STM vs FANG
Comparison between ST Microelectronics (STM, Company) and Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG, Company).
STM is from the Technology sector, while FANG is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceFANG has outperformed STM, delivering a return of +26.6% compared to +14.0%
STM vs FANG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
STM vs FANG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
STM vs FANG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | STM | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +144.97% | +33.25% |
| 2025 | +8.18% | -7.29% |
| 2024 | -47.83% | +9.01% |
| 2023 | +42.54% | +24.53% |
| 2022 | -28.69% | +30.67% |
| 2021 | +27.60% | +124.93% |
| 2020 | +34.11% | -45.88% |
| 2019 | +98.37% | -1.76% |
| 2018 | -37.25% | -27.29% |
| 2017 | +101.31% | +22.28% |
| 2016 | +78.40% | +52.87% |
| 2015 | -7.82% | +11.63% |
| 2014 | +0.21% | +16.85% |
| 2013 | +12.24% | +174.85% |
| 2012 | +21.80% | +9.26% |
| 2011 | -42.52% | N/A |
| 2010 | +15.26% | N/A |
| 2009 | +40.08% | N/A |
| 2008 | -51.61% | N/A |
| 2007 | -21.20% | N/A |
| 2006 | -0.53% | N/A |
| 2005 | -5.14% | N/A |
| 2004 | -28.70% | N/A |
| 2003 | +28.80% | N/A |
| 2002 | -42.05% | N/A |
| 2001 | -21.37% | N/A |
| 2000 | -17.21% | N/A |
| 1999 | +68.62% | N/A |
STM vs FANG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for STM was -94.40%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 5445 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FANG was -88.72%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 841 trading sessions.
The current FANG drawdown is -5.56%.
| Rank | STM | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -94.40% Mar 9, 2000 - Oct 28, 2021 | -88.72% Oct 3, 2018 - Feb 4, 2022 |
| #2 | -66.67% Jul 27, 2023 - Apr 30, 2026 | -42.60% Jun 23, 2014 - May 26, 2016 |
| #3 | -43.05% Nov 18, 2021 - Mar 30, 2023 | -42.10% Jul 17, 2024 - Mar 26, 2026 |
| #4 | -22.73% Mar 31, 2023 - Jul 27, 2023 | -33.47% Jun 7, 2022 - Oct 31, 2022 |
| #5 | -18.61% Jan 3, 2000 - Jan 20, 2000 | -24.11% Feb 15, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017 |
| #6 | -14.46% Feb 8, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000 | -23.95% Nov 15, 2022 - Oct 12, 2023 |
| #7 | -7.99% Dec 7, 1999 - Dec 16, 1999 | -19.42% Nov 5, 2013 - Feb 7, 2014 |
| #8 | -6.28% Nov 18, 1999 - Nov 26, 1999 | -18.43% May 21, 2018 - Oct 1, 2018 |
| #9 | -5.31% May 14, 2026 - May 20, 2026 | -16.48% Jan 23, 2018 - Mar 26, 2018 |
| #10 | -5.23% Jan 25, 2000 - Feb 1, 2000 | -14.97% Mar 26, 2018 - May 8, 2018 |
| #11 | -5.14% Nov 11, 1999 - Nov 18, 1999 | -14.42% Mar 25, 2022 - May 26, 2022 |
| #12 | -4.22% Nov 8, 2021 - Nov 18, 2021 | -13.50% Feb 19, 2013 - Mar 5, 2013 |
| #13 | -3.64% May 11, 2026 - May 13, 2026 | -13.24% Oct 10, 2016 - Nov 30, 2016 |
| #14 | -3.54% May 6, 2026 - May 8, 2026 | -11.93% Oct 18, 2023 - Feb 14, 2024 |
| #15 | -1.98% Dec 29, 1999 - Jan 3, 2000 | -11.69% May 4, 2026 - May 8, 2026 |
Correlation
Correlation between STM and FANG is 0.62 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
STM vs FANG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | STM | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.13% | 1.07% |
| 2025 | 1.39% | 2.66% |
| 2024 | 1.32% | 5.06% |
| 2023 | 0.48% | 5.15% |
| 2022 | 0.67% | 6.55% |
| 2021 | 0.45% | 1.62% |
| 2020 | 0.50% | 3.10% |
| 2019 | 0.89% | 0.74% |
| 2018 | 1.73% | 0.40% |
| 2017 | 0.98% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 2.10% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 5.11% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 4.55% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 4.25% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 5.87% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 5.30% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 1.95% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 1.65% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 3.50% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 1.78% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.49% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.47% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.22% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.15% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.09% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks