SQM vs DUK-P-A
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Duke Energy Corp (DUK-P-A, Company).
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed DUK-P-A, delivering a return of +11.8% compared to +2.6%
SQM vs DUK-P-A - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs DUK-P-A - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs DUK-P-A - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | DUK-P-A |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.54% | +1.07% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | +6.33% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | +5.05% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | +8.60% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | -9.48% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | +1.88% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | +7.86% |
| 2019 | -27.79% | +13.32% |
| 2018 | -35.04% | N/A |
| 2017 | +113.53% | N/A |
| 2016 | +61.04% | N/A |
| 2015 | -20.43% | N/A |
| 2014 | -1.99% | N/A |
| 2013 | -54.46% | N/A |
| 2012 | +7.62% | N/A |
| 2011 | -7.72% | N/A |
| 2010 | +53.00% | N/A |
| 2009 | +51.16% | N/A |
| 2008 | +46.55% | N/A |
| 2007 | +33.91% | N/A |
| 2006 | +23.39% | N/A |
| 2005 | +82.30% | N/A |
| 2004 | +52.01% | N/A |
| 2003 | +94.94% | N/A |
| 2002 | -8.87% | N/A |
| 2001 | +19.25% | N/A |
| 2000 | -10.37% | N/A |
| 1999 | +9.77% | N/A |
SQM vs DUK-P-A Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for DUK-P-A was -20.14%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 110 trading sessions.
The current SQM drawdown is -30.15%. The current DUK-P-A drawdown is -1.08%.
| Rank | SQM | DUK-P-A |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -20.14% Feb 10, 2020 - Jul 17, 2020 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -14.94% Aug 6, 2021 - Jan 19, 2024 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -5.62% Dec 30, 2020 - Apr 26, 2021 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -4.24% Oct 16, 2024 - Feb 13, 2025 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -3.65% Mar 7, 2024 - Jun 6, 2024 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -3.54% Sep 4, 2019 - Oct 14, 2019 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -3.41% Aug 20, 2020 - Oct 23, 2020 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -3.38% Mar 3, 2026 - May 8, 2026 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -3.28% Mar 17, 2025 - Jun 4, 2025 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -3.16% Oct 14, 2019 - Dec 23, 2019 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -2.99% Jul 6, 2021 - Aug 6, 2021 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -2.52% Jul 30, 2019 - Aug 15, 2019 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -2.23% Jul 30, 2020 - Aug 18, 2020 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -2.22% May 4, 2021 - May 28, 2021 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -2.13% Jun 4, 2025 - Jul 10, 2025 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and DUK-P-A is 0.38 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
SQM vs DUK-P-A dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | DUK-P-A |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.50% | 2.92% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 5.76% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 5.90% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 5.89% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 6.15% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 5.25% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 5.04% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 3.70% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 0.00% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 0.00% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 0.00% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 0.00% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 0.00% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks