SMB vs NCA
Comparison between VANECK SHORT MUNI ETF (SMB, ETF) and Nuveen California Municipal Value Fund. (NCA, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceSMB has outperformed NCA, delivering a return of +1.2% compared to +1.2%
SMB vs NCA - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SMB vs NCA - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SMB vs NCA - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SMB | NCA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +0.55% | +3.85% |
| 2025 | +4.55% | +10.13% |
| 2024 | +2.47% | -0.80% |
| 2023 | +3.14% | +8.96% |
| 2022 | -4.35% | -13.22% |
| 2021 | +0.06% | -2.16% |
| 2020 | +3.36% | +4.73% |
| 2019 | +4.48% | +19.52% |
| 2018 | +1.75% | -7.83% |
| 2017 | +0.69% | +1.75% |
| 2016 | -0.39% | +0.41% |
| 2015 | +1.20% | +8.06% |
| 2014 | +1.09% | +19.53% |
| 2013 | +0.53% | -5.95% |
| 2012 | +1.47% | +10.54% |
| 2011 | +5.37% | +16.12% |
| 2010 | +1.32% | +0.45% |
| 2009 | +7.86% | +10.05% |
| 2008 | +2.14% | -3.00% |
| 2007 | N/A | -5.56% |
| 2006 | N/A | +12.17% |
| 2005 | N/A | +9.35% |
| 2004 | N/A | +6.39% |
| 2003 | N/A | +3.67% |
| 2002 | N/A | +1.42% |
| 2001 | N/A | +11.60% |
| 2000 | N/A | +21.02% |
| 1999 | N/A | -8.03% |
SMB vs NCA Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SMB was -12.64%, occurring on Mar 19, 2020. Recovery took 65 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NCA was -23.58%, occurring on Oct 10, 2008. Recovery took 580 trading sessions.
The current SMB drawdown is -0.19%. The current NCA drawdown is -4.95%.
| Rank | SMB | NCA |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -12.64% Mar 9, 2020 - Jun 10, 2020 | -23.58% May 15, 2007 - Sep 1, 2009 |
| #2 | -7.48% Jul 20, 2021 - Aug 20, 2024 | -22.97% Sep 16, 2021 - Jan 7, 2026 |
| #3 | -5.58% Sep 11, 2008 - Jan 6, 2009 | -19.28% Mar 3, 2020 - Sep 14, 2020 |
| #4 | -4.11% Aug 26, 2010 - May 17, 2011 | -14.95% Jan 24, 2013 - Apr 25, 2014 |
| #5 | -4.10% Aug 2, 2016 - Aug 4, 2017 | -14.28% Sep 2, 2010 - Nov 9, 2011 |
| #6 | -4.07% May 1, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014 | -13.49% Sep 22, 2016 - Jul 9, 2019 |
| #7 | -3.84% Jan 29, 2009 - May 22, 2009 | -13.48% Nov 2, 1999 - Mar 30, 2000 |
| #8 | -2.46% Aug 30, 2017 - Dec 24, 2018 | -12.31% Jun 26, 2003 - Feb 12, 2004 |
| #9 | -2.37% Apr 10, 2008 - Aug 12, 2008 | -12.29% Feb 17, 2004 - Nov 16, 2004 |
| #10 | -1.96% Oct 2, 2009 - Nov 27, 2009 | -10.28% Sep 30, 2002 - Jun 12, 2003 |
| #11 | -1.80% Feb 28, 2025 - May 23, 2025 | -9.19% Jan 20, 2021 - Jul 29, 2021 |
| #12 | -1.79% Feb 5, 2015 - Oct 16, 2015 | -8.33% Mar 30, 2000 - Jun 9, 2000 |
| #13 | -1.62% May 22, 2009 - Jul 13, 2009 | -7.94% Mar 7, 2001 - Jul 23, 2001 |
| #14 | -1.53% Jan 8, 2009 - Jan 12, 2009 | -7.88% Mar 1, 2012 - May 4, 2012 |
| #15 | -1.49% Mar 12, 2010 - May 26, 2010 | -7.72% Aug 10, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001 |
Correlation
Correlation between SMB and NCA is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
SMB vs NCA dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SMB | NCA |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.13% | 1.61% |
| 2025 | 2.63% | 3.89% |
| 2024 | 2.38% | 4.12% |
| 2023 | 1.83% | 3.88% |
| 2022 | 1.32% | 3.66% |
| 2021 | 1.24% | 3.02% |
| 2020 | 1.50% | 2.98% |
| 2019 | 1.58% | 3.21% |
| 2018 | 1.49% | 3.79% |
| 2017 | 1.23% | 5.33% |
| 2016 | 1.12% | 4.36% |
| 2015 | 1.13% | 4.34% |
| 2014 | 1.21% | 4.45% |
| 2013 | 1.38% | 5.11% |
| 2012 | 1.64% | 4.69% |
| 2011 | 1.93% | 4.81% |
| 2010 | 2.40% | 5.32% |
| 2009 | 2.38% | 5.03% |
| 2008 | 2.34% | 6.90% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 5.13% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 4.78% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 5.39% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 6.01% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 5.97% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 5.49% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 5.17% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 2.31% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks