SQM vs BG
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and Bunge Global SA (BG, Company).
SQM is from the Basic Materials sector, while BG is from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed BG, delivering a return of +18.4% compared to +9.7%
SQM vs BG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs BG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs BG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | BG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +14.99% | +30.76% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | +18.87% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | -21.19% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | +8.35% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | +8.87% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | +46.47% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | +18.89% |
| 2019 | -27.79% | +11.77% |
| 2018 | -35.04% | -19.10% |
| 2017 | +113.53% | -6.06% |
| 2016 | +61.04% | +10.99% |
| 2015 | -20.43% | -23.70% |
| 2014 | -1.99% | +12.73% |
| 2013 | -54.46% | +12.77% |
| 2012 | +7.62% | +25.73% |
| 2011 | -7.72% | -11.26% |
| 2010 | +53.00% | +2.96% |
| 2009 | +51.16% | +21.75% |
| 2008 | +46.55% | -57.18% |
| 2007 | +33.91% | +63.86% |
| 2006 | +23.39% | +27.45% |
| 2005 | +82.30% | +0.37% |
| 2004 | +52.01% | +74.90% |
| 2003 | +94.94% | +39.88% |
| 2002 | -8.87% | +6.09% |
| 2001 | +19.25% | +46.26% |
| 2000 | -10.37% | N/A |
| 1999 | +9.77% | N/A |
SQM vs BG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BG was -77.34%, occurring on Oct 28, 2008. Recovery took 3524 trading sessions.
The current SQM drawdown is -19.24%. The current BG drawdown is -7.62%.
| Rank | SQM | BG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -77.34% Jan 14, 2008 - Jan 11, 2022 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -41.51% Apr 18, 2022 - Jan 27, 2026 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -28.06% Jul 20, 2005 - Nov 9, 2006 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -25.63% Dec 14, 2001 - Sep 26, 2002 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -17.28% Apr 7, 2004 - Oct 15, 2004 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -15.95% Nov 18, 2002 - Jan 9, 2003 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -15.78% Feb 22, 2007 - Jul 2, 2007 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -15.06% Sep 9, 2003 - Dec 12, 2003 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -14.97% Jan 18, 2005 - May 18, 2005 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -13.87% Aug 2, 2007 - Sep 10, 2007 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -13.78% Oct 3, 2001 - Nov 1, 2001 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -11.76% Oct 25, 2007 - Dec 3, 2007 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -10.23% Jan 17, 2003 - Apr 10, 2003 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -9.59% Aug 31, 2001 - Oct 3, 2001 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -9.41% Oct 3, 2002 - Oct 21, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and BG is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
SQM vs BG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | BG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.30% | 0.58% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 3.12% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 3.48% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 2.55% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 2.31% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 2.76% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 3.05% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 3.48% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 3.59% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 2.62% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 2.21% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 2.11% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 1.41% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 1.39% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 1.43% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 1.68% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 1.34% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 1.25% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 1.39% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 0.57% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 0.86% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 0.99% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 0.84% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 1.28% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 1.60% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 0.41% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks