SMFG vs ETN
Comparison between Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc (SMFG, Company) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN, Company).
SMFG is from the Financial Services sector, while ETN is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceSMFG has outperformed ETN, delivering a return of +29.0% compared to +23.4%
SMFG vs ETN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SMFG vs ETN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SMFG vs ETN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SMFG | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +17.43% | +16.69% |
| 2025 | +38.85% | -2.81% |
| 2024 | +55.35% | +40.64% |
| 2023 | +24.49% | +55.40% |
| 2022 | +19.20% | -4.90% |
| 2021 | +11.31% | +48.41% |
| 2020 | -11.77% | +28.40% |
| 2019 | +16.07% | +42.90% |
| 2018 | -22.94% | -9.93% |
| 2017 | +16.68% | +19.01% |
| 2016 | +5.46% | +33.38% |
| 2015 | +7.21% | -20.71% |
| 2014 | -27.28% | -7.46% |
| 2013 | +43.57% | +38.36% |
| 2012 | +33.70% | +23.06% |
| 2011 | -18.79% | -13.62% |
| 2010 | +26.02% | +62.38% |
| 2009 | -32.78% | +27.80% |
| 2008 | -44.70% | -45.34% |
| 2007 | -28.27% | +31.45% |
| 2006 | -7.33% | +14.15% |
| 2005 | N/A | -3.81% |
| 2004 | N/A | +37.99% |
| 2003 | N/A | +38.00% |
| 2002 | N/A | +7.39% |
| 2001 | N/A | +13.34% |
| 2000 | N/A | +7.94% |
| 1999 | N/A | -0.58% |
SMFG vs ETN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SMFG was -77.26%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 4587 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ETN was -68.97%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 830 trading sessions.
The current SMFG drawdown is -4.07%. The current ETN drawdown is -12.06%.
| Rank | SMFG | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -77.26% Apr 10, 2006 - Jul 2, 2024 | -68.97% Jul 23, 2007 - Nov 4, 2010 |
| #2 | -25.67% Mar 21, 2025 - Aug 14, 2025 | -44.50% Feb 20, 2020 - Aug 28, 2020 |
| #3 | -21.41% Jul 31, 2024 - Nov 14, 2024 | -38.34% Feb 11, 2011 - Dec 18, 2012 |
| #4 | -20.12% Feb 13, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026 | -37.52% Jul 16, 2014 - Mar 1, 2017 |
| #5 | -11.11% Jan 31, 2006 - Apr 10, 2006 | -34.46% Dec 4, 2024 - Jul 17, 2025 |
| #6 | -9.68% Aug 15, 2025 - Nov 14, 2025 | -31.65% Apr 16, 2002 - Jul 23, 2003 |
| #7 | -9.28% Dec 3, 2024 - Feb 18, 2025 | -29.63% Apr 26, 2000 - Feb 25, 2002 |
| #8 | -5.40% Feb 19, 2025 - Mar 14, 2025 | -27.29% Nov 9, 2021 - Feb 10, 2023 |
| #9 | -5.38% Nov 14, 2025 - Nov 26, 2025 | -26.06% Sep 21, 2018 - Sep 10, 2019 |
| #10 | -4.13% Dec 15, 2025 - Dec 23, 2025 | -22.62% Nov 16, 1999 - Mar 16, 2000 |
| #11 | -3.94% Jul 23, 2024 - Jul 31, 2024 | -20.53% Dec 31, 2004 - Feb 24, 2006 |
| #12 | -3.32% Jan 15, 2026 - Feb 4, 2026 | -19.78% May 24, 2024 - Oct 11, 2024 |
| #13 | -2.69% Nov 25, 2024 - Nov 29, 2024 | -19.66% May 11, 2006 - Dec 4, 2006 |
| #14 | -2.52% Nov 14, 2024 - Nov 25, 2024 | -19.14% Jul 28, 2025 - Feb 11, 2026 |
| #15 | -1.88% Dec 24, 2025 - Jan 5, 2026 | -18.51% Sep 11, 2023 - Dec 14, 2023 |
Correlation
Correlation between SMFG and ETN is 0.75 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SMFG vs ETN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SMFG | ETN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.58% |
| 2025 | 2.84% | 1.31% |
| 2024 | 2.82% | 1.13% |
| 2023 | 3.67% | 1.43% |
| 2022 | 2.11% | 2.06% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.76% |
| 2020 | 5.97% | 1.88% |
| 2019 | 4.61% | 3.00% |
| 2018 | 4.80% | 3.85% |
| 2017 | 3.17% | 3.04% |
| 2016 | 3.63% | 3.40% |
| 2015 | 3.31% | 4.23% |
| 2014 | 3.13% | 2.88% |
| 2013 | 3.35% | 2.21% |
| 2012 | 3.37% | 2.81% |
| 2011 | 6.74% | 3.12% |
| 2010 | 0.56% | 2.13% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 3.14% |
| 2008 | 0.74% | 4.02% |
| 2007 | 2.61% | 1.77% |
| 2006 | 0.28% | 1.97% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.85% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.31% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.70% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.25% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 2.34% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.61% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks