 2024 - Nov 7, 2025 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 |
| #4 | -31.25% Jun 28, 2002 - Nov 5, 2003 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 |
| #5 | -28.92% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 11, 2001 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 |
| #6 | -21.59% Jan 29, 2013 - Feb 14, 2013 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 |
| #7 | -21.32% Aug 20, 2001 - Jan 8, 2002 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 |
| #8 | -20.06% Dec 2, 2022 - Jul 19, 2023 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 |
| #9 | -16.31% Jan 4, 2022 - Apr 19, 2022 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 |
| #10 | -16.00% Jul 31, 2023 - Mar 25, 2024 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 |
| #11 | -15.07% Apr 5, 2001 - May 17, 2001 | N/A |
| #12 | -15.02% May 7, 2002 - Jun 27, 2002 | N/A |
| #13 | -14.91% Oct 10, 2016 - Apr 6, 2017 | N/A |
| #14 | -14.16% Aug 25, 2022 - Nov 25, 2022 | N/A |
| #15 | -13.93% Apr 12, 2005 - Jun 28, 2005 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between STZ and NMR is -0.54 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
STZ vs NMR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | STZ | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.40% | 1.71% |
| 2025 | 2.95% | 4.91% |
| 2024 | 1.77% | 4.29% |
| 2023 | 1.44% | 1.20% |
| 2022 | 1.36% | 3.86% |
| 2021 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 1.37% | 0.86% |
| 2019 | 1.58% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 1.70% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 0.86% | 1.70% |
| 2016 | 0.98% | 1.79% |
| 2015 | 0.65% | 3.34% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 2.44% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.77% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 1.28% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 5.11% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 1.37% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.57% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.85% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.36% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.07% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.08% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.05% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 5.57% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 6.49% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks