STAG vs CLF
Comparison between STAG Industrial Inc (STAG, Company) and Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company).
STAG is from the Real Estate sector, while CLF is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSTAG has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +5.2% compared to -7.6%
STAG vs CLF - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
STAG vs CLF - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
STAG vs CLF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | STAG | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.68% | -0.11% |
| 2025 | +16.10% | +39.20% |
| 2024 | -11.11% | -52.45% |
| 2023 | +26.54% | +21.62% |
| 2022 | -28.26% | -25.86% |
| 2021 | +64.10% | +50.97% |
| 2020 | +5.35% | +88.69% |
| 2019 | +36.75% | +10.16% |
| 2018 | -3.01% | -2.66% |
| 2017 | +21.51% | -16.26% |
| 2016 | +39.68% | +403.59% |
| 2015 | -20.05% | -77.52% |
| 2014 | +28.62% | -71.27% |
| 2013 | +18.29% | -30.80% |
| 2012 | +62.04% | -38.56% |
| 2011 | -0.16% | -23.00% |
| 2010 | N/A | +63.25% |
| 2009 | N/A | +57.60% |
| 2008 | N/A | -46.54% |
| 2007 | N/A | +112.27% |
| 2006 | N/A | +5.86% |
| 2005 | N/A | +76.79% |
| 2004 | N/A | +95.85% |
| 2003 | N/A | +147.09% |
| 2002 | N/A | +7.53% |
| 2001 | N/A | -14.70% |
| 2000 | N/A | -24.00% |
| 1999 | N/A | +8.53% |
STAG vs CLF Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for STAG was -45.07%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 116 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current STAG drawdown is -5.80%. The current CLF drawdown is -86.11%.
| Rank | STAG | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -45.07% Feb 12, 2020 - Jul 29, 2020 | -98.78% Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016 |
| #2 | -42.23% Dec 31, 2021 - Oct 10, 2022 | -51.61% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 |
| #3 | -40.47% Jan 27, 2015 - Jul 19, 2016 | -48.31% Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 |
| #4 | -23.70% Jul 7, 2011 - Jan 26, 2012 | -41.76% Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004 |
| #5 | -20.62% Nov 21, 2017 - Jul 6, 2018 | -41.09% Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007 |
| #6 | -20.05% May 16, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014 | -38.96% Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 |
| #7 | -18.33% Aug 20, 2018 - Feb 11, 2019 | -32.10% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 |
| #8 | -15.85% Jun 6, 2014 - Nov 3, 2014 | -27.95% Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007 |
| #9 | -13.90% Jul 29, 2016 - Feb 21, 2017 | -21.75% Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004 |
| #10 | -12.03% Aug 7, 2020 - Mar 12, 2021 | -20.24% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004 |
| #11 | -10.99% May 10, 2012 - Jun 19, 2012 | -18.57% Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008 |
| #12 | -10.42% Jun 20, 2019 - Oct 30, 2019 | -17.14% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008 |
| #13 | -9.02% Sep 3, 2021 - Oct 18, 2021 | -16.03% Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005 |
| #14 | -7.94% Apr 2, 2012 - May 8, 2012 | -12.12% Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008 |
| #15 | -7.40% Mar 2, 2017 - Apr 11, 2017 | -11.79% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between STAG and CLF is -0.34 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
STAG vs CLF dividend yield comparison.
| Year | STAG | CLF |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.02% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 4.05% | 0.00% |
| 2024 | 4.37% | 0.00% |
| 2023 | 3.74% | 0.00% |
| 2022 | 4.52% | 0.00% |
| 2021 | 3.02% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 4.60% | 0.82% |
| 2019 | 4.53% | 3.10% |
| 2018 | 5.71% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 5.14% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 5.82% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 7.40% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 5.27% | 8.40% |
| 2013 | 5.89% | 2.29% |
| 2012 | 5.95% | 5.59% |
| 2011 | 6.36% | 1.35% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 0.55% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 1.37% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 0.50% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 0.98% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 0.68% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 0.19% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.19% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 6.96% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.21% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks